肠脂肪酸结合蛋白作为难治性心脏骤停患者预后和非闭塞性肠系膜缺血的标志物:一项初步研究

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jana Smalcova , Lahoda Helena Brodska , Jacky Suen , Zdislava Vanickova , Petra Kavalkova , Nicole White , Barbora Kolosova , Hideaki Nonaka , Jan Pudil , Eva Svobodova , Martin Balik , Jan Malik , Jan Belohlavek
{"title":"肠脂肪酸结合蛋白作为难治性心脏骤停患者预后和非闭塞性肠系膜缺血的标志物:一项初步研究","authors":"Jana Smalcova ,&nbsp;Lahoda Helena Brodska ,&nbsp;Jacky Suen ,&nbsp;Zdislava Vanickova ,&nbsp;Petra Kavalkova ,&nbsp;Nicole White ,&nbsp;Barbora Kolosova ,&nbsp;Hideaki Nonaka ,&nbsp;Jan Pudil ,&nbsp;Eva Svobodova ,&nbsp;Martin Balik ,&nbsp;Jan Malik ,&nbsp;Jan Belohlavek","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The neurological prognostication is crucial for the management of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Despite treatment advances, ischemia–reperfusion brain injury remains a critical factor affecting neurological outcomes. This study evaluated the utility of intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) and its relationship with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) for neurological prognostication, comparing patients with refractory cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) compared to those treated with conventional CPR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single-center prospective pilot study. We compared I-FABP levels in OHCA patients recruited from June 2022 to October 2023. Blood samples for I-FABP examination were collected at admission, 24, and 48 h and analyzed against 30-day neurological outcomes and NOMI occurrence. ROC analysis determined I-FABP cut-off values for predicting poor neurological outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 3–5) in ECPR and CPR groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 68 patients admitted for OHCA, 22 received ECPR and 46 conventional CPR. I-FABP cut-off values for predicting poor neurological outcomes were: at admission &gt; 0.95 ng/mL for ECPR vs. 1.64 ng/mL for CPR (AUC 0.55 vs. 0.38); at 24 h &gt; 0.04 ng/mL vs. 0.4 ng/mL (AUC 0.7 vs. 0.51); at 48 h &gt; 0.18 ng/mL vs. 0.53 ng/mL (AUC 0.77 vs. 0.41). However, compared to NSE AUCs, I-FABP showed significantly worse outcomes prediction in all time points.</div><div>I-FABP was unreliable in predicting neurological outcomes and also showed no consistent elevation in NOMI patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared to neuron-specific enolase, I-FABP does not appear to be a predictor of outcome in patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Clinical manifestations of NOMI are not consistently associated with elevated I-FABP levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100972"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein as a marker of prognosis and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in refractory cardiac arrest patients: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Jana Smalcova ,&nbsp;Lahoda Helena Brodska ,&nbsp;Jacky Suen ,&nbsp;Zdislava Vanickova ,&nbsp;Petra Kavalkova ,&nbsp;Nicole White ,&nbsp;Barbora Kolosova ,&nbsp;Hideaki Nonaka ,&nbsp;Jan Pudil ,&nbsp;Eva Svobodova ,&nbsp;Martin Balik ,&nbsp;Jan Malik ,&nbsp;Jan Belohlavek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The neurological prognostication is crucial for the management of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Despite treatment advances, ischemia–reperfusion brain injury remains a critical factor affecting neurological outcomes. This study evaluated the utility of intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) and its relationship with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) for neurological prognostication, comparing patients with refractory cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) compared to those treated with conventional CPR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single-center prospective pilot study. We compared I-FABP levels in OHCA patients recruited from June 2022 to October 2023. Blood samples for I-FABP examination were collected at admission, 24, and 48 h and analyzed against 30-day neurological outcomes and NOMI occurrence. ROC analysis determined I-FABP cut-off values for predicting poor neurological outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 3–5) in ECPR and CPR groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 68 patients admitted for OHCA, 22 received ECPR and 46 conventional CPR. I-FABP cut-off values for predicting poor neurological outcomes were: at admission &gt; 0.95 ng/mL for ECPR vs. 1.64 ng/mL for CPR (AUC 0.55 vs. 0.38); at 24 h &gt; 0.04 ng/mL vs. 0.4 ng/mL (AUC 0.7 vs. 0.51); at 48 h &gt; 0.18 ng/mL vs. 0.53 ng/mL (AUC 0.77 vs. 0.41). However, compared to NSE AUCs, I-FABP showed significantly worse outcomes prediction in all time points.</div><div>I-FABP was unreliable in predicting neurological outcomes and also showed no consistent elevation in NOMI patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Compared to neuron-specific enolase, I-FABP does not appear to be a predictor of outcome in patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Clinical manifestations of NOMI are not consistently associated with elevated I-FABP levels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经系统预后对难治性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的治疗至关重要。尽管治疗进展,脑缺血再灌注损伤仍然是影响神经预后的关键因素。本研究评估了肠脂肪酸结合蛋白(I-FABP)及其与非闭塞性肠系膜缺血(NOMI)在神经系统预后中的作用,比较了体外心肺复苏(ECPR)和常规心肺复苏(CPR)治疗的难治性心脏骤停患者。方法本研究为单中心前瞻性先导研究。我们比较了2022年6月至2023年10月招募的OHCA患者的I-FABP水平。入院时、24小时和48小时采集血液样本进行I-FABP检查,并分析30天神经预后和NOMI发生情况。ROC分析确定了预测ECPR和CPR组不良神经预后(脑功能分类(CPC) 3-5)的I-FABP截断值。结果68例OHCA患者中,22例行ECPR, 46例行常规CPR。预测神经预后不良的I-FABP临界值为:入院时;ECPR 0.95 ng/mL vs. CPR 1.64 ng/mL (AUC 0.55 vs. 0.38);24小时>;0.04 ng/mL vs. 0.4 ng/mL (AUC 0.7 vs. 0.51);48小时;0.18 ng/mL vs. 0.53 ng/mL (AUC 0.77 vs. 0.41)。然而,与NSE auc相比,I-FABP在所有时间点的预后预测都明显较差。I-FABP在预测神经预后方面是不可靠的,并且在NOMI患者中也没有一致的升高。结论与神经元特异性烯醇化酶相比,I-FABP似乎不是难治性心脏骤停患者预后的预测因子。NOMI的临床表现与I-FABP水平升高并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein as a marker of prognosis and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in refractory cardiac arrest patients: a pilot study

Background

The neurological prognostication is crucial for the management of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Despite treatment advances, ischemia–reperfusion brain injury remains a critical factor affecting neurological outcomes. This study evaluated the utility of intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) and its relationship with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) for neurological prognostication, comparing patients with refractory cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) compared to those treated with conventional CPR.

Methods

This is a single-center prospective pilot study. We compared I-FABP levels in OHCA patients recruited from June 2022 to October 2023. Blood samples for I-FABP examination were collected at admission, 24, and 48 h and analyzed against 30-day neurological outcomes and NOMI occurrence. ROC analysis determined I-FABP cut-off values for predicting poor neurological outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 3–5) in ECPR and CPR groups.

Results

Among the 68 patients admitted for OHCA, 22 received ECPR and 46 conventional CPR. I-FABP cut-off values for predicting poor neurological outcomes were: at admission > 0.95 ng/mL for ECPR vs. 1.64 ng/mL for CPR (AUC 0.55 vs. 0.38); at 24 h > 0.04 ng/mL vs. 0.4 ng/mL (AUC 0.7 vs. 0.51); at 48 h > 0.18 ng/mL vs. 0.53 ng/mL (AUC 0.77 vs. 0.41). However, compared to NSE AUCs, I-FABP showed significantly worse outcomes prediction in all time points.
I-FABP was unreliable in predicting neurological outcomes and also showed no consistent elevation in NOMI patients.

Conclusion

Compared to neuron-specific enolase, I-FABP does not appear to be a predictor of outcome in patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Clinical manifestations of NOMI are not consistently associated with elevated I-FABP levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信