ChatGPT在头脑风暴中减少了想法的多样性

IF 21.4 1区 心理学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Byung Cheol Lee, Jaeyeon ‘Jae’ Chung
{"title":"ChatGPT在头脑风暴中减少了想法的多样性","authors":"Byung Cheol Lee, Jaeyeon ‘Jae’ Chung","doi":"10.1038/s41562-025-02195-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><span>replying to</span> L. Meincke et al. <i>Nature Human Behaviour</i> https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02173-x (2025)</p><p>We appreciate the thoughtful commentary from Meincke et al.<sup>1</sup> and are pleased that our open data practices are contributing to the dialogue about ChatGPT’s impact on creativity. Our paper<sup>2</sup> evaluated ChatGPT’s potential to assist individuals in solving problems requiring creativity. After analysing our publicly available data, Meincke et al. affirmed our finding that ChatGPT has a positive impact on individual creativity; that is, ChatGPT effectively combines disparate concepts into a cohesive response, leading to more creative solutions. Meincke et al. expanded on our inquiry by taking a group-level lens to the data. They found that the pool of ChatGPT-assisted responses exhibits lower diversity, concluding that the collective use of ChatGPT may undermine “effective brainstorming”.</p>","PeriodicalId":19074,"journal":{"name":"Nature Human Behaviour","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to: ChatGPT decreases idea diversity in brainstorming\",\"authors\":\"Byung Cheol Lee, Jaeyeon ‘Jae’ Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41562-025-02195-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><span>replying to</span> L. Meincke et al. <i>Nature Human Behaviour</i> https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02173-x (2025)</p><p>We appreciate the thoughtful commentary from Meincke et al.<sup>1</sup> and are pleased that our open data practices are contributing to the dialogue about ChatGPT’s impact on creativity. Our paper<sup>2</sup> evaluated ChatGPT’s potential to assist individuals in solving problems requiring creativity. After analysing our publicly available data, Meincke et al. affirmed our finding that ChatGPT has a positive impact on individual creativity; that is, ChatGPT effectively combines disparate concepts into a cohesive response, leading to more creative solutions. Meincke et al. expanded on our inquiry by taking a group-level lens to the data. They found that the pool of ChatGPT-assisted responses exhibits lower diversity, concluding that the collective use of ChatGPT may undermine “effective brainstorming”.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Human Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Human Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02195-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02195-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回复L. Meincke等人。自然-人类行为https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02173-x(2025)我们感谢Meincke等人的周到评论1,并很高兴我们的开放数据实践有助于关于ChatGPT对创造力影响的对话。我们的论文2评估了ChatGPT在帮助个人解决需要创造力的问题方面的潜力。在分析了我们的公开数据后,Meincke等人证实了我们的发现,即ChatGPT对个人创造力有积极的影响;也就是说,ChatGPT有效地将不同的概念组合成一个有凝聚力的响应,从而产生更具创造性的解决方案。Meincke等人通过对数据采取群体层面的视角来扩展我们的调查。他们发现,ChatGPT辅助的回答呈现出较低的多样性,并得出结论,集体使用ChatGPT可能会破坏“有效的头脑风暴”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reply to: ChatGPT decreases idea diversity in brainstorming

Reply to: ChatGPT decreases idea diversity in brainstorming

replying to L. Meincke et al. Nature Human Behaviour https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02173-x (2025)

We appreciate the thoughtful commentary from Meincke et al.1 and are pleased that our open data practices are contributing to the dialogue about ChatGPT’s impact on creativity. Our paper2 evaluated ChatGPT’s potential to assist individuals in solving problems requiring creativity. After analysing our publicly available data, Meincke et al. affirmed our finding that ChatGPT has a positive impact on individual creativity; that is, ChatGPT effectively combines disparate concepts into a cohesive response, leading to more creative solutions. Meincke et al. expanded on our inquiry by taking a group-level lens to the data. They found that the pool of ChatGPT-assisted responses exhibits lower diversity, concluding that the collective use of ChatGPT may undermine “effective brainstorming”.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Human Behaviour Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
36.80
自引率
1.00%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Nature Human Behaviour is a journal that focuses on publishing research of outstanding significance into any aspect of human behavior.The research can cover various areas such as psychological, biological, and social bases of human behavior.It also includes the study of origins, development, and disorders related to human behavior.The primary aim of the journal is to increase the visibility of research in the field and enhance its societal reach and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信