超越过程:一个检视MOOC论坛知识建构的新分析模型

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Dennis A. Rivera , Mariane Frenay , Magali Paquot , Pauline de Montpellier , Valérie Swaen
{"title":"超越过程:一个检视MOOC论坛知识建构的新分析模型","authors":"Dennis A. Rivera ,&nbsp;Mariane Frenay ,&nbsp;Magali Paquot ,&nbsp;Pauline de Montpellier ,&nbsp;Valérie Swaen","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The analysis of learners' discussions in the forums of massive open online courses (MOOCs) often prioritises the socio-cognitive processes that learners mobilise to construct knowledge. This study goes beyond the analysis of process to study the knowledge constructed. We examine learners' MOOC forum discussions (<em>N</em> = 300) to uncover the potential dialogues that emerge and identify the key features of the concepts discussed. All discussions centre on essentially contested concepts (ECCs). To analyse learners' discussions, we introduce and evaluate a novel analytical model. Using a case-study approach, we applied our Learners' Online Discussions Analysis Model (LODAM) to analyse learners’ discussions across two MOOCs. Discussions are analysed in relation to the pedagogical design of the forums. In addition, we employ a corpus linguistic technique to study the key features of the ECCs discussed. Results show that learners do not engage in competition when discussing the key contested features of ECCs. Instead, discussions are characterised by collaboration and explanation. Furthermore, specific features are regularly discussed whereas others are largely ignored. To some extent, the design of the forums can help learners engage in collaboration. This study offers new insights into the construction of conceptual knowledge in MOOC forums. This study also illustrates how computational tools and frameworks like LODAM can help to enhance the pedagogical design of technology-enhanced learning environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 105342"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the process: A novel analytical model to examine knowledge construction in MOOC forums\",\"authors\":\"Dennis A. Rivera ,&nbsp;Mariane Frenay ,&nbsp;Magali Paquot ,&nbsp;Pauline de Montpellier ,&nbsp;Valérie Swaen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The analysis of learners' discussions in the forums of massive open online courses (MOOCs) often prioritises the socio-cognitive processes that learners mobilise to construct knowledge. This study goes beyond the analysis of process to study the knowledge constructed. We examine learners' MOOC forum discussions (<em>N</em> = 300) to uncover the potential dialogues that emerge and identify the key features of the concepts discussed. All discussions centre on essentially contested concepts (ECCs). To analyse learners' discussions, we introduce and evaluate a novel analytical model. Using a case-study approach, we applied our Learners' Online Discussions Analysis Model (LODAM) to analyse learners’ discussions across two MOOCs. Discussions are analysed in relation to the pedagogical design of the forums. In addition, we employ a corpus linguistic technique to study the key features of the ECCs discussed. Results show that learners do not engage in competition when discussing the key contested features of ECCs. Instead, discussions are characterised by collaboration and explanation. Furthermore, specific features are regularly discussed whereas others are largely ignored. To some extent, the design of the forums can help learners engage in collaboration. This study offers new insights into the construction of conceptual knowledge in MOOC forums. This study also illustrates how computational tools and frameworks like LODAM can help to enhance the pedagogical design of technology-enhanced learning environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"235 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525001101\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525001101","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)论坛中学习者讨论的分析通常优先考虑学习者为构建知识而动员的社会认知过程。本研究超越了对过程的分析,对知识的建构进行了研究。我们研究了学习者的MOOC论坛讨论(N = 300),以揭示出现的潜在对话,并确定所讨论概念的关键特征。所有讨论都集中在本质上有争议的概念(ECCs)上。为了分析学习者的讨论,我们引入并评估了一个新的分析模型。采用案例研究的方法,我们应用学习者在线讨论分析模型(LODAM)来分析两个mooc的学习者讨论。对论坛教学设计的相关讨论进行了分析。此外,我们采用语料库语言技术来研究所讨论的ECCs的主要特征。结果表明,学习者在讨论ECCs的主要竞争特征时没有参与竞争。相反,讨论的特点是合作和解释。此外,特定的功能经常被讨论,而其他功能在很大程度上被忽略了。在一定程度上,论坛的设计可以帮助学习者进行合作。本研究为MOOC论坛的概念知识建构提供了新的视角。这项研究还说明了像LODAM这样的计算工具和框架如何帮助提高技术增强学习环境的教学设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the process: A novel analytical model to examine knowledge construction in MOOC forums
The analysis of learners' discussions in the forums of massive open online courses (MOOCs) often prioritises the socio-cognitive processes that learners mobilise to construct knowledge. This study goes beyond the analysis of process to study the knowledge constructed. We examine learners' MOOC forum discussions (N = 300) to uncover the potential dialogues that emerge and identify the key features of the concepts discussed. All discussions centre on essentially contested concepts (ECCs). To analyse learners' discussions, we introduce and evaluate a novel analytical model. Using a case-study approach, we applied our Learners' Online Discussions Analysis Model (LODAM) to analyse learners’ discussions across two MOOCs. Discussions are analysed in relation to the pedagogical design of the forums. In addition, we employ a corpus linguistic technique to study the key features of the ECCs discussed. Results show that learners do not engage in competition when discussing the key contested features of ECCs. Instead, discussions are characterised by collaboration and explanation. Furthermore, specific features are regularly discussed whereas others are largely ignored. To some extent, the design of the forums can help learners engage in collaboration. This study offers new insights into the construction of conceptual knowledge in MOOC forums. This study also illustrates how computational tools and frameworks like LODAM can help to enhance the pedagogical design of technology-enhanced learning environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信