99mTc点源铅圈损坏检查及传输速率评估

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Nazenin İpek Işıkcı , Mohammad Abuqbeitah , Nami Yeyin , Sinem Akyol , Mustafa Demir
{"title":"99mTc点源铅圈损坏检查及传输速率评估","authors":"Nazenin İpek Işıkcı ,&nbsp;Mohammad Abuqbeitah ,&nbsp;Nami Yeyin ,&nbsp;Sinem Akyol ,&nbsp;Mustafa Demir","doi":"10.1016/j.net.2025.103689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intent was to inspect the damage to lead aprons worn by radiation practitioners and experimentally measure the relative transmission rates for undamaged and damaged aprons.Fluoroscopy and X-ray scans were made for 281 lead aprons collected from various departments of a large-capacity hospital. Dose rate measurements were obtained using an ionization chamber detector and <sup>99m</sup>Tc point source. The transmission rates of the undamaged and damaged aprons were calculated and statistically evaluated. Big tears and crack, besides unknown ones named type 1, type 2, type 3, and type 4. Only 14.5 % aprons were counted as damaged and 32 % were used in the operation room unit. The transmission rate of the undamaged aprons was determined as 50.88 %. The transmission rates calculated for Big tears, cracks, type 1, type 2, type 3, and type 4 damages were 91.30 %, 62.75 %, 53.22 %, 58.10 %, 57.88 %, and 55.54 %, respectively. The study revealed that aside from common damages like tears and cracks, various damages and defects may significantly affect radiation transmission. This is to conclude that periodic fluoroscopy and X-ray scans are essential to explore such invisible damages and enhance radiation protection among radiation workers. Future studies are recommended to investigate preventive measures for apron damage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19272,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","volume":"57 10","pages":"Article 103689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inspection of lead aprons damage and evaluation of transmission rate with a 99mTc point-source\",\"authors\":\"Nazenin İpek Işıkcı ,&nbsp;Mohammad Abuqbeitah ,&nbsp;Nami Yeyin ,&nbsp;Sinem Akyol ,&nbsp;Mustafa Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.net.2025.103689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The intent was to inspect the damage to lead aprons worn by radiation practitioners and experimentally measure the relative transmission rates for undamaged and damaged aprons.Fluoroscopy and X-ray scans were made for 281 lead aprons collected from various departments of a large-capacity hospital. Dose rate measurements were obtained using an ionization chamber detector and <sup>99m</sup>Tc point source. The transmission rates of the undamaged and damaged aprons were calculated and statistically evaluated. Big tears and crack, besides unknown ones named type 1, type 2, type 3, and type 4. Only 14.5 % aprons were counted as damaged and 32 % were used in the operation room unit. The transmission rate of the undamaged aprons was determined as 50.88 %. The transmission rates calculated for Big tears, cracks, type 1, type 2, type 3, and type 4 damages were 91.30 %, 62.75 %, 53.22 %, 58.10 %, 57.88 %, and 55.54 %, respectively. The study revealed that aside from common damages like tears and cracks, various damages and defects may significantly affect radiation transmission. This is to conclude that periodic fluoroscopy and X-ray scans are essential to explore such invisible damages and enhance radiation protection among radiation workers. Future studies are recommended to investigate preventive measures for apron damage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\"57 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573325002578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573325002578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是检查辐射从业人员所穿的铅围裙的损坏情况,并通过实验测量未损坏和损坏围裙的相对传输率。对某大容量医院各科室收集的281条铅围裙进行了透视和x线扫描。使用电离室探测器和99mTc点源测量剂量率。计算了未损坏和损坏胶圈的传播率,并进行了统计评价。大的撕裂和裂缝,除了未知的1型、2型、3型和4型。只有14.5%的围裙损坏,32%的围裙在手术室单元使用。测定了未损坏胶圈的透光率为50.88%。大撕裂、裂纹、1型、2型、3型和4型损伤的传输率分别为91.30%、62.75%、53.22%、58.10%、57.88%和55.54%。研究表明,除了撕裂和裂缝等常见损伤外,各种损伤和缺陷都可能对辐射传输产生重大影响。综上所述,定期透视和x射线扫描对于探索这些无形的损伤和加强辐射工作人员的辐射防护是必不可少的。建议今后进一步研究停机坪损伤的预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inspection of lead aprons damage and evaluation of transmission rate with a 99mTc point-source
The intent was to inspect the damage to lead aprons worn by radiation practitioners and experimentally measure the relative transmission rates for undamaged and damaged aprons.Fluoroscopy and X-ray scans were made for 281 lead aprons collected from various departments of a large-capacity hospital. Dose rate measurements were obtained using an ionization chamber detector and 99mTc point source. The transmission rates of the undamaged and damaged aprons were calculated and statistically evaluated. Big tears and crack, besides unknown ones named type 1, type 2, type 3, and type 4. Only 14.5 % aprons were counted as damaged and 32 % were used in the operation room unit. The transmission rate of the undamaged aprons was determined as 50.88 %. The transmission rates calculated for Big tears, cracks, type 1, type 2, type 3, and type 4 damages were 91.30 %, 62.75 %, 53.22 %, 58.10 %, 57.88 %, and 55.54 %, respectively. The study revealed that aside from common damages like tears and cracks, various damages and defects may significantly affect radiation transmission. This is to conclude that periodic fluoroscopy and X-ray scans are essential to explore such invisible damages and enhance radiation protection among radiation workers. Future studies are recommended to investigate preventive measures for apron damage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Nuclear Engineering and Technology 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
431
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Technology (NET), an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society (KNS), publishes peer-reviewed papers on original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear science and technology. NET bimonthly publishes original articles, reviews, and technical notes. The journal is listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of Thomson Reuters. NET covers all fields for peaceful utilization of nuclear energy and radiation as follows: 1) Reactor Physics 2) Thermal Hydraulics 3) Nuclear Safety 4) Nuclear I&C 5) Nuclear Physics, Fusion, and Laser Technology 6) Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Radioactive Waste Management 7) Nuclear Fuel and Reactor Materials 8) Radiation Application 9) Radiation Protection 10) Nuclear Structural Analysis and Plant Management & Maintenance 11) Nuclear Policy, Economics, and Human Resource Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信