Jessica H Rubens,Jacqueline K Brockhurst,Shristi Ghimire,Jinjin Wu,Liting Liu,Jason S Villano,Rebecca J Loomis,Alexandrine Derrien-Colemyn,Tracy J Ruckwardt,Barney S Graham,Michael W Watson,Guillaume B E Stewart-Jones,Diane E Griffin
{"title":"一种新型重组血凝素蛋白麻疹病毒疫苗的安全性、免疫原性和对恒河猴的保护作用。","authors":"Jessica H Rubens,Jacqueline K Brockhurst,Shristi Ghimire,Jinjin Wu,Liting Liu,Jason S Villano,Rebecca J Loomis,Alexandrine Derrien-Colemyn,Tracy J Ruckwardt,Barney S Graham,Michael W Watson,Guillaume B E Stewart-Jones,Diane E Griffin","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMeasles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) is an effective live-virus vaccine against measles but is poorly immunogenic in infants and contraindicated for pregnant and immunocompromised persons.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe evaluated immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a novel recombinant dimeric MeV hemagglutinin protein vaccine (rMeV) in rhesus macaques. Macaques (n=4) in four experimental groups were injected at days 0 and 42 with: 1) MMR/MMR; 2) rMeV/rMeV; 3) MMR/rMeV; 4) PBS/PBS and challenged intratracheally with wild type MeV 8-9 months later. Blood, nasopharyngeal (NP), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bone marrow (BM), and lymph nodes (LN) were sampled.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAll macaques that received a MeV-containing vaccine developed MeV-specific binding and neutralizing antibody titers that were similar at 169 days post-vaccination, regardless of experimental group. After challenge, all unvaccinated macaques had MeV detected in samples of blood, NP, BAL, BM and LN, and one developed a rash. No vaccinated macaque developed a rash or had detectable MeV in PBMC, BM, or NP cells. However, MeV and MeV RNA were detected in BAL samples in all experimental groups with the most virus and longest detection in rMeV-vaccinated animals.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nImmunization with rMeV protected macaques from rash, viremia and systemic virus spread. Therefore, rMeV is protective against MeV disease and a promising option for patients unable to receive or respond to MMR.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy in rhesus macaques of a novel recombinant hemagglutinin protein measles virus vaccine.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica H Rubens,Jacqueline K Brockhurst,Shristi Ghimire,Jinjin Wu,Liting Liu,Jason S Villano,Rebecca J Loomis,Alexandrine Derrien-Colemyn,Tracy J Ruckwardt,Barney S Graham,Michael W Watson,Guillaume B E Stewart-Jones,Diane E Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiaf244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nMeasles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) is an effective live-virus vaccine against measles but is poorly immunogenic in infants and contraindicated for pregnant and immunocompromised persons.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe evaluated immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a novel recombinant dimeric MeV hemagglutinin protein vaccine (rMeV) in rhesus macaques. Macaques (n=4) in four experimental groups were injected at days 0 and 42 with: 1) MMR/MMR; 2) rMeV/rMeV; 3) MMR/rMeV; 4) PBS/PBS and challenged intratracheally with wild type MeV 8-9 months later. Blood, nasopharyngeal (NP), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bone marrow (BM), and lymph nodes (LN) were sampled.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAll macaques that received a MeV-containing vaccine developed MeV-specific binding and neutralizing antibody titers that were similar at 169 days post-vaccination, regardless of experimental group. After challenge, all unvaccinated macaques had MeV detected in samples of blood, NP, BAL, BM and LN, and one developed a rash. No vaccinated macaque developed a rash or had detectable MeV in PBMC, BM, or NP cells. However, MeV and MeV RNA were detected in BAL samples in all experimental groups with the most virus and longest detection in rMeV-vaccinated animals.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nImmunization with rMeV protected macaques from rash, viremia and systemic virus spread. Therefore, rMeV is protective against MeV disease and a promising option for patients unable to receive or respond to MMR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy in rhesus macaques of a novel recombinant hemagglutinin protein measles virus vaccine.
BACKGROUND
Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) is an effective live-virus vaccine against measles but is poorly immunogenic in infants and contraindicated for pregnant and immunocompromised persons.
METHODS
We evaluated immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a novel recombinant dimeric MeV hemagglutinin protein vaccine (rMeV) in rhesus macaques. Macaques (n=4) in four experimental groups were injected at days 0 and 42 with: 1) MMR/MMR; 2) rMeV/rMeV; 3) MMR/rMeV; 4) PBS/PBS and challenged intratracheally with wild type MeV 8-9 months later. Blood, nasopharyngeal (NP), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bone marrow (BM), and lymph nodes (LN) were sampled.
RESULTS
All macaques that received a MeV-containing vaccine developed MeV-specific binding and neutralizing antibody titers that were similar at 169 days post-vaccination, regardless of experimental group. After challenge, all unvaccinated macaques had MeV detected in samples of blood, NP, BAL, BM and LN, and one developed a rash. No vaccinated macaque developed a rash or had detectable MeV in PBMC, BM, or NP cells. However, MeV and MeV RNA were detected in BAL samples in all experimental groups with the most virus and longest detection in rMeV-vaccinated animals.
CONCLUSIONS
Immunization with rMeV protected macaques from rash, viremia and systemic virus spread. Therefore, rMeV is protective against MeV disease and a promising option for patients unable to receive or respond to MMR.