J. Srinivas, M. S. Jagatheeshwaran, S. Vishvanathperumal, A. Elayaperumal
{"title":"纳米粘土和纳米二氧化硅对NR/SBR/NBR三元橡胶纳米复合材料力学性能影响的对比研究","authors":"J. Srinivas, M. S. Jagatheeshwaran, S. Vishvanathperumal, A. Elayaperumal","doi":"10.1007/s10965-025-04411-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The unfilled rubber blends composed of natural rubber (NR), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), and acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR) exhibited inferior properties due to the lack of a reinforcing agent. However, the incorporation of nanofillers significantly improved the strength of the compound. Two nanofillers, nanoclay (NC) and nanosilica (NS), were added to the NR/SBR/NBR blends, which were prepared using an open milling process with nanofiller contents varying from 0 to 10 phr. The use of fine particle-sized fillers required consideration of potential outcomes related to rubber-filler and filler-filler interactions, as well as the varying polarity and composition of the rubber components, which influenced these interactions. To enhance the compatibility between the non-polar and polar rubber phases, 3 phr of Ultrablend 4000 was used. The rubber compound was cured using conventional sulfur vulcanization. Cure characteristic results showed that NC had minimal effect on curing time. The mechanical properties and swelling resistance of the blends compatibilized with Ultrablend 4000 were evaluated using tensile tests, hardness, rebound resilience, abrasion resistance, and mole percent uptake measurements. NS proved to be more effective than NC in enhancing tensile strength, with optimal stress at 100% elongation and tensile strength occurring at 6 phr of NS. Beyond this point, tensile strength decreased due to NS particle agglomeration, which weakened the nanocomposites. Increasing nanofiller content in the NR/SBR/NBR vulcanizates led to improvements in tear strength, hardness, and abrasion resistance, attributed to better filler dispersion and stronger filler-rubber interactions. Notably, NS had a more significant impact on the mechanical properties and swelling resistance of the nanocomposites compared to NC. The percentage increase in tensile strength, stress at 100% elongation, and tear strength of the NR/SBR/NBR nanocomposites shows increases of 154%, 48%, and 155%, respectively, compared to the base vulcanizates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":658,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Polymer Research","volume":"32 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on the influence of nanoclay and nanosilica on the mechanical properties of NR/SBR/NBR ternary rubber nanocomposites\",\"authors\":\"J. Srinivas, M. S. Jagatheeshwaran, S. Vishvanathperumal, A. Elayaperumal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10965-025-04411-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The unfilled rubber blends composed of natural rubber (NR), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), and acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR) exhibited inferior properties due to the lack of a reinforcing agent. However, the incorporation of nanofillers significantly improved the strength of the compound. Two nanofillers, nanoclay (NC) and nanosilica (NS), were added to the NR/SBR/NBR blends, which were prepared using an open milling process with nanofiller contents varying from 0 to 10 phr. The use of fine particle-sized fillers required consideration of potential outcomes related to rubber-filler and filler-filler interactions, as well as the varying polarity and composition of the rubber components, which influenced these interactions. To enhance the compatibility between the non-polar and polar rubber phases, 3 phr of Ultrablend 4000 was used. The rubber compound was cured using conventional sulfur vulcanization. Cure characteristic results showed that NC had minimal effect on curing time. The mechanical properties and swelling resistance of the blends compatibilized with Ultrablend 4000 were evaluated using tensile tests, hardness, rebound resilience, abrasion resistance, and mole percent uptake measurements. NS proved to be more effective than NC in enhancing tensile strength, with optimal stress at 100% elongation and tensile strength occurring at 6 phr of NS. Beyond this point, tensile strength decreased due to NS particle agglomeration, which weakened the nanocomposites. Increasing nanofiller content in the NR/SBR/NBR vulcanizates led to improvements in tear strength, hardness, and abrasion resistance, attributed to better filler dispersion and stronger filler-rubber interactions. Notably, NS had a more significant impact on the mechanical properties and swelling resistance of the nanocomposites compared to NC. The percentage increase in tensile strength, stress at 100% elongation, and tear strength of the NR/SBR/NBR nanocomposites shows increases of 154%, 48%, and 155%, respectively, compared to the base vulcanizates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Polymer Research\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Polymer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10965-025-04411-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLYMER SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Polymer Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10965-025-04411-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study on the influence of nanoclay and nanosilica on the mechanical properties of NR/SBR/NBR ternary rubber nanocomposites
The unfilled rubber blends composed of natural rubber (NR), styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), and acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR) exhibited inferior properties due to the lack of a reinforcing agent. However, the incorporation of nanofillers significantly improved the strength of the compound. Two nanofillers, nanoclay (NC) and nanosilica (NS), were added to the NR/SBR/NBR blends, which were prepared using an open milling process with nanofiller contents varying from 0 to 10 phr. The use of fine particle-sized fillers required consideration of potential outcomes related to rubber-filler and filler-filler interactions, as well as the varying polarity and composition of the rubber components, which influenced these interactions. To enhance the compatibility between the non-polar and polar rubber phases, 3 phr of Ultrablend 4000 was used. The rubber compound was cured using conventional sulfur vulcanization. Cure characteristic results showed that NC had minimal effect on curing time. The mechanical properties and swelling resistance of the blends compatibilized with Ultrablend 4000 were evaluated using tensile tests, hardness, rebound resilience, abrasion resistance, and mole percent uptake measurements. NS proved to be more effective than NC in enhancing tensile strength, with optimal stress at 100% elongation and tensile strength occurring at 6 phr of NS. Beyond this point, tensile strength decreased due to NS particle agglomeration, which weakened the nanocomposites. Increasing nanofiller content in the NR/SBR/NBR vulcanizates led to improvements in tear strength, hardness, and abrasion resistance, attributed to better filler dispersion and stronger filler-rubber interactions. Notably, NS had a more significant impact on the mechanical properties and swelling resistance of the nanocomposites compared to NC. The percentage increase in tensile strength, stress at 100% elongation, and tear strength of the NR/SBR/NBR nanocomposites shows increases of 154%, 48%, and 155%, respectively, compared to the base vulcanizates.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Polymer Research provides a forum for the prompt publication of articles concerning the fundamental and applied research of polymers. Its great feature lies in the diversity of content which it encompasses, drawing together results from all aspects of polymer science and technology.
As polymer research is rapidly growing around the globe, the aim of this journal is to establish itself as a significant information tool not only for the international polymer researchers in academia but also for those working in industry. The scope of the journal covers a wide range of the highly interdisciplinary field of polymer science and technology, including:
polymer synthesis;
polymer reactions;
polymerization kinetics;
polymer physics;
morphology;
structure-property relationships;
polymer analysis and characterization;
physical and mechanical properties;
electrical and optical properties;
polymer processing and rheology;
application of polymers;
supramolecular science of polymers;
polymer composites.