快速凝块的衍生:术后静脉血栓栓塞的多变量风险评估模型

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Eli Mlaver MD, MSc , Jyotirmay Sharma MD , Elizabeth M. Hechenbleikner MD , Jordan A. Kempker MD, MSc
{"title":"快速凝块的衍生:术后静脉血栓栓塞的多变量风险评估模型","authors":"Eli Mlaver MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Jyotirmay Sharma MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Hechenbleikner MD ,&nbsp;Jordan A. Kempker MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading preventable cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in part due to failure of consistent, standardized risk assessment. Available risk assessment models (RAMs) are burdensome and lack procedural specificity or actionable thresholds for intervention. A parsimonious, clinically oriented VTE RAM has the potential to increase adherence to risk assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied multivariable logistic regression modeling with a clinically guided forward selection process to the 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project public user file. Considered predictors included patient demographics, comorbidities, and elements of the preoperative assessment. Procedural specificity was introduced by grouping Current Procedural Terminology codes and capturing minimally invasive techniques. Model performance was internally compared to three currently available RAMs: the Caprini score, cancer, old age, BMI, race, ASA model, and American College of Surgeons risk calculator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>VTE occurred in 8161 (0.76%) of 1,079,441 patients. The following eleven variables were chosen for model inclusion: age, body mass index, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification; history of steroid use, ascites, or cancer; preoperative sepsis or blood transfusion; and Current Procedural Terminology group and minimally invasive surgery. The new FAST CLOTS model has a c-statistic of 0.753 and an 89% sensitivity for VTE outcomes at the chosen cut-off of 6 out of a maximum possible total of 24 points.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As it was derived with an emphasis on biological plausibility and face validity to clinicians, the FAST CLOTS model addresses many of the limitations of currently available RAMs. If further validated and refined, adoption may improve care quality and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"310 ","pages":"Pages 362-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation of FAST CLOTS: A Multivariable Risk Assessment Model for Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism\",\"authors\":\"Eli Mlaver MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Jyotirmay Sharma MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Hechenbleikner MD ,&nbsp;Jordan A. Kempker MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading preventable cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in part due to failure of consistent, standardized risk assessment. Available risk assessment models (RAMs) are burdensome and lack procedural specificity or actionable thresholds for intervention. A parsimonious, clinically oriented VTE RAM has the potential to increase adherence to risk assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied multivariable logistic regression modeling with a clinically guided forward selection process to the 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project public user file. Considered predictors included patient demographics, comorbidities, and elements of the preoperative assessment. Procedural specificity was introduced by grouping Current Procedural Terminology codes and capturing minimally invasive techniques. Model performance was internally compared to three currently available RAMs: the Caprini score, cancer, old age, BMI, race, ASA model, and American College of Surgeons risk calculator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>VTE occurred in 8161 (0.76%) of 1,079,441 patients. The following eleven variables were chosen for model inclusion: age, body mass index, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification; history of steroid use, ascites, or cancer; preoperative sepsis or blood transfusion; and Current Procedural Terminology group and minimally invasive surgery. The new FAST CLOTS model has a c-statistic of 0.753 and an 89% sensitivity for VTE outcomes at the chosen cut-off of 6 out of a maximum possible total of 24 points.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As it was derived with an emphasis on biological plausibility and face validity to clinicians, the FAST CLOTS model addresses many of the limitations of currently available RAMs. If further validated and refined, adoption may improve care quality and patient outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"310 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 362-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425002252\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425002252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)仍然是术后发病率和死亡率的主要可预防原因,部分原因是未能进行一致、标准化的风险评估。现有的风险评估模型(RAMs)负担沉重,缺乏程序特异性或可操作的干预阈值。一个精简的、临床导向的静脉血栓栓塞RAM有可能增加对风险评估的依从性。方法应用多变量logistic回归模型和临床引导前向选择过程对2019年国家外科质量改进工程公众用户文件进行分析。考虑的预测因素包括患者人口统计学、合并症和术前评估的因素。通过分组现行程序术语代码和捕获微创技术,引入了程序特异性。模型的性能在内部与目前可用的三个RAMs进行比较:capriini评分、癌症、年龄、BMI、种族、ASA模型和美国外科医师协会风险计算器。结果1079441例患者中有8161例(0.76%)发生静脉血栓栓塞。选择以下11个变量纳入模型:年龄、体重指数、功能状态、美国麻醉医师协会身体状态分类;类固醇使用史、腹水史或癌症史;术前败血症或输血;当前手术术语组和微创外科。新的FAST CLOTS模型的c统计量为0.753,对于静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)结果,在24点的最大可能总数中选择6点时,灵敏度为89%。结论:FAST CLOTS模型强调生物合理性和临床有效性,解决了目前可用RAMs的许多局限性。如果进一步验证和改进,采用可能会改善护理质量和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivation of FAST CLOTS: A Multivariable Risk Assessment Model for Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading preventable cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in part due to failure of consistent, standardized risk assessment. Available risk assessment models (RAMs) are burdensome and lack procedural specificity or actionable thresholds for intervention. A parsimonious, clinically oriented VTE RAM has the potential to increase adherence to risk assessment.

Methods

We applied multivariable logistic regression modeling with a clinically guided forward selection process to the 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project public user file. Considered predictors included patient demographics, comorbidities, and elements of the preoperative assessment. Procedural specificity was introduced by grouping Current Procedural Terminology codes and capturing minimally invasive techniques. Model performance was internally compared to three currently available RAMs: the Caprini score, cancer, old age, BMI, race, ASA model, and American College of Surgeons risk calculator.

Results

VTE occurred in 8161 (0.76%) of 1,079,441 patients. The following eleven variables were chosen for model inclusion: age, body mass index, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification; history of steroid use, ascites, or cancer; preoperative sepsis or blood transfusion; and Current Procedural Terminology group and minimally invasive surgery. The new FAST CLOTS model has a c-statistic of 0.753 and an 89% sensitivity for VTE outcomes at the chosen cut-off of 6 out of a maximum possible total of 24 points.

Conclusions

As it was derived with an emphasis on biological plausibility and face validity to clinicians, the FAST CLOTS model addresses many of the limitations of currently available RAMs. If further validated and refined, adoption may improve care quality and patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信