解读监管机构:企业家和监管者的稳定性-灵活性感知模型

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Alberto Peralta , Susan L. Young
{"title":"解读监管机构:企业家和监管者的稳定性-灵活性感知模型","authors":"Alberto Peralta ,&nbsp;Susan L. Young","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Entrepreneurial environments are interconnected systems of actors, institutions, and cultural elements that shape the creation and growth of new ventures. A critical gap persists in understanding how regulatory institutions can simultaneously foster stability and flexibility within these environments, limiting the effective implementation of regulatory strategies by entrepreneurs and regulators. We address this by exploring key factors influencing individuals' perceptions of risk and uncertainty in regulations that promote stability and flexibility. We offer the Stability-Flexibility Perceptions Model (SFPM), a structured framework for assessing the efficiency of regulatory institutions from entrepreneurs' and regulators' perspectives. By leveraging the Index of Economic Freedom, our study's key insight is that the SFPM enables a comprehensive evaluation of stability-oriented regulations—such as property rights protection and infrastructure investment—and flexibility-oriented regulations, including labor market adaptability and regulatory simplification. Specifically, it illustrates how property rights and the rule of law, fiscal health and government size, labor and business regulations, and market openness and others are viewed as either fostering or constraining these dynamics. The SFPM enhances the understanding of dynamics within entrepreneurial environments, with its key takeaway being a valuable evaluation tool for analyzing how regulations influence perceptions of stability and flexibility. Future research should enhance the SFPM's applicability across diverse environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article e00536"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding regulatory institutions: The stability-flexibility perceptions model for entrepreneurs and regulators\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Peralta ,&nbsp;Susan L. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Entrepreneurial environments are interconnected systems of actors, institutions, and cultural elements that shape the creation and growth of new ventures. A critical gap persists in understanding how regulatory institutions can simultaneously foster stability and flexibility within these environments, limiting the effective implementation of regulatory strategies by entrepreneurs and regulators. We address this by exploring key factors influencing individuals' perceptions of risk and uncertainty in regulations that promote stability and flexibility. We offer the Stability-Flexibility Perceptions Model (SFPM), a structured framework for assessing the efficiency of regulatory institutions from entrepreneurs' and regulators' perspectives. By leveraging the Index of Economic Freedom, our study's key insight is that the SFPM enables a comprehensive evaluation of stability-oriented regulations—such as property rights protection and infrastructure investment—and flexibility-oriented regulations, including labor market adaptability and regulatory simplification. Specifically, it illustrates how property rights and the rule of law, fiscal health and government size, labor and business regulations, and market openness and others are viewed as either fostering or constraining these dynamics. The SFPM enhances the understanding of dynamics within entrepreneurial environments, with its key takeaway being a valuable evaluation tool for analyzing how regulations influence perceptions of stability and flexibility. Future research should enhance the SFPM's applicability across diverse environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235267342500023X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235267342500023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创业环境是由参与者、机构和文化元素组成的相互关联的系统,这些因素塑造了新企业的创造和成长。在理解监管机构如何在这些环境中同时促进稳定性和灵活性方面,仍然存在一个关键的差距,这限制了企业家和监管机构有效实施监管战略。我们通过探讨影响个人对促进稳定性和灵活性的法规的风险和不确定性看法的关键因素来解决这一问题。我们提供了稳定性-灵活性感知模型(SFPM),这是一个从企业家和监管者的角度评估监管机构效率的结构化框架。通过利用经济自由指数,我们研究的关键观点是,SFPM能够全面评估以稳定性为导向的法规(如产权保护和基础设施投资)和以灵活性为导向的法规(包括劳动力市场适应性和监管简化)。具体来说,它说明了产权和法治、财政健康和政府规模、劳工和商业法规、市场开放和其他因素是如何被视为促进或限制这些动态的。SFPM增强了对创业环境动态的理解,其主要收获是作为一种有价值的评估工具,用于分析法规如何影响对稳定性和灵活性的看法。未来的研究应加强SFPM在不同环境中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decoding regulatory institutions: The stability-flexibility perceptions model for entrepreneurs and regulators
Entrepreneurial environments are interconnected systems of actors, institutions, and cultural elements that shape the creation and growth of new ventures. A critical gap persists in understanding how regulatory institutions can simultaneously foster stability and flexibility within these environments, limiting the effective implementation of regulatory strategies by entrepreneurs and regulators. We address this by exploring key factors influencing individuals' perceptions of risk and uncertainty in regulations that promote stability and flexibility. We offer the Stability-Flexibility Perceptions Model (SFPM), a structured framework for assessing the efficiency of regulatory institutions from entrepreneurs' and regulators' perspectives. By leveraging the Index of Economic Freedom, our study's key insight is that the SFPM enables a comprehensive evaluation of stability-oriented regulations—such as property rights protection and infrastructure investment—and flexibility-oriented regulations, including labor market adaptability and regulatory simplification. Specifically, it illustrates how property rights and the rule of law, fiscal health and government size, labor and business regulations, and market openness and others are viewed as either fostering or constraining these dynamics. The SFPM enhances the understanding of dynamics within entrepreneurial environments, with its key takeaway being a valuable evaluation tool for analyzing how regulations influence perceptions of stability and flexibility. Future research should enhance the SFPM's applicability across diverse environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信