{"title":"基于评分系统的冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱激发试验阳性方法","authors":"Yoshiyuki Ohnaga MD , Yuichi Saito MD , Yuichiro Mori MD , Ken Kato MD , Kazuya Tateishi MD , Hideki Kitahara MD , Yoshio Kobayashi MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation testing is a guideline-recommended invasive standard for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VSA), ACh tests are largely underused in clinical practice globally. Recently, the ABCD score, consisting of clinical presentation, myocardial bridge, C-reactive protein, and dyslipidemia, was developed to predict positive ACh test results.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The authors aimed to externally validate the diagnostic ability of the score and attempted to improve the predictivity for identifying patients with VSA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From May 2012 to September 2023, a total of 723 patients undergoing ACh provocation tests for diagnosing VSA were included. The original ABCD score was calculated according to the predefined criteria, and the modified ABCD score was internally developed to improve the diagnostic accuracy. The positive ACh provocation test (ie, VSA) was defined as a significant angiographic vasospasm accompanied by chest pain and/or ischemic electrocardiographic changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 723 patients, 383 (53.0%) had positive ACh provocation test results. The receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis indicated that the original ABCD score was significantly predictive of positive ACh tests. Using best cutoff values on receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses, we developed the modified ABCD score, which was simpler than the original score. The modified rather than original ABCD score had better diagnostic ability for positive ACh test results (area under the curve 0.65 vs 0.55; <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The original ABCD score was predictive of VSA in this external validation study with modest diagnostic accuracy, while the modified ABCD score achieved better predictivity for identifying patients with VSA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 6","pages":"Article 101790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoring System-Based Approach for Positive Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Tests\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiyuki Ohnaga MD , Yuichi Saito MD , Yuichiro Mori MD , Ken Kato MD , Kazuya Tateishi MD , Hideki Kitahara MD , Yoshio Kobayashi MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation testing is a guideline-recommended invasive standard for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VSA), ACh tests are largely underused in clinical practice globally. Recently, the ABCD score, consisting of clinical presentation, myocardial bridge, C-reactive protein, and dyslipidemia, was developed to predict positive ACh test results.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The authors aimed to externally validate the diagnostic ability of the score and attempted to improve the predictivity for identifying patients with VSA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From May 2012 to September 2023, a total of 723 patients undergoing ACh provocation tests for diagnosing VSA were included. The original ABCD score was calculated according to the predefined criteria, and the modified ABCD score was internally developed to improve the diagnostic accuracy. The positive ACh provocation test (ie, VSA) was defined as a significant angiographic vasospasm accompanied by chest pain and/or ischemic electrocardiographic changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 723 patients, 383 (53.0%) had positive ACh provocation test results. The receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis indicated that the original ABCD score was significantly predictive of positive ACh tests. Using best cutoff values on receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses, we developed the modified ABCD score, which was simpler than the original score. The modified rather than original ABCD score had better diagnostic ability for positive ACh test results (area under the curve 0.65 vs 0.55; <em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The original ABCD score was predictive of VSA in this external validation study with modest diagnostic accuracy, while the modified ABCD score achieved better predictivity for identifying patients with VSA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC advances\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X2500208X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X2500208X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱(ACh)激发试验是一种指南推荐的诊断血管痉挛性心绞痛(VSA)的侵入性标准,但ACh试验在全球临床实践中大多未得到充分应用。最近,ABCD评分由临床表现、心肌桥、c反应蛋白和血脂异常组成,用于预测乙酰胆碱检测阳性结果。目的:从外部验证评分的诊断能力,并试图提高VSA患者的预测能力。方法选取2012年5月至2023年9月接受乙酰胆碱激发试验诊断VSA的723例患者。原始ABCD评分根据预定义标准计算,内部制定修改后的ABCD评分,以提高诊断准确性。乙酰胆碱激发试验阳性(即VSA)定义为明显的血管痉挛伴胸痛和/或缺血性心电图改变。结果723例患者中,ACh激发试验阳性383例(53.0%)。受体-工作特征曲线分析表明,原始ABCD评分可显著预测ACh检测阳性。通过对患者工作特征曲线的最佳截止值分析,我们开发了比原始评分更简单的改进ABCD评分。修改后的ABCD评分对ACh阳性结果的诊断能力优于原始ABCD评分(曲线下面积0.65 vs 0.55;P & lt;0.001)。结论:在这项外部验证研究中,原始ABCD评分可以预测VSA的诊断准确性,而修改后的ABCD评分在识别VSA患者方面具有更好的预测能力。
Scoring System-Based Approach for Positive Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Tests
Background
Although intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation testing is a guideline-recommended invasive standard for the diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VSA), ACh tests are largely underused in clinical practice globally. Recently, the ABCD score, consisting of clinical presentation, myocardial bridge, C-reactive protein, and dyslipidemia, was developed to predict positive ACh test results.
Objectives
The authors aimed to externally validate the diagnostic ability of the score and attempted to improve the predictivity for identifying patients with VSA.
Methods
From May 2012 to September 2023, a total of 723 patients undergoing ACh provocation tests for diagnosing VSA were included. The original ABCD score was calculated according to the predefined criteria, and the modified ABCD score was internally developed to improve the diagnostic accuracy. The positive ACh provocation test (ie, VSA) was defined as a significant angiographic vasospasm accompanied by chest pain and/or ischemic electrocardiographic changes.
Results
Of the 723 patients, 383 (53.0%) had positive ACh provocation test results. The receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis indicated that the original ABCD score was significantly predictive of positive ACh tests. Using best cutoff values on receiver-operating characteristics curve analyses, we developed the modified ABCD score, which was simpler than the original score. The modified rather than original ABCD score had better diagnostic ability for positive ACh test results (area under the curve 0.65 vs 0.55; P < 0.001).
Conclusions
The original ABCD score was predictive of VSA in this external validation study with modest diagnostic accuracy, while the modified ABCD score achieved better predictivity for identifying patients with VSA.