一本关于政治化、两极分化、激进化和激活及其在快速技术变革时代对民主的影响的入门书

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Laura G. E. Smith, Emma F. Thomas
{"title":"一本关于政治化、两极分化、激进化和激活及其在快速技术变革时代对民主的影响的入门书","authors":"Laura G. E. Smith,&nbsp;Emma F. Thomas","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Governments around the world fear a loss of social cohesion and a risk of harm to individuals and democratic processes that stem from <i>politicization</i>, <i>polarization</i> and <i>radicalization</i>. We argue that these processes of social influence provide the motivation for—but are not sufficient for—<i>mobilization</i> (the behaviour of engaging in collective action). To be able to <i>collectively act</i>, people require the capability and resources to do so, which can be developed during an <i>activation</i> process. We clarify the common and distinct aspects of each process so the common drivers, but unique effects, can be conceptualized and operationalized by policymakers, practitioners and researchers who wish to understand democratic resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.12903","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A primer on politicization, polarization, radicalization, and activation and their implications for democracy in times of rapid technological change\",\"authors\":\"Laura G. E. Smith,&nbsp;Emma F. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjso.12903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Governments around the world fear a loss of social cohesion and a risk of harm to individuals and democratic processes that stem from <i>politicization</i>, <i>polarization</i> and <i>radicalization</i>. We argue that these processes of social influence provide the motivation for—but are not sufficient for—<i>mobilization</i> (the behaviour of engaging in collective action). To be able to <i>collectively act</i>, people require the capability and resources to do so, which can be developed during an <i>activation</i> process. We clarify the common and distinct aspects of each process so the common drivers, but unique effects, can be conceptualized and operationalized by policymakers, practitioners and researchers who wish to understand democratic resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"64 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.12903\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12903\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各国政府担心,由于政治化、两极分化和激进化,社会凝聚力会丧失,个人和民主进程可能受到伤害。我们认为,这些社会影响过程为动员(参与集体行动的行为)提供了动机,但不是充分的动机。为了能够集体行动,人们需要这样做的能力和资源,这可以在激活过程中开发。我们澄清了每个过程的共同和独特方面,以便决策者、从业者和希望了解民主弹性的研究人员可以概念化和操作共同驱动因素,但独特的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A primer on politicization, polarization, radicalization, and activation and their implications for democracy in times of rapid technological change

Governments around the world fear a loss of social cohesion and a risk of harm to individuals and democratic processes that stem from politicization, polarization and radicalization. We argue that these processes of social influence provide the motivation for—but are not sufficient for—mobilization (the behaviour of engaging in collective action). To be able to collectively act, people require the capability and resources to do so, which can be developed during an activation process. We clarify the common and distinct aspects of each process so the common drivers, but unique effects, can be conceptualized and operationalized by policymakers, practitioners and researchers who wish to understand democratic resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Social Psychology publishes work from scholars based in all parts of the world, and manuscripts that present data on a wide range of populations inside and outside the UK. It publishes original papers in all areas of social psychology including: • social cognition • attitudes • group processes • social influence • intergroup relations • self and identity • nonverbal communication • social psychological aspects of personality, affect and emotion • language and discourse Submissions addressing these topics from a variety of approaches and methods, both quantitative and qualitative are welcomed. We publish papers of the following kinds: • empirical papers that address theoretical issues; • theoretical papers, including analyses of existing social psychological theories and presentations of theoretical innovations, extensions, or integrations; • review papers that provide an evaluation of work within a given area of social psychology and that present proposals for further research in that area; • methodological papers concerning issues that are particularly relevant to a wide range of social psychologists; • an invited agenda article as the first article in the first part of every volume. The editorial team aims to handle papers as efficiently as possible. In 2016, papers were triaged within less than a week, and the average turnaround time from receipt of the manuscript to first decision sent back to the authors was 47 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信