无意见盲立体图像质量评价:一项综合性研究

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Jiebin Yan , Yuming Fang , Xuelin Liu , Wenhui Jiang , Yang Liu
{"title":"无意见盲立体图像质量评价:一项综合性研究","authors":"Jiebin Yan ,&nbsp;Yuming Fang ,&nbsp;Xuelin Liu ,&nbsp;Wenhui Jiang ,&nbsp;Yang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of blind Stereoscopic Image Quality Assessment (SIQA) is hindered by the limited availability of large-scale datasets. Existing SIQA databases typically contain only a few hundred images which are often derived from a small number of original sources. This data scarcity poses a significant challenge, particularly in the deep learning era, as it increases the risk of overfitting. Moreover, it makes performance comparisons of different blind SIQA models unreliable when using publicly available databases. Consequently, determining the best-performing model remains difficult under current evaluation methodologies. To address this limitation and advance SIQA research, we construct the largest and most diverse SIQA database to date which incorporates both image-level coarse labels and single-view pseudo labels. Utilizing this extensive dataset, we have conducted comprehensive study on blind SIQA models, exploring variations in network architecture, input size and auxiliary supervision signals. The representational capabilities of various blind SIQA models and their variants are systematically evaluated under consistent training conditions, specifically pairwise opinion-unaware learning. This new benchmark provides a more reliable platform for comparing blind SIQA models, enabling fairer and more comprehensive assessments of their relative strengths and limitations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49713,"journal":{"name":"Pattern Recognition","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 111749"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinion-unaware blind stereoscopic image quality assessment: A comprehensive study\",\"authors\":\"Jiebin Yan ,&nbsp;Yuming Fang ,&nbsp;Xuelin Liu ,&nbsp;Wenhui Jiang ,&nbsp;Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The development of blind Stereoscopic Image Quality Assessment (SIQA) is hindered by the limited availability of large-scale datasets. Existing SIQA databases typically contain only a few hundred images which are often derived from a small number of original sources. This data scarcity poses a significant challenge, particularly in the deep learning era, as it increases the risk of overfitting. Moreover, it makes performance comparisons of different blind SIQA models unreliable when using publicly available databases. Consequently, determining the best-performing model remains difficult under current evaluation methodologies. To address this limitation and advance SIQA research, we construct the largest and most diverse SIQA database to date which incorporates both image-level coarse labels and single-view pseudo labels. Utilizing this extensive dataset, we have conducted comprehensive study on blind SIQA models, exploring variations in network architecture, input size and auxiliary supervision signals. The representational capabilities of various blind SIQA models and their variants are systematically evaluated under consistent training conditions, specifically pairwise opinion-unaware learning. This new benchmark provides a more reliable platform for comparing blind SIQA models, enabling fairer and more comprehensive assessments of their relative strengths and limitations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pattern Recognition\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pattern Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031320325004091\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pattern Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031320325004091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盲立体图像质量评估(SIQA)的发展受到大规模数据集可用性的限制。现有的SIQA数据库通常只包含几百张图像,这些图像通常来自少数原始来源。这种数据稀缺性带来了重大挑战,特别是在深度学习时代,因为它增加了过拟合的风险。此外,当使用公开可用的数据库时,它使得不同盲SIQA模型的性能比较不可靠。因此,在目前的评估方法下,确定性能最好的模型仍然很困难。为了解决这一限制并推进SIQA研究,我们构建了迄今为止最大和最多样化的SIQA数据库,其中包含图像级粗标签和单视图伪标签。利用这个广泛的数据集,我们对盲SIQA模型进行了全面的研究,探索了网络架构、输入大小和辅助监督信号的变化。在一致的训练条件下,系统地评估了各种盲SIQA模型及其变体的表示能力,特别是成对的意见无意识学习。这个新的基准为比较盲SIQA模型提供了更可靠的平台,能够更公平、更全面地评估它们的相对优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinion-unaware blind stereoscopic image quality assessment: A comprehensive study
The development of blind Stereoscopic Image Quality Assessment (SIQA) is hindered by the limited availability of large-scale datasets. Existing SIQA databases typically contain only a few hundred images which are often derived from a small number of original sources. This data scarcity poses a significant challenge, particularly in the deep learning era, as it increases the risk of overfitting. Moreover, it makes performance comparisons of different blind SIQA models unreliable when using publicly available databases. Consequently, determining the best-performing model remains difficult under current evaluation methodologies. To address this limitation and advance SIQA research, we construct the largest and most diverse SIQA database to date which incorporates both image-level coarse labels and single-view pseudo labels. Utilizing this extensive dataset, we have conducted comprehensive study on blind SIQA models, exploring variations in network architecture, input size and auxiliary supervision signals. The representational capabilities of various blind SIQA models and their variants are systematically evaluated under consistent training conditions, specifically pairwise opinion-unaware learning. This new benchmark provides a more reliable platform for comparing blind SIQA models, enabling fairer and more comprehensive assessments of their relative strengths and limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pattern Recognition
Pattern Recognition 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: The field of Pattern Recognition is both mature and rapidly evolving, playing a crucial role in various related fields such as computer vision, image processing, text analysis, and neural networks. It closely intersects with machine learning and is being applied in emerging areas like biometrics, bioinformatics, multimedia data analysis, and data science. The journal Pattern Recognition, established half a century ago during the early days of computer science, has since grown significantly in scope and influence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信