{"title":"森林保护是增加森林碳封存的社会最优策略吗?","authors":"Peichen Gong , Andres Susaeta","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies show that the optimal rotation period would be infinitely long when carbon price is sufficiently high, indicating that forest preservation could serve as an optimal strategy for mitigating global warming. This paper examines the impact of the substitution effect of harvested wood products (HWP) and the risk of natural disturbances on the optimality of infinitely long rotation period. Our analysis shows that when the substitution effects of HWP are significant, the optimal rotation remains finite regardless of how high the carbon price is. Conversely, when the substitution effects are minimal, there exists a threshold carbon price beyond which the optimal rotation period becomes infinite. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the risk of natural disturbances can either increase or decrease the likelihood that forest preservation remains the optimal choice for climate change mitigation. A numerical example illustrates that even with conservative assumptions about the substitution effect of HWP, the optimal rotation remains finite, and the risk of forest damage further reduces the optimal rotation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 103511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is forest conservation a socially optimal strategy for increasing forest carbon sequestration?\",\"authors\":\"Peichen Gong , Andres Susaeta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous studies show that the optimal rotation period would be infinitely long when carbon price is sufficiently high, indicating that forest preservation could serve as an optimal strategy for mitigating global warming. This paper examines the impact of the substitution effect of harvested wood products (HWP) and the risk of natural disturbances on the optimality of infinitely long rotation period. Our analysis shows that when the substitution effects of HWP are significant, the optimal rotation remains finite regardless of how high the carbon price is. Conversely, when the substitution effects are minimal, there exists a threshold carbon price beyond which the optimal rotation period becomes infinite. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the risk of natural disturbances can either increase or decrease the likelihood that forest preservation remains the optimal choice for climate change mitigation. A numerical example illustrates that even with conservative assumptions about the substitution effect of HWP, the optimal rotation remains finite, and the risk of forest damage further reduces the optimal rotation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000905\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is forest conservation a socially optimal strategy for increasing forest carbon sequestration?
Previous studies show that the optimal rotation period would be infinitely long when carbon price is sufficiently high, indicating that forest preservation could serve as an optimal strategy for mitigating global warming. This paper examines the impact of the substitution effect of harvested wood products (HWP) and the risk of natural disturbances on the optimality of infinitely long rotation period. Our analysis shows that when the substitution effects of HWP are significant, the optimal rotation remains finite regardless of how high the carbon price is. Conversely, when the substitution effects are minimal, there exists a threshold carbon price beyond which the optimal rotation period becomes infinite. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the risk of natural disturbances can either increase or decrease the likelihood that forest preservation remains the optimal choice for climate change mitigation. A numerical example illustrates that even with conservative assumptions about the substitution effect of HWP, the optimal rotation remains finite, and the risk of forest damage further reduces the optimal rotation.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.