排水泥炭草原土壤导航工具模型的性能评价与改进

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Clarisse T. Kraamwinkel, Sarah C. Feron, Carmen Vazquez Martin, Rachel E. Creamer, Anne Beaulieu, Wytse de Haan, Yizan Li, Ruth A. Howison
{"title":"排水泥炭草原土壤导航工具模型的性能评价与改进","authors":"Clarisse T. Kraamwinkel,&nbsp;Sarah C. Feron,&nbsp;Carmen Vazquez Martin,&nbsp;Rachel E. Creamer,&nbsp;Anne Beaulieu,&nbsp;Wytse de Haan,&nbsp;Yizan Li,&nbsp;Ruth A. Howison","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Soil Navigator Tool is a decision support system designed for farmers and advisors to assess the capacity of a selected field to perform five soil functions: primary productivity (PP), water regulation (WR), habitat provision (HP), climate regulation (CR), and nutrient cycling (NC). The original tool was developed and validated primarily with mineral soils as the focus. In this paper, we tested and updated the underlying models of the Soil Navigator Tool for the context of drained peat grasslands. The performance of both the original and updated models was evaluated using input and validation data originating from 30 peat grasslands situated in the north of the Netherlands, managed either as semi-natural grassland, organic production grassland, or conventional production grassland. For PP, only minor changes were made to the original model. Both versions produced reasonable assessments with respect to yield. For WR, the sub-function Water Storage (WS) was updated, yielding scores that are more in line with soil moisture measurements from these drained peat grasslands. Only minor changes were applied to the original model of HP. As a result, the performance improved on conventional production grasslands, but the model still struggles to accurately assess semi-natural grasslands. For CR, major changes were applied to the sub-function carbon sequestration (CS) to accurately represent carbon cycling on drained peat. The updated version produced more reasonable outcomes than the original, especially on conventional production and semi-natural grasslands. Despite major changes to the original model of NC, both versions performed poorly, suggesting the need for a completely new model with a depth and time component to accurately account for peat oxidation. Our outcomes suggest that the updated models generally produce more reasonable outcomes than the original models on drained grassland peat. However, more research to further improve and validate the updated models is needed, with a particular focus on NC, before the use of the Soil Navigator Tool on drained grassland peat by farmers or researchers is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating and Improving the Performance of the Models Underlying the Soil Navigator Tool on Drained Peat Grasslands\",\"authors\":\"Clarisse T. Kraamwinkel,&nbsp;Sarah C. Feron,&nbsp;Carmen Vazquez Martin,&nbsp;Rachel E. Creamer,&nbsp;Anne Beaulieu,&nbsp;Wytse de Haan,&nbsp;Yizan Li,&nbsp;Ruth A. Howison\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Soil Navigator Tool is a decision support system designed for farmers and advisors to assess the capacity of a selected field to perform five soil functions: primary productivity (PP), water regulation (WR), habitat provision (HP), climate regulation (CR), and nutrient cycling (NC). The original tool was developed and validated primarily with mineral soils as the focus. In this paper, we tested and updated the underlying models of the Soil Navigator Tool for the context of drained peat grasslands. The performance of both the original and updated models was evaluated using input and validation data originating from 30 peat grasslands situated in the north of the Netherlands, managed either as semi-natural grassland, organic production grassland, or conventional production grassland. For PP, only minor changes were made to the original model. Both versions produced reasonable assessments with respect to yield. For WR, the sub-function Water Storage (WS) was updated, yielding scores that are more in line with soil moisture measurements from these drained peat grasslands. Only minor changes were applied to the original model of HP. As a result, the performance improved on conventional production grasslands, but the model still struggles to accurately assess semi-natural grasslands. For CR, major changes were applied to the sub-function carbon sequestration (CS) to accurately represent carbon cycling on drained peat. The updated version produced more reasonable outcomes than the original, especially on conventional production and semi-natural grasslands. Despite major changes to the original model of NC, both versions performed poorly, suggesting the need for a completely new model with a depth and time component to accurately account for peat oxidation. Our outcomes suggest that the updated models generally produce more reasonable outcomes than the original models on drained grassland peat. However, more research to further improve and validate the updated models is needed, with a particular focus on NC, before the use of the Soil Navigator Tool on drained grassland peat by farmers or researchers is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70117\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70117\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤导航工具是一个决策支持系统,为农民和顾问设计,用于评估选定农田执行五项土壤功能的能力:初级生产力(PP)、水分调节(WR)、栖息地提供(HP)、气候调节(CR)和养分循环(NC)。最初的工具主要以矿物土壤为重点进行开发和验证。在本文中,我们测试和更新了土壤导航工具的基础模型,以排水泥炭草地为背景。使用来自荷兰北部30个泥炭草地的输入数据和验证数据,对原始模型和更新模型的性能进行了评估,这些泥炭草地分为半天然草地、有机生产草地和传统生产草地。对于PP,只对原来的模型做了很小的改动。两个版本都对产量作出了合理的评估。对于WR,更新了子函数Water Storage (WS),得到的分数更符合这些排水泥炭草地的土壤水分测量值。HP的原始模型只做了很小的改动。结果表明,该模型在常规生产草地上的性能有所提高,但在对半自然草地的准确评估方面仍存在困难。对于CR,为了准确地反映排干泥炭的碳循环,对碳固存(CS)子函数进行了重大修改。更新后的结果比原来的结果更合理,特别是在传统生产和半自然草原上。尽管NC的原始模型发生了重大变化,但两个版本都表现不佳,这表明需要一个具有深度和时间成分的全新模型来准确地解释泥炭氧化。我们的结果表明,更新后的模型总体上比原始模型在排水草地泥炭上得到更合理的结果。然而,在建议农民或研究人员将土壤导航工具用于排水草原泥炭之前,需要更多的研究来进一步改进和验证更新的模型,特别是NC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating and Improving the Performance of the Models Underlying the Soil Navigator Tool on Drained Peat Grasslands

The Soil Navigator Tool is a decision support system designed for farmers and advisors to assess the capacity of a selected field to perform five soil functions: primary productivity (PP), water regulation (WR), habitat provision (HP), climate regulation (CR), and nutrient cycling (NC). The original tool was developed and validated primarily with mineral soils as the focus. In this paper, we tested and updated the underlying models of the Soil Navigator Tool for the context of drained peat grasslands. The performance of both the original and updated models was evaluated using input and validation data originating from 30 peat grasslands situated in the north of the Netherlands, managed either as semi-natural grassland, organic production grassland, or conventional production grassland. For PP, only minor changes were made to the original model. Both versions produced reasonable assessments with respect to yield. For WR, the sub-function Water Storage (WS) was updated, yielding scores that are more in line with soil moisture measurements from these drained peat grasslands. Only minor changes were applied to the original model of HP. As a result, the performance improved on conventional production grasslands, but the model still struggles to accurately assess semi-natural grasslands. For CR, major changes were applied to the sub-function carbon sequestration (CS) to accurately represent carbon cycling on drained peat. The updated version produced more reasonable outcomes than the original, especially on conventional production and semi-natural grasslands. Despite major changes to the original model of NC, both versions performed poorly, suggesting the need for a completely new model with a depth and time component to accurately account for peat oxidation. Our outcomes suggest that the updated models generally produce more reasonable outcomes than the original models on drained grassland peat. However, more research to further improve and validate the updated models is needed, with a particular focus on NC, before the use of the Soil Navigator Tool on drained grassland peat by farmers or researchers is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信