社区药房的抗生素配药实践:资源受限环境下抗菌药物管理的意义

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Abdullah Al Masud , Ramesh Lahiru Walpola , Malabika Sarker , Muhammad Asaduzzaman , Md. Saiful Islam , Ayesha Tasnim Mostafa , Zubair Akhtar , Alamgir Kabir , Holly Seale
{"title":"社区药房的抗生素配药实践:资源受限环境下抗菌药物管理的意义","authors":"Abdullah Al Masud ,&nbsp;Ramesh Lahiru Walpola ,&nbsp;Malabika Sarker ,&nbsp;Muhammad Asaduzzaman ,&nbsp;Md. Saiful Islam ,&nbsp;Ayesha Tasnim Mostafa ,&nbsp;Zubair Akhtar ,&nbsp;Alamgir Kabir ,&nbsp;Holly Seale","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Over-the-counter antibiotic sales in community-pharmacies significantly drive antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to inappropriate use and early treatment discontinuation. In Bangladesh, community pharmacies, which dispense 56.6 % of antibiotics without prescriptions, serve as the first health-seeking touchpoint, yet conventional stewardship strategies often overlook these informal providers, heightening AMR risks. This study examines drug-sellers' understanding and practices towards antibiotic dispensing and compares their symptomatic-treatment practices with Bangladesh's Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) to understand the extent of antibiotic misuse.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey in two urban and two rural areas of Bangladesh involved 120 drug-sellers from 30 randomly selected pharmacies per site. Knowledge was compared between drug-sellers with pharmacy-dispensing training and those without training, and their suggested treatments for two simulated health-symptoms—upper respiratory-tract and gastrointestinal infections—were evaluated against STGs to determine the extent of misuse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most drug-sellers were aged 41–50 years (35.0 %), with 39.2 % holding a bachelor's degree or higher, and 65.8 % having pharmacy-dispensing training. The overall knowledge score on antibiotic use and AMR was moderate at 60.2 % (5–7 out of 10), with 32.5 % scoring ≤4, indicating poor knowledge; trained drug-sellers scored significantly better (<em>p</em> = 0.008). Over half (57.5 %) were unaware of antibiotic dispensing policies, though most (75.8 %) acknowledged the link between AMR and antibiotic use. For simulated upper respiratory-tract infections, 54.2 % recommended single antibiotic-90.8 % Watch, 9.2 % Access (per WHO-AWaRe classification)-with 66.2 % of these prescriptions deviating from guidelines due to inappropriate selection or dosage. For gastrointestinal infections, 55.8 % recommended single antibiotic (40.3 % Watch, 59.7 % Access), with 82.1 % deviated from the guidelines. Additionally, 26.7 % recommended two antibiotics (51.6 % Watch, 48.4 % Access), all of which were inconsistent with guideline recommendations. For both simulated symptoms, no significant difference was observed in drug sellers' treatment practices based on their knowledge level.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the need for context-specific policies and regulatory measures in informal healthcare settings. While improving drug-sellers' knowledge is vital for antimicrobial stewardship in LMICs like Bangladesh, it alone is insufficient due to market competition, weak regulation, and patient-driven demand. Thus, curbing inappropriate antibiotic use at the community level requires stronger enforcement and multifaceted, context-tailored interventions—including public awareness, targeted training, and market-responsive strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic dispensing practices in community pharmacies: Implications for antimicrobial stewardship in resource-constrained settings\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Al Masud ,&nbsp;Ramesh Lahiru Walpola ,&nbsp;Malabika Sarker ,&nbsp;Muhammad Asaduzzaman ,&nbsp;Md. Saiful Islam ,&nbsp;Ayesha Tasnim Mostafa ,&nbsp;Zubair Akhtar ,&nbsp;Alamgir Kabir ,&nbsp;Holly Seale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Over-the-counter antibiotic sales in community-pharmacies significantly drive antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to inappropriate use and early treatment discontinuation. In Bangladesh, community pharmacies, which dispense 56.6 % of antibiotics without prescriptions, serve as the first health-seeking touchpoint, yet conventional stewardship strategies often overlook these informal providers, heightening AMR risks. This study examines drug-sellers' understanding and practices towards antibiotic dispensing and compares their symptomatic-treatment practices with Bangladesh's Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) to understand the extent of antibiotic misuse.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey in two urban and two rural areas of Bangladesh involved 120 drug-sellers from 30 randomly selected pharmacies per site. Knowledge was compared between drug-sellers with pharmacy-dispensing training and those without training, and their suggested treatments for two simulated health-symptoms—upper respiratory-tract and gastrointestinal infections—were evaluated against STGs to determine the extent of misuse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most drug-sellers were aged 41–50 years (35.0 %), with 39.2 % holding a bachelor's degree or higher, and 65.8 % having pharmacy-dispensing training. The overall knowledge score on antibiotic use and AMR was moderate at 60.2 % (5–7 out of 10), with 32.5 % scoring ≤4, indicating poor knowledge; trained drug-sellers scored significantly better (<em>p</em> = 0.008). Over half (57.5 %) were unaware of antibiotic dispensing policies, though most (75.8 %) acknowledged the link between AMR and antibiotic use. For simulated upper respiratory-tract infections, 54.2 % recommended single antibiotic-90.8 % Watch, 9.2 % Access (per WHO-AWaRe classification)-with 66.2 % of these prescriptions deviating from guidelines due to inappropriate selection or dosage. For gastrointestinal infections, 55.8 % recommended single antibiotic (40.3 % Watch, 59.7 % Access), with 82.1 % deviated from the guidelines. Additionally, 26.7 % recommended two antibiotics (51.6 % Watch, 48.4 % Access), all of which were inconsistent with guideline recommendations. For both simulated symptoms, no significant difference was observed in drug sellers' treatment practices based on their knowledge level.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the need for context-specific policies and regulatory measures in informal healthcare settings. While improving drug-sellers' knowledge is vital for antimicrobial stewardship in LMICs like Bangladesh, it alone is insufficient due to market competition, weak regulation, and patient-driven demand. Thus, curbing inappropriate antibiotic use at the community level requires stronger enforcement and multifaceted, context-tailored interventions—including public awareness, targeted training, and market-responsive strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在低收入和中等收入国家,由于不当使用和早期停止治疗,社区药房的非处方抗生素销售显著推动了抗菌素耐药性。在孟加拉国,社区药房作为第一个就医接触点,在没有处方的情况下分发56.6%的抗生素,但传统的管理战略往往忽视了这些非正式提供者,从而加剧了抗生素耐药性风险。本研究考察了药品销售商对抗生素配药的理解和做法,并将其对症治疗做法与孟加拉国的标准治疗指南(STGs)进行了比较,以了解抗生素滥用的程度。方法在孟加拉国两个城市和两个农村地区进行横断面调查,随机抽取30家药店的120名药品销售者。研究人员比较了接受过配药培训和没有接受过培训的药品销售商的知识水平,并根据STGs评估了他们对两种模拟健康症状(上呼吸道感染和胃肠道感染)的建议治疗方法,以确定滥用的程度。结果药品销售人员年龄以41 ~ 50岁为主(35.0%),本科及以上学历占39.2%,接受过调剂培训的占65.8%。抗生素使用和抗菌素耐药性的总体知识得分中等,为60.2%(5-7分),其中32.5%得分≤4分,表明知识贫乏;训练有素的药品销售者得分显著高于训练有素的药品销售者(p = 0.008)。超过一半(57.5%)的人不知道抗生素配药政策,尽管大多数(75.8%)承认抗生素耐药性与抗生素使用之间存在联系。对于模拟上呼吸道感染,54.2%的人推荐使用单一抗生素——90.8%的人使用观察,9.2%的人使用可及性(按世卫组织《全球环境意识》分类)——其中66.2%的处方由于选择或剂量不当而偏离指南。对于胃肠道感染,55.8%推荐单一抗生素(40.3%观察,59.7%获取),82.1%偏离指南。此外,26.7%推荐两种抗生素(51.6%观察,48.4%获取),所有这些都与指南建议不一致。对于两种模拟症状,药品销售者在不同知识水平下的治疗行为均无显著差异。结论:本研究强调了在非正式卫生保健环境中需要有针对性的政策和监管措施。虽然提高药品销售商的知识对孟加拉国等中低收入国家的抗微生物药物管理至关重要,但由于市场竞争、监管不力和患者驱动的需求,仅凭这一点是不够的。因此,在社区层面遏制抗生素的不当使用需要更强有力的执法和多方面的、因时制宜的干预措施,包括公众意识、有针对性的培训和市场反应战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibiotic dispensing practices in community pharmacies: Implications for antimicrobial stewardship in resource-constrained settings

Background

Over-the-counter antibiotic sales in community-pharmacies significantly drive antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to inappropriate use and early treatment discontinuation. In Bangladesh, community pharmacies, which dispense 56.6 % of antibiotics without prescriptions, serve as the first health-seeking touchpoint, yet conventional stewardship strategies often overlook these informal providers, heightening AMR risks. This study examines drug-sellers' understanding and practices towards antibiotic dispensing and compares their symptomatic-treatment practices with Bangladesh's Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) to understand the extent of antibiotic misuse.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey in two urban and two rural areas of Bangladesh involved 120 drug-sellers from 30 randomly selected pharmacies per site. Knowledge was compared between drug-sellers with pharmacy-dispensing training and those without training, and their suggested treatments for two simulated health-symptoms—upper respiratory-tract and gastrointestinal infections—were evaluated against STGs to determine the extent of misuse.

Results

Most drug-sellers were aged 41–50 years (35.0 %), with 39.2 % holding a bachelor's degree or higher, and 65.8 % having pharmacy-dispensing training. The overall knowledge score on antibiotic use and AMR was moderate at 60.2 % (5–7 out of 10), with 32.5 % scoring ≤4, indicating poor knowledge; trained drug-sellers scored significantly better (p = 0.008). Over half (57.5 %) were unaware of antibiotic dispensing policies, though most (75.8 %) acknowledged the link between AMR and antibiotic use. For simulated upper respiratory-tract infections, 54.2 % recommended single antibiotic-90.8 % Watch, 9.2 % Access (per WHO-AWaRe classification)-with 66.2 % of these prescriptions deviating from guidelines due to inappropriate selection or dosage. For gastrointestinal infections, 55.8 % recommended single antibiotic (40.3 % Watch, 59.7 % Access), with 82.1 % deviated from the guidelines. Additionally, 26.7 % recommended two antibiotics (51.6 % Watch, 48.4 % Access), all of which were inconsistent with guideline recommendations. For both simulated symptoms, no significant difference was observed in drug sellers' treatment practices based on their knowledge level.

Conclusion

This study highlights the need for context-specific policies and regulatory measures in informal healthcare settings. While improving drug-sellers' knowledge is vital for antimicrobial stewardship in LMICs like Bangladesh, it alone is insufficient due to market competition, weak regulation, and patient-driven demand. Thus, curbing inappropriate antibiotic use at the community level requires stronger enforcement and multifaceted, context-tailored interventions—including public awareness, targeted training, and market-responsive strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信