{"title":"用邻里劣势解释共享单车使用差异:一个分解分析","authors":"Eun Jin Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite growing evidence of spatial inequities in bike-share usage, contributing factors remain underexplored.<!--> <!-->This study investigated differences in bike-share trip density between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged neighborhoods in Chicago and used the Gelbach decomposition method to identify underlying drivers. Findings revealed that both traditional bike and electric bike trips occurred less frequently in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Gelbach’s decomposition indicated that, regardless of bike type, bike infrastructure was the most critical driver of this spatial inequity, with the built environment and socioeconomic/demographic factors also contributing. Specifically, alongside bike-share station dock density, the lack of on-road bicycle lanes in disadvantaged neighborhoods contributed to the inequitable distribution of both bike types. However, lower public bike rack density and higher violent crime rates in disadvantaged neighborhoods were exclusively linked to fewer e-bike trips, whereas the lack of rail stations and limited access to cellular data plans uniquely drove inequity in traditional bike trips.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104803"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining disparities in bike-share usage by neighborhood disadvantage: A decomposition analysis\",\"authors\":\"Eun Jin Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite growing evidence of spatial inequities in bike-share usage, contributing factors remain underexplored.<!--> <!-->This study investigated differences in bike-share trip density between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged neighborhoods in Chicago and used the Gelbach decomposition method to identify underlying drivers. Findings revealed that both traditional bike and electric bike trips occurred less frequently in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Gelbach’s decomposition indicated that, regardless of bike type, bike infrastructure was the most critical driver of this spatial inequity, with the built environment and socioeconomic/demographic factors also contributing. Specifically, alongside bike-share station dock density, the lack of on-road bicycle lanes in disadvantaged neighborhoods contributed to the inequitable distribution of both bike types. However, lower public bike rack density and higher violent crime rates in disadvantaged neighborhoods were exclusively linked to fewer e-bike trips, whereas the lack of rail stations and limited access to cellular data plans uniquely drove inequity in traditional bike trips.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"145 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002135\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925002135","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Explaining disparities in bike-share usage by neighborhood disadvantage: A decomposition analysis
Despite growing evidence of spatial inequities in bike-share usage, contributing factors remain underexplored. This study investigated differences in bike-share trip density between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged neighborhoods in Chicago and used the Gelbach decomposition method to identify underlying drivers. Findings revealed that both traditional bike and electric bike trips occurred less frequently in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Gelbach’s decomposition indicated that, regardless of bike type, bike infrastructure was the most critical driver of this spatial inequity, with the built environment and socioeconomic/demographic factors also contributing. Specifically, alongside bike-share station dock density, the lack of on-road bicycle lanes in disadvantaged neighborhoods contributed to the inequitable distribution of both bike types. However, lower public bike rack density and higher violent crime rates in disadvantaged neighborhoods were exclusively linked to fewer e-bike trips, whereas the lack of rail stations and limited access to cellular data plans uniquely drove inequity in traditional bike trips.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.