链长蛋氨酸衍生硫代葡萄糖苷超出十字花科的不确定证据

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Niels Agerbirk , Marcus A. Koch
{"title":"链长蛋氨酸衍生硫代葡萄糖苷超出十字花科的不确定证据","authors":"Niels Agerbirk ,&nbsp;Marcus A. Koch","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A literature search for reports of glucosinolates (GSLs) from chain-elongated methionine (ceMet) in plants from the order Brassicales, was carried out taking analytical and botanical quality into account. We prepared an updated Brassicales phylogeny as basis for surveying the distribution of ceMet-derived GSLs. The ceMet-derived GSLs are conclusively known from the crown group family Brassicaceae. Outside Brassicaceae only five reports of decent or good quality were found, and two of them could be dismissed as unconvincing after detailed analysis. The remaining three cases were apparently the only good or decent quality evidence of ceMet-derived GSL outside the Brassicacae, involving MS-detection of 3-butenylGSL and either short or long-chain methylsulfinylalkyl GSLs as minor chromatographic peaks. They were scattered in single accessions of single species from three distant families. These isolated reports need independent, critical confirmation at the highest experimental standards before GSLs from ceMet can be accepted outside the Brassicaceae. Multiple screenings for such GSLs in non-Brassicaceae species were negative, suggesting that this group of GSLs is usually absent from all non-Brassicaceae members of the Brassicales. In contrast, GSLs derived directly from Met without chain elongation are rarely searched for but expectable at low levels from low-specificity biosynthesis throughout the order Brassicales. Future papers reporting ceMet-derived GSLs outside Brassicaeae need to supply conclusive evidence of GSL identity and plant species identity. Proof of biosynthesis from Met requires experiments using isotopically labelled Met or equivalent data. Future reviews of GSL diversity should be transparent regarding conflicts between studies, rather than presenting compiled GSL profiles. For surprising single reports, contamination or parallel evolution should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 105033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inconclusive evidence for chain-elongated methionine-derived glucosinolates beyond the family Brassicaceae\",\"authors\":\"Niels Agerbirk ,&nbsp;Marcus A. Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A literature search for reports of glucosinolates (GSLs) from chain-elongated methionine (ceMet) in plants from the order Brassicales, was carried out taking analytical and botanical quality into account. We prepared an updated Brassicales phylogeny as basis for surveying the distribution of ceMet-derived GSLs. The ceMet-derived GSLs are conclusively known from the crown group family Brassicaceae. Outside Brassicaceae only five reports of decent or good quality were found, and two of them could be dismissed as unconvincing after detailed analysis. The remaining three cases were apparently the only good or decent quality evidence of ceMet-derived GSL outside the Brassicacae, involving MS-detection of 3-butenylGSL and either short or long-chain methylsulfinylalkyl GSLs as minor chromatographic peaks. They were scattered in single accessions of single species from three distant families. These isolated reports need independent, critical confirmation at the highest experimental standards before GSLs from ceMet can be accepted outside the Brassicaceae. Multiple screenings for such GSLs in non-Brassicaceae species were negative, suggesting that this group of GSLs is usually absent from all non-Brassicaceae members of the Brassicales. In contrast, GSLs derived directly from Met without chain elongation are rarely searched for but expectable at low levels from low-specificity biosynthesis throughout the order Brassicales. Future papers reporting ceMet-derived GSLs outside Brassicaeae need to supply conclusive evidence of GSL identity and plant species identity. Proof of biosynthesis from Met requires experiments using isotopically labelled Met or equivalent data. Future reviews of GSL diversity should be transparent regarding conflicts between studies, rather than presenting compiled GSL profiles. For surprising single reports, contamination or parallel evolution should be considered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197825000821\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197825000821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对芸苔目植物中从链长蛋氨酸(ceMet)中提取的硫代葡萄糖苷(GSLs)进行了文献检索,并结合分析和植物学质量进行了分析。我们编制了一个更新的芸苔属植物系统发育表,作为调查cemet衍生GSLs分布的基础。cemet衍生的GSLs是从十字花科冠群中确定的。除芸苔科外,仅有5份质量尚可或较好的报告,其中2份在详细分析后可因缺乏说服力而不予考虑。其余3例显然是油菜科植物以外的cemet衍生GSL的唯一良好或较好的质量证据,包括ms检测3-丁烯基GSL和短链或长链甲基亚砜烷基GSL作为次要色谱峰。它们分散在来自三个远亲科的单一物种的单一种群中。这些孤立的报告需要在最高的实验标准下进行独立的、关键的确认,然后才能接受来自ceMet的gsl。这类GSLs在非芸苔科物种中的多次筛选结果均为阴性,表明这类GSLs通常在芸苔科所有非芸苔科成员中都不存在。相比之下,直接从Met衍生而来的没有链延伸的GSLs很少被搜索,但在整个芸苔目的低特异性生物合成中,GSLs的水平很低。未来报道苔科外cemet衍生GSL的论文需要提供GSL鉴定和植物物种鉴定的确凿证据。证明Met的生物合成需要使用同位素标记的Met或等效数据进行实验。未来对GSL多样性的评估应该对研究之间的冲突保持透明,而不是提供汇编的GSL概况。对于令人惊讶的单一报告,应考虑污染或平行进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inconclusive evidence for chain-elongated methionine-derived glucosinolates beyond the family Brassicaceae

Inconclusive evidence for chain-elongated methionine-derived glucosinolates beyond the family Brassicaceae
A literature search for reports of glucosinolates (GSLs) from chain-elongated methionine (ceMet) in plants from the order Brassicales, was carried out taking analytical and botanical quality into account. We prepared an updated Brassicales phylogeny as basis for surveying the distribution of ceMet-derived GSLs. The ceMet-derived GSLs are conclusively known from the crown group family Brassicaceae. Outside Brassicaceae only five reports of decent or good quality were found, and two of them could be dismissed as unconvincing after detailed analysis. The remaining three cases were apparently the only good or decent quality evidence of ceMet-derived GSL outside the Brassicacae, involving MS-detection of 3-butenylGSL and either short or long-chain methylsulfinylalkyl GSLs as minor chromatographic peaks. They were scattered in single accessions of single species from three distant families. These isolated reports need independent, critical confirmation at the highest experimental standards before GSLs from ceMet can be accepted outside the Brassicaceae. Multiple screenings for such GSLs in non-Brassicaceae species were negative, suggesting that this group of GSLs is usually absent from all non-Brassicaceae members of the Brassicales. In contrast, GSLs derived directly from Met without chain elongation are rarely searched for but expectable at low levels from low-specificity biosynthesis throughout the order Brassicales. Future papers reporting ceMet-derived GSLs outside Brassicaeae need to supply conclusive evidence of GSL identity and plant species identity. Proof of biosynthesis from Met requires experiments using isotopically labelled Met or equivalent data. Future reviews of GSL diversity should be transparent regarding conflicts between studies, rather than presenting compiled GSL profiles. For surprising single reports, contamination or parallel evolution should be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信