{"title":"链长蛋氨酸衍生硫代葡萄糖苷超出十字花科的不确定证据","authors":"Niels Agerbirk , Marcus A. Koch","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A literature search for reports of glucosinolates (GSLs) from chain-elongated methionine (ceMet) in plants from the order Brassicales, was carried out taking analytical and botanical quality into account. We prepared an updated Brassicales phylogeny as basis for surveying the distribution of ceMet-derived GSLs. The ceMet-derived GSLs are conclusively known from the crown group family Brassicaceae. Outside Brassicaceae only five reports of decent or good quality were found, and two of them could be dismissed as unconvincing after detailed analysis. The remaining three cases were apparently the only good or decent quality evidence of ceMet-derived GSL outside the Brassicacae, involving MS-detection of 3-butenylGSL and either short or long-chain methylsulfinylalkyl GSLs as minor chromatographic peaks. They were scattered in single accessions of single species from three distant families. These isolated reports need independent, critical confirmation at the highest experimental standards before GSLs from ceMet can be accepted outside the Brassicaceae. Multiple screenings for such GSLs in non-Brassicaceae species were negative, suggesting that this group of GSLs is usually absent from all non-Brassicaceae members of the Brassicales. In contrast, GSLs derived directly from Met without chain elongation are rarely searched for but expectable at low levels from low-specificity biosynthesis throughout the order Brassicales. Future papers reporting ceMet-derived GSLs outside Brassicaeae need to supply conclusive evidence of GSL identity and plant species identity. Proof of biosynthesis from Met requires experiments using isotopically labelled Met or equivalent data. Future reviews of GSL diversity should be transparent regarding conflicts between studies, rather than presenting compiled GSL profiles. For surprising single reports, contamination or parallel evolution should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 105033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inconclusive evidence for chain-elongated methionine-derived glucosinolates beyond the family Brassicaceae\",\"authors\":\"Niels Agerbirk , Marcus A. Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A literature search for reports of glucosinolates (GSLs) from chain-elongated methionine (ceMet) in plants from the order Brassicales, was carried out taking analytical and botanical quality into account. We prepared an updated Brassicales phylogeny as basis for surveying the distribution of ceMet-derived GSLs. The ceMet-derived GSLs are conclusively known from the crown group family Brassicaceae. Outside Brassicaceae only five reports of decent or good quality were found, and two of them could be dismissed as unconvincing after detailed analysis. The remaining three cases were apparently the only good or decent quality evidence of ceMet-derived GSL outside the Brassicacae, involving MS-detection of 3-butenylGSL and either short or long-chain methylsulfinylalkyl GSLs as minor chromatographic peaks. They were scattered in single accessions of single species from three distant families. These isolated reports need independent, critical confirmation at the highest experimental standards before GSLs from ceMet can be accepted outside the Brassicaceae. Multiple screenings for such GSLs in non-Brassicaceae species were negative, suggesting that this group of GSLs is usually absent from all non-Brassicaceae members of the Brassicales. In contrast, GSLs derived directly from Met without chain elongation are rarely searched for but expectable at low levels from low-specificity biosynthesis throughout the order Brassicales. Future papers reporting ceMet-derived GSLs outside Brassicaeae need to supply conclusive evidence of GSL identity and plant species identity. Proof of biosynthesis from Met requires experiments using isotopically labelled Met or equivalent data. Future reviews of GSL diversity should be transparent regarding conflicts between studies, rather than presenting compiled GSL profiles. For surprising single reports, contamination or parallel evolution should be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197825000821\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197825000821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inconclusive evidence for chain-elongated methionine-derived glucosinolates beyond the family Brassicaceae
A literature search for reports of glucosinolates (GSLs) from chain-elongated methionine (ceMet) in plants from the order Brassicales, was carried out taking analytical and botanical quality into account. We prepared an updated Brassicales phylogeny as basis for surveying the distribution of ceMet-derived GSLs. The ceMet-derived GSLs are conclusively known from the crown group family Brassicaceae. Outside Brassicaceae only five reports of decent or good quality were found, and two of them could be dismissed as unconvincing after detailed analysis. The remaining three cases were apparently the only good or decent quality evidence of ceMet-derived GSL outside the Brassicacae, involving MS-detection of 3-butenylGSL and either short or long-chain methylsulfinylalkyl GSLs as minor chromatographic peaks. They were scattered in single accessions of single species from three distant families. These isolated reports need independent, critical confirmation at the highest experimental standards before GSLs from ceMet can be accepted outside the Brassicaceae. Multiple screenings for such GSLs in non-Brassicaceae species were negative, suggesting that this group of GSLs is usually absent from all non-Brassicaceae members of the Brassicales. In contrast, GSLs derived directly from Met without chain elongation are rarely searched for but expectable at low levels from low-specificity biosynthesis throughout the order Brassicales. Future papers reporting ceMet-derived GSLs outside Brassicaeae need to supply conclusive evidence of GSL identity and plant species identity. Proof of biosynthesis from Met requires experiments using isotopically labelled Met or equivalent data. Future reviews of GSL diversity should be transparent regarding conflicts between studies, rather than presenting compiled GSL profiles. For surprising single reports, contamination or parallel evolution should be considered.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.