{"title":"电厂碳捕集技术评价的多准则决策分析","authors":"Nima Sepahi, Adrian Ilinca, Daniel R. Rousse","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Power plants are among the largest contributors to CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions, making carbon capture and conversion into valuable products a key strategy to combat climate change and foster a circular economy. However, selecting the optimal CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> capture technology is complex due to the wide range of options — such as pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion — and the various technical, economic, environmental, and social factors involved. This study identifies the most promising CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> capture technologies for three power plant types: Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC), lignite, and coal. By applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which integrates a systematic literature review with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the study ranks existing technologies. For NGCC plants, post-combustion calcium looping emerged as the top choice, with a relative closeness score of 0.790, due to its moderate CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> avoidance cost (€33.80/tCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), high efficiency (48.31%), and mature Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 7. In lignite plants, post-combustion chemical absorption with MDEA ranked highest, achieving a relative closeness of 0.865 and a TRL of 9. For coal plants, pre-combustion using the Selexol process combined with Mn-based chemical looping was most promising, with a relative closeness of 0.829, low CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> avoidance cost (€19.94/tCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), and a net efficiency of 37.13%. These findings underscore the importance of balancing economic performance and technological maturity when selecting CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> capture technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 115699"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria decision analysis for evaluating carbon capture technologies in power plants\",\"authors\":\"Nima Sepahi, Adrian Ilinca, Daniel R. Rousse\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Power plants are among the largest contributors to CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions, making carbon capture and conversion into valuable products a key strategy to combat climate change and foster a circular economy. However, selecting the optimal CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> capture technology is complex due to the wide range of options — such as pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion — and the various technical, economic, environmental, and social factors involved. This study identifies the most promising CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> capture technologies for three power plant types: Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC), lignite, and coal. By applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which integrates a systematic literature review with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the study ranks existing technologies. For NGCC plants, post-combustion calcium looping emerged as the top choice, with a relative closeness score of 0.790, due to its moderate CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> avoidance cost (€33.80/tCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), high efficiency (48.31%), and mature Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 7. In lignite plants, post-combustion chemical absorption with MDEA ranked highest, achieving a relative closeness of 0.865 and a TRL of 9. For coal plants, pre-combustion using the Selexol process combined with Mn-based chemical looping was most promising, with a relative closeness of 0.829, low CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> avoidance cost (€19.94/tCO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), and a net efficiency of 37.13%. These findings underscore the importance of balancing economic performance and technological maturity when selecting CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> capture technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003727\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-criteria decision analysis for evaluating carbon capture technologies in power plants
Power plants are among the largest contributors to CO emissions, making carbon capture and conversion into valuable products a key strategy to combat climate change and foster a circular economy. However, selecting the optimal CO capture technology is complex due to the wide range of options — such as pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion — and the various technical, economic, environmental, and social factors involved. This study identifies the most promising CO capture technologies for three power plant types: Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC), lignite, and coal. By applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), which integrates a systematic literature review with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the study ranks existing technologies. For NGCC plants, post-combustion calcium looping emerged as the top choice, with a relative closeness score of 0.790, due to its moderate CO avoidance cost (€33.80/tCO), high efficiency (48.31%), and mature Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of 7. In lignite plants, post-combustion chemical absorption with MDEA ranked highest, achieving a relative closeness of 0.865 and a TRL of 9. For coal plants, pre-combustion using the Selexol process combined with Mn-based chemical looping was most promising, with a relative closeness of 0.829, low CO avoidance cost (€19.94/tCO), and a net efficiency of 37.13%. These findings underscore the importance of balancing economic performance and technological maturity when selecting CO capture technologies.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.