Xi Tian , Fei Peng , Xin Chen , Guoen Wei , Yujiao Gan , Ziying Zhang , Yaobin Liu
{"title":"中国废旧动力电池管理:进展、政策与挑战","authors":"Xi Tian , Fei Peng , Xin Chen , Guoen Wei , Yujiao Gan , Ziying Zhang , Yaobin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid accumulation of spent power batteries presents critical challenges to global resource circularity and environmental sustainability. As the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) market, China has seen its battery recycling sector garner significant academic attention. However, existing studies have neglected the dynamics of small and medium-sized recyclers, temporal evolution patterns of policy instruments, and cross-disciplinary integration mechanisms. To address these gaps, this study synthesizes fragmented industrial data from 2012 to 2023, encompassing over 54,000 registered recyclers, 50 national policies, and 30 technical standards. Additionally, we propose a five-stage policy evolution framework to compare policy across five nations through seven dimensions. Firstly, the recycling industry shows extensive capacity and network coverage, yet exhibits \"low-capital agglomeration\", with 98 % of enterprises operating below $7 million in registered capital. Secondly, policy frameworks prioritize incentive-based mechanisms over enforcement and have transitioned through three distinct phases: pilot programs (2012–2015), systematization (2016–2019), and industrial restructuring (2020–2024). Key implications for emerging economies include legislative clarification of stakeholder responsibilities, prioritization of labor-intensive disassembly technologies, and adoption of a whitelist certification system to standardize market participation. Thirdly, persistent challenges including structural overcapacity, economic-environmental trade-offs, and supply chain fragmentation remain unresolved. Finally, this study proposes nine research directions that integrate methodologies from computer science, chemistry, anthropology, space science, environmental engineering, and more than 10 other disciplines to address these issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 115797"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of spent power batteries in China: Progress, policies, and challenges\",\"authors\":\"Xi Tian , Fei Peng , Xin Chen , Guoen Wei , Yujiao Gan , Ziying Zhang , Yaobin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid accumulation of spent power batteries presents critical challenges to global resource circularity and environmental sustainability. As the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) market, China has seen its battery recycling sector garner significant academic attention. However, existing studies have neglected the dynamics of small and medium-sized recyclers, temporal evolution patterns of policy instruments, and cross-disciplinary integration mechanisms. To address these gaps, this study synthesizes fragmented industrial data from 2012 to 2023, encompassing over 54,000 registered recyclers, 50 national policies, and 30 technical standards. Additionally, we propose a five-stage policy evolution framework to compare policy across five nations through seven dimensions. Firstly, the recycling industry shows extensive capacity and network coverage, yet exhibits \\\"low-capital agglomeration\\\", with 98 % of enterprises operating below $7 million in registered capital. Secondly, policy frameworks prioritize incentive-based mechanisms over enforcement and have transitioned through three distinct phases: pilot programs (2012–2015), systematization (2016–2019), and industrial restructuring (2020–2024). Key implications for emerging economies include legislative clarification of stakeholder responsibilities, prioritization of labor-intensive disassembly technologies, and adoption of a whitelist certification system to standardize market participation. Thirdly, persistent challenges including structural overcapacity, economic-environmental trade-offs, and supply chain fragmentation remain unresolved. Finally, this study proposes nine research directions that integrate methodologies from computer science, chemistry, anthropology, space science, environmental engineering, and more than 10 other disciplines to address these issues.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115797\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125004708\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125004708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of spent power batteries in China: Progress, policies, and challenges
The rapid accumulation of spent power batteries presents critical challenges to global resource circularity and environmental sustainability. As the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) market, China has seen its battery recycling sector garner significant academic attention. However, existing studies have neglected the dynamics of small and medium-sized recyclers, temporal evolution patterns of policy instruments, and cross-disciplinary integration mechanisms. To address these gaps, this study synthesizes fragmented industrial data from 2012 to 2023, encompassing over 54,000 registered recyclers, 50 national policies, and 30 technical standards. Additionally, we propose a five-stage policy evolution framework to compare policy across five nations through seven dimensions. Firstly, the recycling industry shows extensive capacity and network coverage, yet exhibits "low-capital agglomeration", with 98 % of enterprises operating below $7 million in registered capital. Secondly, policy frameworks prioritize incentive-based mechanisms over enforcement and have transitioned through three distinct phases: pilot programs (2012–2015), systematization (2016–2019), and industrial restructuring (2020–2024). Key implications for emerging economies include legislative clarification of stakeholder responsibilities, prioritization of labor-intensive disassembly technologies, and adoption of a whitelist certification system to standardize market participation. Thirdly, persistent challenges including structural overcapacity, economic-environmental trade-offs, and supply chain fragmentation remain unresolved. Finally, this study proposes nine research directions that integrate methodologies from computer science, chemistry, anthropology, space science, environmental engineering, and more than 10 other disciplines to address these issues.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.