J. Parsons , M.S. Lopes , Monica Mezzalama , J. Riudavets
{"title":"生物防治对两种贮藏玉米基因型害虫存活及黄曲霉的影响","authors":"J. Parsons , M.S. Lopes , Monica Mezzalama , J. Riudavets","doi":"10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During storage, maize is attacked by various insect pests that damage its seeds and reduce their quality. A promising approach to control these pests is the use of natural enemies. However, there is limited knowledge about how natural enemies interact with different maize genotypes or generations. Additionally, the presence of storage pests often creates favorable conditions for <em>Aspergillus flavus</em>, one of the most common storage fungi. This study evaluates the biological control of three common storage pests: <em>Sitotroga cerealella, Sitophilus zeamais,</em> and <em>Oryzaephilus surinamensis</em>, by their respective natural enemies: <em>Blattisocius tarsalis, Anisopteromalus calandrae,</em> and <em>Cephalonomia tarsalis.</em> It examines how these biocontrol agents impact pest survival, kernel damage and <em>A. flavus</em> conidia count. These traits are compared across two commercial maize genotypes: a transgenic genotype expressing the insecticidal Cry1Ab protein and its non-transgenic near-isoline counterpart. Commercial seeds are used for both genotypes (F1), along with seeds obtained from field-grown transgenic and near-isoline plants (F2). Our findings demonstrated that natural enemies effectively reduced pest populations and pest-induced kernel damage, particularly in the F2 transgenic genotypes. The presence of <em>A. flavus</em> increased with kernel damage and rising pest populations; however, natural enemies suppressed fungal activity by reducing pest numbers, thereby improving kernel quality. Overall, these findings support the potential of an integrated pest management strategy combining transgenic resistance with biological control to manage pests and <em>A. flavus</em>, thus enhancing maize quality and safety during storage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8880,"journal":{"name":"Biological Control","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 105791"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of biological control on pest survival and Aspergillus flavus in two stored maize genotypes\",\"authors\":\"J. Parsons , M.S. Lopes , Monica Mezzalama , J. Riudavets\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>During storage, maize is attacked by various insect pests that damage its seeds and reduce their quality. A promising approach to control these pests is the use of natural enemies. However, there is limited knowledge about how natural enemies interact with different maize genotypes or generations. Additionally, the presence of storage pests often creates favorable conditions for <em>Aspergillus flavus</em>, one of the most common storage fungi. This study evaluates the biological control of three common storage pests: <em>Sitotroga cerealella, Sitophilus zeamais,</em> and <em>Oryzaephilus surinamensis</em>, by their respective natural enemies: <em>Blattisocius tarsalis, Anisopteromalus calandrae,</em> and <em>Cephalonomia tarsalis.</em> It examines how these biocontrol agents impact pest survival, kernel damage and <em>A. flavus</em> conidia count. These traits are compared across two commercial maize genotypes: a transgenic genotype expressing the insecticidal Cry1Ab protein and its non-transgenic near-isoline counterpart. Commercial seeds are used for both genotypes (F1), along with seeds obtained from field-grown transgenic and near-isoline plants (F2). Our findings demonstrated that natural enemies effectively reduced pest populations and pest-induced kernel damage, particularly in the F2 transgenic genotypes. The presence of <em>A. flavus</em> increased with kernel damage and rising pest populations; however, natural enemies suppressed fungal activity by reducing pest numbers, thereby improving kernel quality. Overall, these findings support the potential of an integrated pest management strategy combining transgenic resistance with biological control to manage pests and <em>A. flavus</em>, thus enhancing maize quality and safety during storage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Control\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104996442500101X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Control","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104996442500101X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of biological control on pest survival and Aspergillus flavus in two stored maize genotypes
During storage, maize is attacked by various insect pests that damage its seeds and reduce their quality. A promising approach to control these pests is the use of natural enemies. However, there is limited knowledge about how natural enemies interact with different maize genotypes or generations. Additionally, the presence of storage pests often creates favorable conditions for Aspergillus flavus, one of the most common storage fungi. This study evaluates the biological control of three common storage pests: Sitotroga cerealella, Sitophilus zeamais, and Oryzaephilus surinamensis, by their respective natural enemies: Blattisocius tarsalis, Anisopteromalus calandrae, and Cephalonomia tarsalis. It examines how these biocontrol agents impact pest survival, kernel damage and A. flavus conidia count. These traits are compared across two commercial maize genotypes: a transgenic genotype expressing the insecticidal Cry1Ab protein and its non-transgenic near-isoline counterpart. Commercial seeds are used for both genotypes (F1), along with seeds obtained from field-grown transgenic and near-isoline plants (F2). Our findings demonstrated that natural enemies effectively reduced pest populations and pest-induced kernel damage, particularly in the F2 transgenic genotypes. The presence of A. flavus increased with kernel damage and rising pest populations; however, natural enemies suppressed fungal activity by reducing pest numbers, thereby improving kernel quality. Overall, these findings support the potential of an integrated pest management strategy combining transgenic resistance with biological control to manage pests and A. flavus, thus enhancing maize quality and safety during storage.
期刊介绍:
Biological control is an environmentally sound and effective means of reducing or mitigating pests and pest effects through the use of natural enemies. The aim of Biological Control is to promote this science and technology through publication of original research articles and reviews of research and theory. The journal devotes a section to reports on biotechnologies dealing with the elucidation and use of genes or gene products for the enhancement of biological control agents.
The journal encompasses biological control of viral, microbial, nematode, insect, mite, weed, and vertebrate pests in agriculture, aquatic, forest, natural resource, stored product, and urban environments. Biological control of arthropod pests of human and domestic animals is also included. Ecological, molecular, and biotechnological approaches to the understanding of biological control are welcome.