Shangkun Liu , Yong He , Zhiming Qi , Ying Liu , Qianjing Jiang
{"title":"追踪“一带一路”沿线国家主要作物生命周期碳足迹","authors":"Shangkun Liu , Yong He , Zhiming Qi , Ying Liu , Qianjing Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The carbon emissions from countries participating in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) account for over half of global emissions, yet the carbon footprint (CF) of cropping systems in these countries remains insufficiently studied. This study quantifies the life cycle carbon footprint (LCCF) of three major grain crops, maize, rice, and wheat, in BRI countries from 2006 to 2019, using a hybrid approach that integrates machine learning (ML) models and life cycle assessment (LCA). This work systematically quantified cradle-to-farm-gate CF, incorporating emissions from upstream inputs, transportation, and field operations. Emission factors (EF) and CF compositions for the three crops were assessed across different time periods. To evaluate the impact of BRI on crops’ CF, a novel Supply-Demand Balanced Carbon Footprint Tracing Model (SD-CTM) was developed to trace the sources and flows of upstream CF<em>.</em> Due to the expansion of cropland, changes in agricultural management practices (AMPs), and shifts in sources of upstream input, a gradual increase in crops’ CF was noted over time, with significant regional differences in EF and CF composition. Following the implementation of the BRI, internal upstream CF flows within BRI countries intensified, with key internal international upstream correlated carbon footprint (IUCCF) suppliers gaining greater dominance, while reliance on external suppliers weakened. The present study provides critical insights into the environmental impacts of agricultural production under the BRI framework, offering guidance for sustainable agricultural policies, carbon responsibilities allocation, and international low-carbon cooperation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108382"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing the life cycle carbon footprint of staple crops in Belt and Road Initiative countries\",\"authors\":\"Shangkun Liu , Yong He , Zhiming Qi , Ying Liu , Qianjing Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The carbon emissions from countries participating in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) account for over half of global emissions, yet the carbon footprint (CF) of cropping systems in these countries remains insufficiently studied. This study quantifies the life cycle carbon footprint (LCCF) of three major grain crops, maize, rice, and wheat, in BRI countries from 2006 to 2019, using a hybrid approach that integrates machine learning (ML) models and life cycle assessment (LCA). This work systematically quantified cradle-to-farm-gate CF, incorporating emissions from upstream inputs, transportation, and field operations. Emission factors (EF) and CF compositions for the three crops were assessed across different time periods. To evaluate the impact of BRI on crops’ CF, a novel Supply-Demand Balanced Carbon Footprint Tracing Model (SD-CTM) was developed to trace the sources and flows of upstream CF<em>.</em> Due to the expansion of cropland, changes in agricultural management practices (AMPs), and shifts in sources of upstream input, a gradual increase in crops’ CF was noted over time, with significant regional differences in EF and CF composition. Following the implementation of the BRI, internal upstream CF flows within BRI countries intensified, with key internal international upstream correlated carbon footprint (IUCCF) suppliers gaining greater dominance, while reliance on external suppliers weakened. The present study provides critical insights into the environmental impacts of agricultural production under the BRI framework, offering guidance for sustainable agricultural policies, carbon responsibilities allocation, and international low-carbon cooperation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002617\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002617","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tracing the life cycle carbon footprint of staple crops in Belt and Road Initiative countries
The carbon emissions from countries participating in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) account for over half of global emissions, yet the carbon footprint (CF) of cropping systems in these countries remains insufficiently studied. This study quantifies the life cycle carbon footprint (LCCF) of three major grain crops, maize, rice, and wheat, in BRI countries from 2006 to 2019, using a hybrid approach that integrates machine learning (ML) models and life cycle assessment (LCA). This work systematically quantified cradle-to-farm-gate CF, incorporating emissions from upstream inputs, transportation, and field operations. Emission factors (EF) and CF compositions for the three crops were assessed across different time periods. To evaluate the impact of BRI on crops’ CF, a novel Supply-Demand Balanced Carbon Footprint Tracing Model (SD-CTM) was developed to trace the sources and flows of upstream CF. Due to the expansion of cropland, changes in agricultural management practices (AMPs), and shifts in sources of upstream input, a gradual increase in crops’ CF was noted over time, with significant regional differences in EF and CF composition. Following the implementation of the BRI, internal upstream CF flows within BRI countries intensified, with key internal international upstream correlated carbon footprint (IUCCF) suppliers gaining greater dominance, while reliance on external suppliers weakened. The present study provides critical insights into the environmental impacts of agricultural production under the BRI framework, offering guidance for sustainable agricultural policies, carbon responsibilities allocation, and international low-carbon cooperation.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.