开放和腹腔镜胰远端切除术中术中出血量评估不正确的可能性

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Keisuke Toya, Yoshito Tomimaru, Shogo Kobayashi, Kazuki Sasaki, Yoshifumi Iwagami, Daisaku Yamada, Takehiro Noda, Hidenori Takahashi, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi
{"title":"开放和腹腔镜胰远端切除术中术中出血量评估不正确的可能性","authors":"Keisuke Toya,&nbsp;Yoshito Tomimaru,&nbsp;Shogo Kobayashi,&nbsp;Kazuki Sasaki,&nbsp;Yoshifumi Iwagami,&nbsp;Daisaku Yamada,&nbsp;Takehiro Noda,&nbsp;Hidenori Takahashi,&nbsp;Yuichiro Doki,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Eguchi","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Decreasing intraoperative blood loss is one reported advantage of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery. However, several reports indicate that blood loss during laparoscopic surgery may be underestimated. No studies have evaluated this possibility in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). Here we evaluated estimated blood loss (e-BL) compared to intraoperative blood loss (i-BL) during distal pancreatectomy (DP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included 114 patients undergoing DP in our institution during the study period. We examined the relationship between i-BL and e-BL. Based on these results, we further investigated the relationship with LDP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The laparoscopic approach was used in a significantly higher percentage of patients in e-BL &gt; i-BL group compared to e-BL &lt; i-BL group (55.9% vs 10.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Within the LDP group (<i>n</i> = 39), e-BL was significantly more than i-BL (388 ± 248 vs 127 ± 160 mL; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Within the open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) group (<i>n</i> = 75), e-BL was significantly less than i-BL (168 ± 324 vs 281 ± 209 mL; <i>p =</i> 0.0017). The e-BL &gt; i-BL trend in the LDP group was consistent, regardless of the indication for DP. In contrast, the finding of i-BL &gt; e-BL in the ODP group was limited to patients with pancreatic cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>During LDP, e-BL was significantly more than i-BL. During ODP, e-BL was significantly less than i-BL, only in patients with pancreatic cancer. These results suggested the possibility of i-BL underestimation during LDP, and overestimation during ODP in cases with pancreatic cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 3","pages":"569-577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12888","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possibility of incorrect evaluation of intraoperative blood loss during open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Keisuke Toya,&nbsp;Yoshito Tomimaru,&nbsp;Shogo Kobayashi,&nbsp;Kazuki Sasaki,&nbsp;Yoshifumi Iwagami,&nbsp;Daisaku Yamada,&nbsp;Takehiro Noda,&nbsp;Hidenori Takahashi,&nbsp;Yuichiro Doki,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Eguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ags3.12888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Decreasing intraoperative blood loss is one reported advantage of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery. However, several reports indicate that blood loss during laparoscopic surgery may be underestimated. No studies have evaluated this possibility in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). Here we evaluated estimated blood loss (e-BL) compared to intraoperative blood loss (i-BL) during distal pancreatectomy (DP).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study included 114 patients undergoing DP in our institution during the study period. We examined the relationship between i-BL and e-BL. Based on these results, we further investigated the relationship with LDP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The laparoscopic approach was used in a significantly higher percentage of patients in e-BL &gt; i-BL group compared to e-BL &lt; i-BL group (55.9% vs 10.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Within the LDP group (<i>n</i> = 39), e-BL was significantly more than i-BL (388 ± 248 vs 127 ± 160 mL; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Within the open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) group (<i>n</i> = 75), e-BL was significantly less than i-BL (168 ± 324 vs 281 ± 209 mL; <i>p =</i> 0.0017). The e-BL &gt; i-BL trend in the LDP group was consistent, regardless of the indication for DP. In contrast, the finding of i-BL &gt; e-BL in the ODP group was limited to patients with pancreatic cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>During LDP, e-BL was significantly more than i-BL. During ODP, e-BL was significantly less than i-BL, only in patients with pancreatic cancer. These results suggested the possibility of i-BL underestimation during LDP, and overestimation during ODP in cases with pancreatic cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"569-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12888\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12888\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12888","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的减少术中出血量是腹腔镜手术与开放手术相比的优势之一。然而,一些报告表明,在腹腔镜手术失血可能被低估。目前还没有研究评估这种可能性在腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术(LDP)。在这里,我们比较了远端胰腺切除术(DP)中估计的失血量(e-BL)和术中失血量(i-BL)。方法本研究纳入研究期间在我院接受DP治疗的114例患者。我们研究了i-BL和e-BL之间的关系。基于这些结果,我们进一步研究了与LDP的关系。结果e-BL <; i-BL组患者采用腹腔镜入路的比例明显高于e-BL <; i-BL组(55.9% vs 10.9%, p < 0.0001)。在LDP组(n = 39)中,e-BL显著高于i-BL(388±248 vs 127±160 mL);p < 0.0001)。在开放式远端胰腺切除术(ODP)组(n = 75)中,e-BL显著低于i-BL(168±324 vs 281±209 mL);p = 0.0017)。无论DP指标如何,LDP组的e-BL和i-BL趋势是一致的。相比之下,ODP组中i-BL >; e-BL的发现仅限于胰腺癌患者。结论LDP期间e-BL明显多于i-BL。在ODP期间,只有胰腺癌患者的e-BL明显低于i-BL。这些结果提示胰腺癌患者在LDP期间可能低估了i-BL,而在ODP期间可能高估了i-BL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Possibility of incorrect evaluation of intraoperative blood loss during open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Aim

Decreasing intraoperative blood loss is one reported advantage of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery. However, several reports indicate that blood loss during laparoscopic surgery may be underestimated. No studies have evaluated this possibility in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). Here we evaluated estimated blood loss (e-BL) compared to intraoperative blood loss (i-BL) during distal pancreatectomy (DP).

Methods

This study included 114 patients undergoing DP in our institution during the study period. We examined the relationship between i-BL and e-BL. Based on these results, we further investigated the relationship with LDP.

Results

The laparoscopic approach was used in a significantly higher percentage of patients in e-BL > i-BL group compared to e-BL < i-BL group (55.9% vs 10.9%, p < 0.0001). Within the LDP group (n = 39), e-BL was significantly more than i-BL (388 ± 248 vs 127 ± 160 mL; p < 0.0001). Within the open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) group (n = 75), e-BL was significantly less than i-BL (168 ± 324 vs 281 ± 209 mL; p = 0.0017). The e-BL > i-BL trend in the LDP group was consistent, regardless of the indication for DP. In contrast, the finding of i-BL > e-BL in the ODP group was limited to patients with pancreatic cancer.

Conclusion

During LDP, e-BL was significantly more than i-BL. During ODP, e-BL was significantly less than i-BL, only in patients with pancreatic cancer. These results suggested the possibility of i-BL underestimation during LDP, and overestimation during ODP in cases with pancreatic cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信