持续心房颤动和左心室收缩功能障碍患者的磁共振成像对心律失常引起的心肌病的表征——来自DECAAF II的见解

IF 16.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ala Assaf,Han Feng,Mayana Bsoul,Ghassan Bidaoui,Hadi Younes,Christian Massad,Mario Mekhael,Charbel Noujaim,Omar Kreidieh,Swati Rao,Amitabh Pandey,Philipp Sommer,Christian Mahnkopf,Nassir Marrouche,Christian Sohns
{"title":"持续心房颤动和左心室收缩功能障碍患者的磁共振成像对心律失常引起的心肌病的表征——来自DECAAF II的见解","authors":"Ala Assaf,Han Feng,Mayana Bsoul,Ghassan Bidaoui,Hadi Younes,Christian Massad,Mario Mekhael,Charbel Noujaim,Omar Kreidieh,Swati Rao,Amitabh Pandey,Philipp Sommer,Christian Mahnkopf,Nassir Marrouche,Christian Sohns","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nAtrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in heart failure reduces mortality and hospitalizations and improves ejection fraction. Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is diagnosed after complete recovery of left ventricular systolic function after ablation. We aimed to identify the prevalence and pre-ablation predictors of AIC among patients with AF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).\r\n\r\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\r\nWe utilized the DECAAF II database, where 815 patients with persistent AF underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic-resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) before and 3 months after AF ablation. We only included patients with available left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LVSD. AF burden was continuously monitored. AIC was defined as LVSD and coexisting AF in patients with ejection fraction improvement to ≥50% following ablation. We identified 119 patients with LVSD and AF with a mean LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.8% and mean baseline fibrosis of 20.0 ± 7.3%. Mean AF burden post-ablation was 16.8 ± 20.2%, and mean LVEF recovery was 13.9 percentage points. Seventy-two patients (60.5%) fulfilled the criteria for AIC, and 47 (39.5%) did not. AIC patients had a mean baseline LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.9% (vs. 39.2 ± 7.9% in non-AIC patients; p = 0.9), a significantly lower percentage of fibrosis in the left atrial septal wall (12.2 ± 10.0% vs. 20.7 ± 11.4% in non-AIC patients, p < 0.001). Additionally, LVEF improvement was correlated with lower AF burden post-ablation (r = -0.23, p = 0.02).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn this post-hoc analysis of the DECAAF II trial, we found that the majority of patients with LVSD and persistent AF have AIC rather than primary cardiomyopathy. We identified LGE-CMR as a differentiator between AIC and other cardiomyopathies.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction - insights from DECAAF II.\",\"authors\":\"Ala Assaf,Han Feng,Mayana Bsoul,Ghassan Bidaoui,Hadi Younes,Christian Massad,Mario Mekhael,Charbel Noujaim,Omar Kreidieh,Swati Rao,Amitabh Pandey,Philipp Sommer,Christian Mahnkopf,Nassir Marrouche,Christian Sohns\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.3684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS\\r\\nAtrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in heart failure reduces mortality and hospitalizations and improves ejection fraction. Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is diagnosed after complete recovery of left ventricular systolic function after ablation. We aimed to identify the prevalence and pre-ablation predictors of AIC among patients with AF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS AND RESULTS\\r\\nWe utilized the DECAAF II database, where 815 patients with persistent AF underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic-resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) before and 3 months after AF ablation. We only included patients with available left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LVSD. AF burden was continuously monitored. AIC was defined as LVSD and coexisting AF in patients with ejection fraction improvement to ≥50% following ablation. We identified 119 patients with LVSD and AF with a mean LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.8% and mean baseline fibrosis of 20.0 ± 7.3%. Mean AF burden post-ablation was 16.8 ± 20.2%, and mean LVEF recovery was 13.9 percentage points. Seventy-two patients (60.5%) fulfilled the criteria for AIC, and 47 (39.5%) did not. AIC patients had a mean baseline LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.9% (vs. 39.2 ± 7.9% in non-AIC patients; p = 0.9), a significantly lower percentage of fibrosis in the left atrial septal wall (12.2 ± 10.0% vs. 20.7 ± 11.4% in non-AIC patients, p < 0.001). Additionally, LVEF improvement was correlated with lower AF burden post-ablation (r = -0.23, p = 0.02).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nIn this post-hoc analysis of the DECAAF II trial, we found that the majority of patients with LVSD and persistent AF have AIC rather than primary cardiomyopathy. We identified LGE-CMR as a differentiator between AIC and other cardiomyopathies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3684\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3684","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心衰患者心房颤动(AF)消融可降低死亡率和住院率,提高射血分数。心律失常性心肌病(AIC)是在消融后左心室收缩功能完全恢复后诊断的。我们的目的是确定房颤和左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)患者中AIC的患病率和消融前预测因素。方法和结果我们利用DECAAF II数据库,其中815例持续性房颤患者在房颤消融前和消融后3个月接受了晚期钆增强心脏磁共振成像(LGE-CMR)。我们只纳入了具有可用左室射血分数(LVEF)和LVSD的患者。连续监测心房颤动负荷。AIC被定义为在消融后射血分数改善到≥50%的患者中LVSD和房颤共存。我们确定了119例LVSD和房颤患者,平均LVEF为39.1±7.8%,平均基线纤维化为20.0±7.3%。消融后平均房颤负担为16.8±20.2%,平均LVEF恢复为13.9个百分点。72例(60.5%)符合AIC标准,47例(39.5%)不符合AIC标准。AIC患者的平均基线LVEF为39.1±7.9%(非AIC患者为39.2±7.9%;p = 0.9),左房间隔壁纤维化比例显著低于非aic患者(12.2±10.0% vs. 20.7±11.4%,p < 0.001)。此外,LVEF改善与消融后房颤负担降低相关(r = -0.23, p = 0.02)。在这项对DECAAF II试验的事后分析中,我们发现大多数LVSD和持续性房颤患者患有AIC而不是原发性心肌病。我们确定LGE-CMR是AIC和其他心肌病的鉴别指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction - insights from DECAAF II.
AIMS Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in heart failure reduces mortality and hospitalizations and improves ejection fraction. Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is diagnosed after complete recovery of left ventricular systolic function after ablation. We aimed to identify the prevalence and pre-ablation predictors of AIC among patients with AF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS AND RESULTS We utilized the DECAAF II database, where 815 patients with persistent AF underwent late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic-resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) before and 3 months after AF ablation. We only included patients with available left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LVSD. AF burden was continuously monitored. AIC was defined as LVSD and coexisting AF in patients with ejection fraction improvement to ≥50% following ablation. We identified 119 patients with LVSD and AF with a mean LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.8% and mean baseline fibrosis of 20.0 ± 7.3%. Mean AF burden post-ablation was 16.8 ± 20.2%, and mean LVEF recovery was 13.9 percentage points. Seventy-two patients (60.5%) fulfilled the criteria for AIC, and 47 (39.5%) did not. AIC patients had a mean baseline LVEF of 39.1 ± 7.9% (vs. 39.2 ± 7.9% in non-AIC patients; p = 0.9), a significantly lower percentage of fibrosis in the left atrial septal wall (12.2 ± 10.0% vs. 20.7 ± 11.4% in non-AIC patients, p < 0.001). Additionally, LVEF improvement was correlated with lower AF burden post-ablation (r = -0.23, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In this post-hoc analysis of the DECAAF II trial, we found that the majority of patients with LVSD and persistent AF have AIC rather than primary cardiomyopathy. We identified LGE-CMR as a differentiator between AIC and other cardiomyopathies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信