Chloe Y Li,Andrew Massa,Maria Krisch,Neha Gupta,Nilesh Raval,Tavish Nanda,James Lin,Mark P Breazzano,Srilaxmi Bearelly
{"title":"巨细胞病毒血症患者巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎筛查检查的应用。","authors":"Chloe Y Li,Andrew Massa,Maria Krisch,Neha Gupta,Nilesh Raval,Tavish Nanda,James Lin,Mark P Breazzano,Srilaxmi Bearelly","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo determine utility of cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) screening among patients with CMV bloodstream infection (viremia) in the context of multiple and recently implemented state-wide policies in heightening congenital screening.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nRetrospective diagnostic testing evaluation.\r\n\r\nSTUDY POPULATION\r\n- All patients with CMV viremia and ophthalmologic examination during the study period between 2010 and 2023 were included.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\n- Patients with CMV viremia were identified via International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code. Information regarding their demographics and clinical course were collected from respective electronic health records.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)\r\n- Immunocompromising conditions, CMV testing modality, CMV plasma titer, ophthalmic findings, CD4 count, CMVR diagnosis (presumed or confirmed based on direct ocular tissue confirmation), and visual acuity.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n234 patients with CMV viremia and underwent a screening dilated fundus examination during inpatient hospitalization between 2010 and 2019 were identified. 18 (7.7%) patients with CMV viremia were found to have CMVR. Among 49 pediatric patients, 2 (4.1%) had CMVR; zero neonates with congenital infection had CMVR. Five CMVR patients had confirmed ocular CMV infection by aqueous humor testing, while remaining 13 did not and were classified as presumed CMVR cases. Among all CMVR cases, 14 (78%) were symptomatic, while 2 (11%) were asymptomatic and 2 (11%) were unable to report symptoms. Factors associated with increased risk of CMVR diagnosis included: HIV/AIDS infection (unadjusted OR [uOR]: 4.83, 95% CI: 1.76-12.35) and presence of ocular symptoms (uOR: 14.3, 95% CI: 3.6 to 64.4). After adjusting for race, HIV/AIDS infection status, and presence of ocular symptoms, HIV/AIDS infection (adjusted OR [aOR]: 4.12, 95%CI: 1.33 to 14.22) and ocular symptoms (aOR: 14.88, 95% CI: 3.82 to 99.2) remained significantly associated with increased risk of CMVR.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPatients with CMV viremia and HIV/AIDS infection or visual symptoms are at significantly elevated risk of CMVR and should undergo ophthalmic examination. Meanwhile, the utility of DFE in neonates with congenital CMV infection but no clinically observable sequelae of infection is debatable, given the rarity of CMVR while undergoing concurrent systemic treatment in this population. Although larger, prospective studies would be informative, retinal screening in neonates with congenital CMV infection without other clinical signs of infection does not appear supported by these and other recent data.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Screening Examination for CMV Retinitis among Patients with CMV Viremia.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Y Li,Andrew Massa,Maria Krisch,Neha Gupta,Nilesh Raval,Tavish Nanda,James Lin,Mark P Breazzano,Srilaxmi Bearelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nTo determine utility of cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) screening among patients with CMV bloodstream infection (viremia) in the context of multiple and recently implemented state-wide policies in heightening congenital screening.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nRetrospective diagnostic testing evaluation.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY POPULATION\\r\\n- All patients with CMV viremia and ophthalmologic examination during the study period between 2010 and 2023 were included.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\n- Patients with CMV viremia were identified via International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code. Information regarding their demographics and clinical course were collected from respective electronic health records.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)\\r\\n- Immunocompromising conditions, CMV testing modality, CMV plasma titer, ophthalmic findings, CD4 count, CMVR diagnosis (presumed or confirmed based on direct ocular tissue confirmation), and visual acuity.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\n234 patients with CMV viremia and underwent a screening dilated fundus examination during inpatient hospitalization between 2010 and 2019 were identified. 18 (7.7%) patients with CMV viremia were found to have CMVR. Among 49 pediatric patients, 2 (4.1%) had CMVR; zero neonates with congenital infection had CMVR. Five CMVR patients had confirmed ocular CMV infection by aqueous humor testing, while remaining 13 did not and were classified as presumed CMVR cases. Among all CMVR cases, 14 (78%) were symptomatic, while 2 (11%) were asymptomatic and 2 (11%) were unable to report symptoms. Factors associated with increased risk of CMVR diagnosis included: HIV/AIDS infection (unadjusted OR [uOR]: 4.83, 95% CI: 1.76-12.35) and presence of ocular symptoms (uOR: 14.3, 95% CI: 3.6 to 64.4). After adjusting for race, HIV/AIDS infection status, and presence of ocular symptoms, HIV/AIDS infection (adjusted OR [aOR]: 4.12, 95%CI: 1.33 to 14.22) and ocular symptoms (aOR: 14.88, 95% CI: 3.82 to 99.2) remained significantly associated with increased risk of CMVR.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nPatients with CMV viremia and HIV/AIDS infection or visual symptoms are at significantly elevated risk of CMVR and should undergo ophthalmic examination. Meanwhile, the utility of DFE in neonates with congenital CMV infection but no clinically observable sequelae of infection is debatable, given the rarity of CMVR while undergoing concurrent systemic treatment in this population. Although larger, prospective studies would be informative, retinal screening in neonates with congenital CMV infection without other clinical signs of infection does not appear supported by these and other recent data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.039\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.04.039","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utility of Screening Examination for CMV Retinitis among Patients with CMV Viremia.
PURPOSE
To determine utility of cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) screening among patients with CMV bloodstream infection (viremia) in the context of multiple and recently implemented state-wide policies in heightening congenital screening.
DESIGN
Retrospective diagnostic testing evaluation.
STUDY POPULATION
- All patients with CMV viremia and ophthalmologic examination during the study period between 2010 and 2023 were included.
METHODS
- Patients with CMV viremia were identified via International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code. Information regarding their demographics and clinical course were collected from respective electronic health records.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
- Immunocompromising conditions, CMV testing modality, CMV plasma titer, ophthalmic findings, CD4 count, CMVR diagnosis (presumed or confirmed based on direct ocular tissue confirmation), and visual acuity.
RESULTS
234 patients with CMV viremia and underwent a screening dilated fundus examination during inpatient hospitalization between 2010 and 2019 were identified. 18 (7.7%) patients with CMV viremia were found to have CMVR. Among 49 pediatric patients, 2 (4.1%) had CMVR; zero neonates with congenital infection had CMVR. Five CMVR patients had confirmed ocular CMV infection by aqueous humor testing, while remaining 13 did not and were classified as presumed CMVR cases. Among all CMVR cases, 14 (78%) were symptomatic, while 2 (11%) were asymptomatic and 2 (11%) were unable to report symptoms. Factors associated with increased risk of CMVR diagnosis included: HIV/AIDS infection (unadjusted OR [uOR]: 4.83, 95% CI: 1.76-12.35) and presence of ocular symptoms (uOR: 14.3, 95% CI: 3.6 to 64.4). After adjusting for race, HIV/AIDS infection status, and presence of ocular symptoms, HIV/AIDS infection (adjusted OR [aOR]: 4.12, 95%CI: 1.33 to 14.22) and ocular symptoms (aOR: 14.88, 95% CI: 3.82 to 99.2) remained significantly associated with increased risk of CMVR.
CONCLUSION
Patients with CMV viremia and HIV/AIDS infection or visual symptoms are at significantly elevated risk of CMVR and should undergo ophthalmic examination. Meanwhile, the utility of DFE in neonates with congenital CMV infection but no clinically observable sequelae of infection is debatable, given the rarity of CMVR while undergoing concurrent systemic treatment in this population. Although larger, prospective studies would be informative, retinal screening in neonates with congenital CMV infection without other clinical signs of infection does not appear supported by these and other recent data.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.