推理能力和创造力:在解决复杂问题时哪个更重要?

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Gyöngyvér Molnár, Attila Pásztor
{"title":"推理能力和创造力:在解决复杂问题时哪个更重要?","authors":"Gyöngyvér Molnár,&nbsp;Attila Pásztor","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper focuses on reasoning skills and creativity and evaluates their changing role in the development of complex problem-solving (CPS). Specifically, the aims of the analysis are twofold: first, to monitor the differences in developmental levels of inductive reasoning (IR), combinatorial reasoning (CR), creativity and problem-solving between Grades 5 and 11 to identify periods in which major development takes place; second, to examine the predictive power of IR, CR and creativity for CPS to describe their influential role in the development of problem-solving in general and as they change over time. The sample was drawn from fifth- to eleventh-grade students (aged 10–17) (<em>N</em> = 9983). The reliability of the online tests proved to be high (EAP/PV reliability=0.884–0.952). The development of IR, CR, creativity and CPS was demonstrably slow and non-linear. The most rapid development happened in Grades 6 to 8. IR, CR and creativity each played a significant role in predicting the level of CPS individually. Their predictive power dropped significantly in the overarching model, thus explaining 71% of the variance of CPS, and changed significantly in the different developmental phases of CPS. The developmental level of reasoning skills strongly explained and influenced the success of CPS, especially between Grades 5 and 8, while the role of creativity dropped greatly after Grade 5. These results confirm and highlight the importance of the explicit development of reasoning skills at the school level, particularly in Grades 6 to 8, which may result – as a transfer effect – in the development of problem-solving skills.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasoning skills or creativity: Which is more important in complex problem-solving?\",\"authors\":\"Gyöngyvér Molnár,&nbsp;Attila Pásztor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper focuses on reasoning skills and creativity and evaluates their changing role in the development of complex problem-solving (CPS). Specifically, the aims of the analysis are twofold: first, to monitor the differences in developmental levels of inductive reasoning (IR), combinatorial reasoning (CR), creativity and problem-solving between Grades 5 and 11 to identify periods in which major development takes place; second, to examine the predictive power of IR, CR and creativity for CPS to describe their influential role in the development of problem-solving in general and as they change over time. The sample was drawn from fifth- to eleventh-grade students (aged 10–17) (<em>N</em> = 9983). The reliability of the online tests proved to be high (EAP/PV reliability=0.884–0.952). The development of IR, CR, creativity and CPS was demonstrably slow and non-linear. The most rapid development happened in Grades 6 to 8. IR, CR and creativity each played a significant role in predicting the level of CPS individually. Their predictive power dropped significantly in the overarching model, thus explaining 71% of the variance of CPS, and changed significantly in the different developmental phases of CPS. The developmental level of reasoning skills strongly explained and influenced the success of CPS, especially between Grades 5 and 8, while the role of creativity dropped greatly after Grade 5. These results confirm and highlight the importance of the explicit development of reasoning skills at the school level, particularly in Grades 6 to 8, which may result – as a transfer effect – in the development of problem-solving skills.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125001142\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125001142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文关注推理技能和创造力,并评估它们在复杂问题解决(CPS)发展中的变化作用。具体来说,分析的目的有两个:首先,监测五年级至十一年级学生在归纳推理(IR)、组合推理(CR)、创造力和解决问题方面的发展水平的差异,以确定主要发展的时期;其次,研究IR、CR和创造力对CPS的预测能力,以描述它们在解决问题的总体发展中所起的影响作用,以及它们随时间的变化。样本取自5年级至11年级的学生(10-17岁)(N = 9983)。在线测试的信度较高(EAP/PV信度= 0.884-0.952)。IR、CR、创造力和CPS的发展是明显缓慢和非线性的。发展最快的是六年级到八年级。IR、CR和创造力分别对CPS水平有显著的预测作用。他们的预测能力在总体模型中显著下降,从而解释了71%的CPS方差,并且在CPS的不同发展阶段发生了显著变化。推理能力的发展水平在很大程度上解释和影响了CPS的成功,特别是在五年级到八年级之间,而创造力的作用在五年级之后大大下降。这些结果证实并强调了在学校层面,特别是在6至8年级,明确发展推理技能的重要性,这可能导致-作为转移效应-发展解决问题的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reasoning skills or creativity: Which is more important in complex problem-solving?
This paper focuses on reasoning skills and creativity and evaluates their changing role in the development of complex problem-solving (CPS). Specifically, the aims of the analysis are twofold: first, to monitor the differences in developmental levels of inductive reasoning (IR), combinatorial reasoning (CR), creativity and problem-solving between Grades 5 and 11 to identify periods in which major development takes place; second, to examine the predictive power of IR, CR and creativity for CPS to describe their influential role in the development of problem-solving in general and as they change over time. The sample was drawn from fifth- to eleventh-grade students (aged 10–17) (N = 9983). The reliability of the online tests proved to be high (EAP/PV reliability=0.884–0.952). The development of IR, CR, creativity and CPS was demonstrably slow and non-linear. The most rapid development happened in Grades 6 to 8. IR, CR and creativity each played a significant role in predicting the level of CPS individually. Their predictive power dropped significantly in the overarching model, thus explaining 71% of the variance of CPS, and changed significantly in the different developmental phases of CPS. The developmental level of reasoning skills strongly explained and influenced the success of CPS, especially between Grades 5 and 8, while the role of creativity dropped greatly after Grade 5. These results confirm and highlight the importance of the explicit development of reasoning skills at the school level, particularly in Grades 6 to 8, which may result – as a transfer effect – in the development of problem-solving skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信