生物质气化与水电解一体化:扫气选择的重要性

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Dohee Kim , Taehyun Kim , Yungeon Kim , Jinwoo Park
{"title":"生物质气化与水电解一体化:扫气选择的重要性","authors":"Dohee Kim ,&nbsp;Taehyun Kim ,&nbsp;Yungeon Kim ,&nbsp;Jinwoo Park","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water electrolysis and biomass gasification have emerged as promising renewable and environmentally friendly methods for producing hydrogen, and there is growing interest in integrating these two technologies. However, the role of sweep gas, a crucial factor in overcoming challenges associated with water electrolysis, has been largely overlooked in most integrated studies. To bridge this gap, the effects of three types of sweep gases (air, oxygen, and steam) on the performance of integrated systems were evaluated in this study. The process utilizing steam as the sweep gas achieved the highest energy efficiency of 72.42 %, whereas the use of air resulted in the lowest efficiency of 70.00 %. A similar trend was observed in the exergy analysis, where the use of steam resulted in the highest exergy efficiency of 64.53 %, while air led to the lowest exergy efficiency of 62.27 %. The process using air as the sweep gas demonstrated the most cost-effective levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of $1.28/kg, which was 9.0 % and 3.0 % lower than those of the processes using oxygen and steam, respectively. This study is the first to examine the influence of sweep gas types on integrated process performance, highlighting the importance of sweep gas selection. The proposed approach can be a viable alternative, as most previous studies either overlooked sweep gas or used oxygen and steam as sweep gases. These findings provide new strategies for optimizing integrated system performance and are expected to significantly contribute to the integration of green hydrogen production systems with processes other than biomass gasification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"393 ","pages":"Article 126069"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of biomass gasification and water electrolysis: Importance of sweep gas selection\",\"authors\":\"Dohee Kim ,&nbsp;Taehyun Kim ,&nbsp;Yungeon Kim ,&nbsp;Jinwoo Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Water electrolysis and biomass gasification have emerged as promising renewable and environmentally friendly methods for producing hydrogen, and there is growing interest in integrating these two technologies. However, the role of sweep gas, a crucial factor in overcoming challenges associated with water electrolysis, has been largely overlooked in most integrated studies. To bridge this gap, the effects of three types of sweep gases (air, oxygen, and steam) on the performance of integrated systems were evaluated in this study. The process utilizing steam as the sweep gas achieved the highest energy efficiency of 72.42 %, whereas the use of air resulted in the lowest efficiency of 70.00 %. A similar trend was observed in the exergy analysis, where the use of steam resulted in the highest exergy efficiency of 64.53 %, while air led to the lowest exergy efficiency of 62.27 %. The process using air as the sweep gas demonstrated the most cost-effective levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of $1.28/kg, which was 9.0 % and 3.0 % lower than those of the processes using oxygen and steam, respectively. This study is the first to examine the influence of sweep gas types on integrated process performance, highlighting the importance of sweep gas selection. The proposed approach can be a viable alternative, as most previous studies either overlooked sweep gas or used oxygen and steam as sweep gases. These findings provide new strategies for optimizing integrated system performance and are expected to significantly contribute to the integration of green hydrogen production systems with processes other than biomass gasification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"393 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925007998\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925007998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水电解和生物质气化已经成为有前途的可再生和环保的制氢方法,人们对整合这两种技术的兴趣越来越大。然而,在大多数综合研究中,扫气的作用在很大程度上被忽视了,而扫气是克服水电解相关挑战的关键因素。为了弥补这一差距,本研究评估了三种扫气(空气、氧气和蒸汽)对集成系统性能的影响。以蒸汽为扫气的工艺效率最高,达到72.42%,而以空气为扫气的工艺效率最低,为70.0%。在火用分析中也观察到类似的趋势,其中蒸汽的使用导致最高的火用效率为64.53%,而空气的使用导致最低的火用效率为62.27%。采用空气作为扫气的工艺表现出最具成本效益的氢气平准化成本(LCOH)为1.28美元/kg,分别比采用氧气和蒸汽的工艺低9.0%和3.0%。本研究首次考察了扫气类型对综合工艺性能的影响,强调了扫气选择的重要性。提出的方法可能是一种可行的替代方法,因为大多数先前的研究要么忽略了扫气,要么使用氧气和蒸汽作为扫气。这些发现为优化集成系统性能提供了新的策略,并有望为绿色制氢系统与生物质气化以外的过程的集成做出重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integration of biomass gasification and water electrolysis: Importance of sweep gas selection
Water electrolysis and biomass gasification have emerged as promising renewable and environmentally friendly methods for producing hydrogen, and there is growing interest in integrating these two technologies. However, the role of sweep gas, a crucial factor in overcoming challenges associated with water electrolysis, has been largely overlooked in most integrated studies. To bridge this gap, the effects of three types of sweep gases (air, oxygen, and steam) on the performance of integrated systems were evaluated in this study. The process utilizing steam as the sweep gas achieved the highest energy efficiency of 72.42 %, whereas the use of air resulted in the lowest efficiency of 70.00 %. A similar trend was observed in the exergy analysis, where the use of steam resulted in the highest exergy efficiency of 64.53 %, while air led to the lowest exergy efficiency of 62.27 %. The process using air as the sweep gas demonstrated the most cost-effective levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of $1.28/kg, which was 9.0 % and 3.0 % lower than those of the processes using oxygen and steam, respectively. This study is the first to examine the influence of sweep gas types on integrated process performance, highlighting the importance of sweep gas selection. The proposed approach can be a viable alternative, as most previous studies either overlooked sweep gas or used oxygen and steam as sweep gases. These findings provide new strategies for optimizing integrated system performance and are expected to significantly contribute to the integration of green hydrogen production systems with processes other than biomass gasification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信