Ratri Tri Hapsari, Surjono Hadi Sutjahjo, Desta Wirnas, Willy Bayuardi Suwarno, Yudiwanti Wahyu
{"title":"绿豆抗落荚性与产量的基因型-环境互作","authors":"Ratri Tri Hapsari, Surjono Hadi Sutjahjo, Desta Wirnas, Willy Bayuardi Suwarno, Yudiwanti Wahyu","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mungbean [<i>Vigna radiata</i> (L.) R. Wilczek var. <i>radiata</i>] is a potential crop for an inexpensive supplier of plant-based protein for promoting food security. One of the causes of low mungbean production is pod shattering during pod maturing or harvesting. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of genotype and genotype × environment (G × E) interaction on pod-shattering resistance in mungbean. This study aimed to analyze the effect of G × E and to identify mungbean genotypes that had stability on pod-shattering resistance and high yield. The study was conducted across two locations (Malang and Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia) and two seasons (Dry Season 1, February to May 2023, and Dry Season 2, June to August 2023). Forty mungbean genotypes were evaluated for morpho-agronomic traits (three qualitative and 16 quantitative traits) and pod-shattering resistance (represented by the proportion of non-shattering pods). There was a significant interaction effect of G × E for non-shattering pod and yield. Genotypes G8 (MLGV 0377), G10 (MLGV 0371), G21 (MLGV 1052), G31 (Murai), and G36 (Vima 3) were identified as potential due to their stable resistance to pod shattering as well as high and stable yields based on several stability parameters, including linear regression coefficient (<i>b<sub>i</sub></i>) = 1. These five genotypes belong to the resistant category, exhibiting a non-shattering pod percentage of 91%–99%. No correlation was observed between qualitative traits and pod shattering, while for quantitative traits, a significant positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.35, <i>p</i> < 0.05) was found between pod width and non-shattering pod. Our findings indicate the possibility of breeding stable pod-shattering-resistant genotypes with high yield, which would pave the way to advancing near-future mungbean breeding programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genotype-by-environment interaction on pod-shattering resistance and yield of mungbean\",\"authors\":\"Ratri Tri Hapsari, Surjono Hadi Sutjahjo, Desta Wirnas, Willy Bayuardi Suwarno, Yudiwanti Wahyu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mungbean [<i>Vigna radiata</i> (L.) R. Wilczek var. <i>radiata</i>] is a potential crop for an inexpensive supplier of plant-based protein for promoting food security. One of the causes of low mungbean production is pod shattering during pod maturing or harvesting. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of genotype and genotype × environment (G × E) interaction on pod-shattering resistance in mungbean. This study aimed to analyze the effect of G × E and to identify mungbean genotypes that had stability on pod-shattering resistance and high yield. The study was conducted across two locations (Malang and Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia) and two seasons (Dry Season 1, February to May 2023, and Dry Season 2, June to August 2023). Forty mungbean genotypes were evaluated for morpho-agronomic traits (three qualitative and 16 quantitative traits) and pod-shattering resistance (represented by the proportion of non-shattering pods). There was a significant interaction effect of G × E for non-shattering pod and yield. Genotypes G8 (MLGV 0377), G10 (MLGV 0371), G21 (MLGV 1052), G31 (Murai), and G36 (Vima 3) were identified as potential due to their stable resistance to pod shattering as well as high and stable yields based on several stability parameters, including linear regression coefficient (<i>b<sub>i</sub></i>) = 1. These five genotypes belong to the resistant category, exhibiting a non-shattering pod percentage of 91%–99%. No correlation was observed between qualitative traits and pod shattering, while for quantitative traits, a significant positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.35, <i>p</i> < 0.05) was found between pod width and non-shattering pod. Our findings indicate the possibility of breeding stable pod-shattering-resistant genotypes with high yield, which would pave the way to advancing near-future mungbean breeding programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genotype-by-environment interaction on pod-shattering resistance and yield of mungbean
Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek var. radiata] is a potential crop for an inexpensive supplier of plant-based protein for promoting food security. One of the causes of low mungbean production is pod shattering during pod maturing or harvesting. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of genotype and genotype × environment (G × E) interaction on pod-shattering resistance in mungbean. This study aimed to analyze the effect of G × E and to identify mungbean genotypes that had stability on pod-shattering resistance and high yield. The study was conducted across two locations (Malang and Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia) and two seasons (Dry Season 1, February to May 2023, and Dry Season 2, June to August 2023). Forty mungbean genotypes were evaluated for morpho-agronomic traits (three qualitative and 16 quantitative traits) and pod-shattering resistance (represented by the proportion of non-shattering pods). There was a significant interaction effect of G × E for non-shattering pod and yield. Genotypes G8 (MLGV 0377), G10 (MLGV 0371), G21 (MLGV 1052), G31 (Murai), and G36 (Vima 3) were identified as potential due to their stable resistance to pod shattering as well as high and stable yields based on several stability parameters, including linear regression coefficient (bi) = 1. These five genotypes belong to the resistant category, exhibiting a non-shattering pod percentage of 91%–99%. No correlation was observed between qualitative traits and pod shattering, while for quantitative traits, a significant positive correlation (r = 0.35, p < 0.05) was found between pod width and non-shattering pod. Our findings indicate the possibility of breeding stable pod-shattering-resistant genotypes with high yield, which would pave the way to advancing near-future mungbean breeding programs.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.