Jincheng Ren , Feng Li , Fuyou Chen , John W. Olsen , Xing Gao
{"title":"板井子地区的石器技术1:对中国北方中旧石器时代的启示","authors":"Jincheng Ren , Feng Li , Fuyou Chen , John W. Olsen , Xing Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The “Middle Paleolithic” in China has been a topic of contention over the past two decades. Banjingzi Locality 1 (BJZ1) in Hebei province, dated to 108–74 ka BP, has yielded abundant archaeological remains and is interpreted as a significant North Chinese Middle Paleolithic site. This paper focuses on the BJZ1 lithic assemblage, based primarily on materials collected in 2015, with emphasis on raw material utilization, core reduction, and tool manufacture. Stone artifacts from BJZ1 exhibit attributes typical of small flake tool assemblages commonly found in northern China. Various local raw materials were used, with Zhoujiashan chert being extensively exploited for the first time in the Nihewan Basin. Cores were reduced using both unifacial (test cores, casual cores) and bifacial (partial bifacial cores and discoidal cores) methods. Some nuclei exhibit simple preparation of platforms and flaking surfaces. Small and thin flakes were retouched into discrete forms. The dominant tools at BJZ1 comprise a spectrum of scrapers including side, transverse, double, and convergent varieties, along with denticulates, notches, and borers. These tools were mainly made on flakes, chunks, and a few small pebbles, with the majority exhibiting fine retouch. Comparative study demonstrates that the stone artifacts from the Xujiayao-Houjiayao, Lingjing, BJZ1, and Youfangbei sites exhibit notable differences in both core reduction and tool manufacture, reflecting a variety of lithic industries. This study provides new insights into the Middle Paleolithic of China and contributes to revealing the diversity of lithic technology from the late Middle Pleistocene to the early Late Pleistocene in northern China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 105193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lithic technology at Banjingzi Locality 1: Implications for the Middle Paleolithic in northern China\",\"authors\":\"Jincheng Ren , Feng Li , Fuyou Chen , John W. Olsen , Xing Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The “Middle Paleolithic” in China has been a topic of contention over the past two decades. Banjingzi Locality 1 (BJZ1) in Hebei province, dated to 108–74 ka BP, has yielded abundant archaeological remains and is interpreted as a significant North Chinese Middle Paleolithic site. This paper focuses on the BJZ1 lithic assemblage, based primarily on materials collected in 2015, with emphasis on raw material utilization, core reduction, and tool manufacture. Stone artifacts from BJZ1 exhibit attributes typical of small flake tool assemblages commonly found in northern China. Various local raw materials were used, with Zhoujiashan chert being extensively exploited for the first time in the Nihewan Basin. Cores were reduced using both unifacial (test cores, casual cores) and bifacial (partial bifacial cores and discoidal cores) methods. Some nuclei exhibit simple preparation of platforms and flaking surfaces. Small and thin flakes were retouched into discrete forms. The dominant tools at BJZ1 comprise a spectrum of scrapers including side, transverse, double, and convergent varieties, along with denticulates, notches, and borers. These tools were mainly made on flakes, chunks, and a few small pebbles, with the majority exhibiting fine retouch. Comparative study demonstrates that the stone artifacts from the Xujiayao-Houjiayao, Lingjing, BJZ1, and Youfangbei sites exhibit notable differences in both core reduction and tool manufacture, reflecting a variety of lithic industries. This study provides new insights into the Middle Paleolithic of China and contributes to revealing the diversity of lithic technology from the late Middle Pleistocene to the early Late Pleistocene in northern China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25002263\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25002263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去的二十年里,中国的“旧石器时代中期”一直是一个争论不休的话题。河北省板井子1号遗址(BJZ1),距今108-74 ka BP,出土了大量的考古遗迹,被认为是中国北方一个重要的中旧石器时代遗址。本文主要以2015年收集的材料为基础,对BJZ1岩屑组合进行了研究,重点研究了原材料利用、岩芯还原和工具制造。BJZ1的石制器物显示出中国北方常见的小片状工具组合的典型特征。利用当地多种原料,在泥河湾盆地首次广泛开采周家山燧石。采用单面岩心(测试岩心、随意岩心)和双面岩心(部分双面岩心和盘状岩心)方法进行岩心缩减。一些核表现出平台和片状表面的简单制备。小而薄的薄片被修饰成离散的形式。BJZ1的主要工具包括一系列刮刀,包括侧面刮刀、横向刮刀、双面刮刀和会聚刮刀,以及齿状刮刀、缺口刮刀和钻孔刮刀。这些工具主要是在薄片、大块和一些小鹅卵石上制作的,大多数都经过了精细的润饰。对比研究表明,徐家窑-侯家窑、灵井、BJZ1和游方碑遗址的石器制品在岩心还原和工具制造方面存在显著差异,反映了不同的石器产业。该研究为中国中旧石器时代提供了新的认识,有助于揭示中国北方中更新世晚期至晚更新世早期的石器技术多样性。
Lithic technology at Banjingzi Locality 1: Implications for the Middle Paleolithic in northern China
The “Middle Paleolithic” in China has been a topic of contention over the past two decades. Banjingzi Locality 1 (BJZ1) in Hebei province, dated to 108–74 ka BP, has yielded abundant archaeological remains and is interpreted as a significant North Chinese Middle Paleolithic site. This paper focuses on the BJZ1 lithic assemblage, based primarily on materials collected in 2015, with emphasis on raw material utilization, core reduction, and tool manufacture. Stone artifacts from BJZ1 exhibit attributes typical of small flake tool assemblages commonly found in northern China. Various local raw materials were used, with Zhoujiashan chert being extensively exploited for the first time in the Nihewan Basin. Cores were reduced using both unifacial (test cores, casual cores) and bifacial (partial bifacial cores and discoidal cores) methods. Some nuclei exhibit simple preparation of platforms and flaking surfaces. Small and thin flakes were retouched into discrete forms. The dominant tools at BJZ1 comprise a spectrum of scrapers including side, transverse, double, and convergent varieties, along with denticulates, notches, and borers. These tools were mainly made on flakes, chunks, and a few small pebbles, with the majority exhibiting fine retouch. Comparative study demonstrates that the stone artifacts from the Xujiayao-Houjiayao, Lingjing, BJZ1, and Youfangbei sites exhibit notable differences in both core reduction and tool manufacture, reflecting a variety of lithic industries. This study provides new insights into the Middle Paleolithic of China and contributes to revealing the diversity of lithic technology from the late Middle Pleistocene to the early Late Pleistocene in northern China.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.