两种非晶硅粉对硬红春小麦物理力学性能的影响

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Selladurai Manivannan, Bhadriraju Subramanyam, Kaliramesh Siliveru
{"title":"两种非晶硅粉对硬红春小麦物理力学性能的影响","authors":"Selladurai Manivannan,&nbsp;Bhadriraju Subramanyam,&nbsp;Kaliramesh Siliveru","doi":"10.1016/j.jspr.2025.102671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing awareness among consumers regarding chemical-free food consumption has driven the popularity of diatomaceous earths. While research on their efficacy for stored product protection is on the rise, the widespread adoption of diatomaceous earths as grain protectants is limited due to their negative impacts on treated grain physical properties. This study explores the effects of two amorphous silica powders from Imery's, Lompoc, CA, USA, designated as 1 and 2, on the physical properties and flowability of wheat grains. Wheat grains treated with 0.35 g/kg of silica powder 1 or silica powder 2 were evaluated for grain quality immediately after treatment (0 month), and after 1 and 3 months. Results revealed a significant decrease in bulk density and an increase in tapped density of wheat with prolonged exposure of 3 months to silica powders 1 and 2. The angle of repose, Carr index, and Hausner Ratio values were notably higher for silica powder-treated grains after 3 months compared to the untreated control. FT4 powder rheometer analysis indicated that silica powder-treated wheat displayed increased basic flow energy, aeration ratio, and reduced stability, Despite a decline in grain quality observed after 3 months of exposure to these powders, the overall grain quality and flowability remained acceptable. The findings suggest that silica powders 1 and 2 exhibit potential as grain protectants with minimal adverse effects on grain quality and flowability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stored Products Research","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of two amorphous silica powders on the physio-mechanical properties of hard red spring wheat over time\",\"authors\":\"Selladurai Manivannan,&nbsp;Bhadriraju Subramanyam,&nbsp;Kaliramesh Siliveru\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jspr.2025.102671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The growing awareness among consumers regarding chemical-free food consumption has driven the popularity of diatomaceous earths. While research on their efficacy for stored product protection is on the rise, the widespread adoption of diatomaceous earths as grain protectants is limited due to their negative impacts on treated grain physical properties. This study explores the effects of two amorphous silica powders from Imery's, Lompoc, CA, USA, designated as 1 and 2, on the physical properties and flowability of wheat grains. Wheat grains treated with 0.35 g/kg of silica powder 1 or silica powder 2 were evaluated for grain quality immediately after treatment (0 month), and after 1 and 3 months. Results revealed a significant decrease in bulk density and an increase in tapped density of wheat with prolonged exposure of 3 months to silica powders 1 and 2. The angle of repose, Carr index, and Hausner Ratio values were notably higher for silica powder-treated grains after 3 months compared to the untreated control. FT4 powder rheometer analysis indicated that silica powder-treated wheat displayed increased basic flow energy, aeration ratio, and reduced stability, Despite a decline in grain quality observed after 3 months of exposure to these powders, the overall grain quality and flowability remained acceptable. The findings suggest that silica powders 1 and 2 exhibit potential as grain protectants with minimal adverse effects on grain quality and flowability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stored Products Research\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stored Products Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X25001304\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stored Products Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X25001304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消费者对无化学物质食品消费的意识日益增强,这推动了硅藻土的普及。虽然关于硅藻土对储藏产品保护功效的研究越来越多,但硅藻土作为谷物保护剂的广泛采用受到限制,因为它们对处理后的谷物物理性质有负面影响。本研究探讨了两种非晶二氧化硅粉末(分别为1和2)对小麦颗粒物理性质和流动性的影响。以0.35 g/kg二氧化硅粉1或二氧化硅粉2处理小麦籽粒,分别在处理后第0个月、第1个月和第3个月对籽粒品质进行评价。结果表明,硅粉1和硅粉2处理3个月后,小麦的容重显著降低,出穗密度显著增加。3个月后,二氧化硅粉处理的颗粒的休止角、Carr指数和Hausner比值值明显高于未处理的对照。FT4粉末流变仪分析表明,二氧化硅粉处理小麦的基本流动能增加,通气率增加,稳定性降低,尽管暴露于二氧化硅粉3个月后籽粒质量下降,但总体籽粒质量和流动性仍可接受。研究结果表明,二氧化硅粉1和二氧化硅粉2具有作为谷物保护剂的潜力,对谷物质量和流动性的不利影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of two amorphous silica powders on the physio-mechanical properties of hard red spring wheat over time
The growing awareness among consumers regarding chemical-free food consumption has driven the popularity of diatomaceous earths. While research on their efficacy for stored product protection is on the rise, the widespread adoption of diatomaceous earths as grain protectants is limited due to their negative impacts on treated grain physical properties. This study explores the effects of two amorphous silica powders from Imery's, Lompoc, CA, USA, designated as 1 and 2, on the physical properties and flowability of wheat grains. Wheat grains treated with 0.35 g/kg of silica powder 1 or silica powder 2 were evaluated for grain quality immediately after treatment (0 month), and after 1 and 3 months. Results revealed a significant decrease in bulk density and an increase in tapped density of wheat with prolonged exposure of 3 months to silica powders 1 and 2. The angle of repose, Carr index, and Hausner Ratio values were notably higher for silica powder-treated grains after 3 months compared to the untreated control. FT4 powder rheometer analysis indicated that silica powder-treated wheat displayed increased basic flow energy, aeration ratio, and reduced stability, Despite a decline in grain quality observed after 3 months of exposure to these powders, the overall grain quality and flowability remained acceptable. The findings suggest that silica powders 1 and 2 exhibit potential as grain protectants with minimal adverse effects on grain quality and flowability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
18.50%
发文量
112
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stored Products Research provides an international medium for the publication of both reviews and original results from laboratory and field studies on the preservation and safety of stored products, notably food stocks, covering storage-related problems from the producer through the supply chain to the consumer. Stored products are characterised by having relatively low moisture content and include raw and semi-processed foods, animal feedstuffs, and a range of other durable items, including materials such as clothing or museum artefacts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信