{"title":"与豆粕相比,发酵豆粕和大豆浓缩蛋白具有更高的消化能,但氨基酸消化率相近","authors":"Yoon Soo Song, Beob Gyun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective was to determine energy concentrations and amino acid (AA) digestibility in soybean meal (SBM), 3 sources of fermented SBM (FSBM), and soy protein concentrate (SPC) fed to weanling pigs. In experiment 1, twelve barrows (initial body weight = 8.7 kg ± 0.5) were used to measure digestible energy and metabolizable energy (ME) in the soybean products in a replicated 6 × 4 incomplete Latin square design. A basal diet consisted of 969 g/kg corn as the sole energy source. Five experimental diets were formulated by replacing corn in the basal diet with SBM at 310 g/kg, FSBM-A at 270 g/kg, FSBM-B at 260 g/kg, FSBM-C at 290 g/kg, and SPC at 240 g/kg. In experiment 2, ten barrows (initial body weight = 10.5 kg ± 0.9) equipped with a T-cannula at the distal ileum were employed to determine standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design. Five experimental diets contained SBM, 3 sources of FSBM, or SPC as the sole source of AA. The index method was employed for determining AA digestibility. The ME in FSBM-A and FSBM-B was greater (P < 0.05) compared with SBM but not different from the ME in FSBM-C or SPC. The SID of most AA in the 3 sources of FSBM was comparable to SBM or SPC. Overall, 2 of the FSBM sources had greater energy values compared with SBM but did not have different SID of AA compared with SBM or SPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 116382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fermented soybean meal and soy protein concentrate had greater digestible energy but similar amino acid digestibility compared with soybean meal fed to weanling pigs\",\"authors\":\"Yoon Soo Song, Beob Gyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The objective was to determine energy concentrations and amino acid (AA) digestibility in soybean meal (SBM), 3 sources of fermented SBM (FSBM), and soy protein concentrate (SPC) fed to weanling pigs. In experiment 1, twelve barrows (initial body weight = 8.7 kg ± 0.5) were used to measure digestible energy and metabolizable energy (ME) in the soybean products in a replicated 6 × 4 incomplete Latin square design. A basal diet consisted of 969 g/kg corn as the sole energy source. Five experimental diets were formulated by replacing corn in the basal diet with SBM at 310 g/kg, FSBM-A at 270 g/kg, FSBM-B at 260 g/kg, FSBM-C at 290 g/kg, and SPC at 240 g/kg. In experiment 2, ten barrows (initial body weight = 10.5 kg ± 0.9) equipped with a T-cannula at the distal ileum were employed to determine standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design. Five experimental diets contained SBM, 3 sources of FSBM, or SPC as the sole source of AA. The index method was employed for determining AA digestibility. The ME in FSBM-A and FSBM-B was greater (P < 0.05) compared with SBM but not different from the ME in FSBM-C or SPC. The SID of most AA in the 3 sources of FSBM was comparable to SBM or SPC. Overall, 2 of the FSBM sources had greater energy values compared with SBM but did not have different SID of AA compared with SBM or SPC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"326 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001774\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001774","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fermented soybean meal and soy protein concentrate had greater digestible energy but similar amino acid digestibility compared with soybean meal fed to weanling pigs
The objective was to determine energy concentrations and amino acid (AA) digestibility in soybean meal (SBM), 3 sources of fermented SBM (FSBM), and soy protein concentrate (SPC) fed to weanling pigs. In experiment 1, twelve barrows (initial body weight = 8.7 kg ± 0.5) were used to measure digestible energy and metabolizable energy (ME) in the soybean products in a replicated 6 × 4 incomplete Latin square design. A basal diet consisted of 969 g/kg corn as the sole energy source. Five experimental diets were formulated by replacing corn in the basal diet with SBM at 310 g/kg, FSBM-A at 270 g/kg, FSBM-B at 260 g/kg, FSBM-C at 290 g/kg, and SPC at 240 g/kg. In experiment 2, ten barrows (initial body weight = 10.5 kg ± 0.9) equipped with a T-cannula at the distal ileum were employed to determine standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design. Five experimental diets contained SBM, 3 sources of FSBM, or SPC as the sole source of AA. The index method was employed for determining AA digestibility. The ME in FSBM-A and FSBM-B was greater (P < 0.05) compared with SBM but not different from the ME in FSBM-C or SPC. The SID of most AA in the 3 sources of FSBM was comparable to SBM or SPC. Overall, 2 of the FSBM sources had greater energy values compared with SBM but did not have different SID of AA compared with SBM or SPC.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.