与豆粕相比,发酵豆粕和大豆浓缩蛋白具有更高的消化能,但氨基酸消化率相近

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Yoon Soo Song, Beob Gyun Kim
{"title":"与豆粕相比,发酵豆粕和大豆浓缩蛋白具有更高的消化能,但氨基酸消化率相近","authors":"Yoon Soo Song,&nbsp;Beob Gyun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective was to determine energy concentrations and amino acid (AA) digestibility in soybean meal (SBM), 3 sources of fermented SBM (FSBM), and soy protein concentrate (SPC) fed to weanling pigs. In experiment 1, twelve barrows (initial body weight = 8.7 kg ± 0.5) were used to measure digestible energy and metabolizable energy (ME) in the soybean products in a replicated 6 × 4 incomplete Latin square design. A basal diet consisted of 969 g/kg corn as the sole energy source. Five experimental diets were formulated by replacing corn in the basal diet with SBM at 310 g/kg, FSBM-A at 270 g/kg, FSBM-B at 260 g/kg, FSBM-C at 290 g/kg, and SPC at 240 g/kg. In experiment 2, ten barrows (initial body weight = 10.5 kg ± 0.9) equipped with a T-cannula at the distal ileum were employed to determine standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design. Five experimental diets contained SBM, 3 sources of FSBM, or SPC as the sole source of AA. The index method was employed for determining AA digestibility. The ME in FSBM-A and FSBM-B was greater (P &lt; 0.05) compared with SBM but not different from the ME in FSBM-C or SPC. The SID of most AA in the 3 sources of FSBM was comparable to SBM or SPC. Overall, 2 of the FSBM sources had greater energy values compared with SBM but did not have different SID of AA compared with SBM or SPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 116382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fermented soybean meal and soy protein concentrate had greater digestible energy but similar amino acid digestibility compared with soybean meal fed to weanling pigs\",\"authors\":\"Yoon Soo Song,&nbsp;Beob Gyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The objective was to determine energy concentrations and amino acid (AA) digestibility in soybean meal (SBM), 3 sources of fermented SBM (FSBM), and soy protein concentrate (SPC) fed to weanling pigs. In experiment 1, twelve barrows (initial body weight = 8.7 kg ± 0.5) were used to measure digestible energy and metabolizable energy (ME) in the soybean products in a replicated 6 × 4 incomplete Latin square design. A basal diet consisted of 969 g/kg corn as the sole energy source. Five experimental diets were formulated by replacing corn in the basal diet with SBM at 310 g/kg, FSBM-A at 270 g/kg, FSBM-B at 260 g/kg, FSBM-C at 290 g/kg, and SPC at 240 g/kg. In experiment 2, ten barrows (initial body weight = 10.5 kg ± 0.9) equipped with a T-cannula at the distal ileum were employed to determine standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design. Five experimental diets contained SBM, 3 sources of FSBM, or SPC as the sole source of AA. The index method was employed for determining AA digestibility. The ME in FSBM-A and FSBM-B was greater (P &lt; 0.05) compared with SBM but not different from the ME in FSBM-C or SPC. The SID of most AA in the 3 sources of FSBM was comparable to SBM or SPC. Overall, 2 of the FSBM sources had greater energy values compared with SBM but did not have different SID of AA compared with SBM or SPC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"326 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001774\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001774","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验旨在测定断奶仔猪饲喂豆粕(SBM)、3种发酵豆粕(FSBM)和大豆浓缩蛋白(SPC)的能量浓度和氨基酸消化率。试验1采用6 × 4不完全拉丁方设计,选取初始体重为8.7 kg± 0.5的12头母猪,测定豆制品的消化能和代谢能(ME)。基础饲粮以969 g/kg玉米为唯一能量来源。以310 g/kg的SBM、270 g/kg的FSBM-A、260 g/kg的FSBM-B、290 g/kg的FSBM-C和240 g/kg的SPC代替基础饲粮中的玉米配制5种试验饲粮。试验2采用5 × 5拉丁方重复设计,选取10头初始体重= 10.5 kg± 0.9的公羊,在回肠远端安装t型套管,测定AA的标准化回肠消化率(SID)。5种试验饲粮分别添加SBM、3种FSBM来源或SPC作为AA的唯一来源。采用指数法测定AA消化率。FSBM-A和FSBM-B的代谢能高于SBM (P <; 0.05),但与FSBM-C或SPC的代谢能无显著差异。3种FSBM源中大多数AA的SID与SBM或SPC相当。总的来说,2种FSBM源比SBM具有更高的能量值,但与SBM或SPC相比,AA的SID没有不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fermented soybean meal and soy protein concentrate had greater digestible energy but similar amino acid digestibility compared with soybean meal fed to weanling pigs
The objective was to determine energy concentrations and amino acid (AA) digestibility in soybean meal (SBM), 3 sources of fermented SBM (FSBM), and soy protein concentrate (SPC) fed to weanling pigs. In experiment 1, twelve barrows (initial body weight = 8.7 kg ± 0.5) were used to measure digestible energy and metabolizable energy (ME) in the soybean products in a replicated 6 × 4 incomplete Latin square design. A basal diet consisted of 969 g/kg corn as the sole energy source. Five experimental diets were formulated by replacing corn in the basal diet with SBM at 310 g/kg, FSBM-A at 270 g/kg, FSBM-B at 260 g/kg, FSBM-C at 290 g/kg, and SPC at 240 g/kg. In experiment 2, ten barrows (initial body weight = 10.5 kg ± 0.9) equipped with a T-cannula at the distal ileum were employed to determine standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA in a replicated 5 × 5 Latin square design. Five experimental diets contained SBM, 3 sources of FSBM, or SPC as the sole source of AA. The index method was employed for determining AA digestibility. The ME in FSBM-A and FSBM-B was greater (P < 0.05) compared with SBM but not different from the ME in FSBM-C or SPC. The SID of most AA in the 3 sources of FSBM was comparable to SBM or SPC. Overall, 2 of the FSBM sources had greater energy values compared with SBM but did not have different SID of AA compared with SBM or SPC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信