Eli Mlaver MD, MSc , Jyotirmay Sharma MD , Elizabeth M. Hechenbleikner MD , Jordan A. Kempker MD, MSc
{"title":"快速凝块的衍生:术后静脉血栓栓塞的多变量风险评估模型","authors":"Eli Mlaver MD, MSc , Jyotirmay Sharma MD , Elizabeth M. Hechenbleikner MD , Jordan A. Kempker MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading preventable cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in part due to failure of consistent, standardized risk assessment. Available risk assessment models (RAMs) are burdensome and lack procedural specificity or actionable thresholds for intervention. A parsimonious, clinically oriented VTE RAM has the potential to increase adherence to risk assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied multivariable logistic regression modeling with a clinically guided forward selection process to the 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project public user file. Considered predictors included patient demographics, comorbidities, and elements of the preoperative assessment. Procedural specificity was introduced by grouping Current Procedural Terminology codes and capturing minimally invasive techniques. Model performance was internally compared to three currently available RAMs: the Caprini score, cancer, old age, BMI, race, ASA model, and American College of Surgeons risk calculator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>VTE occurred in 8161 (0.76%) of 1,079,441 patients. The following eleven variables were chosen for model inclusion: age, body mass index, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification; history of steroid use, ascites, or cancer; preoperative sepsis or blood transfusion; and Current Procedural Terminology group and minimally invasive surgery. The new FAST CLOTS model has a c-statistic of 0.753 and an 89% sensitivity for VTE outcomes at the chosen cut-off of 6 out of a maximum possible total of 24 points.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As it was derived with an emphasis on biological plausibility and face validity to clinicians, the FAST CLOTS model addresses many of the limitations of currently available RAMs. If further validated and refined, adoption may improve care quality and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"310 ","pages":"Pages 362-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation of FAST CLOTS: A Multivariable Risk Assessment Model for Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism\",\"authors\":\"Eli Mlaver MD, MSc , Jyotirmay Sharma MD , Elizabeth M. Hechenbleikner MD , Jordan A. Kempker MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading preventable cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in part due to failure of consistent, standardized risk assessment. Available risk assessment models (RAMs) are burdensome and lack procedural specificity or actionable thresholds for intervention. A parsimonious, clinically oriented VTE RAM has the potential to increase adherence to risk assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied multivariable logistic regression modeling with a clinically guided forward selection process to the 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project public user file. Considered predictors included patient demographics, comorbidities, and elements of the preoperative assessment. Procedural specificity was introduced by grouping Current Procedural Terminology codes and capturing minimally invasive techniques. Model performance was internally compared to three currently available RAMs: the Caprini score, cancer, old age, BMI, race, ASA model, and American College of Surgeons risk calculator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>VTE occurred in 8161 (0.76%) of 1,079,441 patients. The following eleven variables were chosen for model inclusion: age, body mass index, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification; history of steroid use, ascites, or cancer; preoperative sepsis or blood transfusion; and Current Procedural Terminology group and minimally invasive surgery. The new FAST CLOTS model has a c-statistic of 0.753 and an 89% sensitivity for VTE outcomes at the chosen cut-off of 6 out of a maximum possible total of 24 points.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As it was derived with an emphasis on biological plausibility and face validity to clinicians, the FAST CLOTS model addresses many of the limitations of currently available RAMs. If further validated and refined, adoption may improve care quality and patient outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"310 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 362-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425002252\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425002252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Derivation of FAST CLOTS: A Multivariable Risk Assessment Model for Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism
Introduction
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading preventable cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in part due to failure of consistent, standardized risk assessment. Available risk assessment models (RAMs) are burdensome and lack procedural specificity or actionable thresholds for intervention. A parsimonious, clinically oriented VTE RAM has the potential to increase adherence to risk assessment.
Methods
We applied multivariable logistic regression modeling with a clinically guided forward selection process to the 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project public user file. Considered predictors included patient demographics, comorbidities, and elements of the preoperative assessment. Procedural specificity was introduced by grouping Current Procedural Terminology codes and capturing minimally invasive techniques. Model performance was internally compared to three currently available RAMs: the Caprini score, cancer, old age, BMI, race, ASA model, and American College of Surgeons risk calculator.
Results
VTE occurred in 8161 (0.76%) of 1,079,441 patients. The following eleven variables were chosen for model inclusion: age, body mass index, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification; history of steroid use, ascites, or cancer; preoperative sepsis or blood transfusion; and Current Procedural Terminology group and minimally invasive surgery. The new FAST CLOTS model has a c-statistic of 0.753 and an 89% sensitivity for VTE outcomes at the chosen cut-off of 6 out of a maximum possible total of 24 points.
Conclusions
As it was derived with an emphasis on biological plausibility and face validity to clinicians, the FAST CLOTS model addresses many of the limitations of currently available RAMs. If further validated and refined, adoption may improve care quality and patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.