弥合知识技能差距:大语言模型和批判性思维在教育中的作用

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jin Yuxian
{"title":"弥合知识技能差距:大语言模型和批判性思维在教育中的作用","authors":"Jin Yuxian","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the dynamic field of education, addressing the knowledge-skill gap remains a significant challenge, as students often excel in theoretical understanding but struggle with practical application. This study investigates the combined effects of the large language model (LLM) chatbot and critical thinking guidance on learners' acquisition of declarative knowledge (“know what”) and procedural knowledge (“know how”). Findings indicate that while the LLM chatbot enhances declarative knowledge acquisition, it does not significantly impact procedural learning, as learners tend to prioritize lower cognitive load and focus on declarative knowledge. In contrast, critical thinking guidance fosters procedural learning but increases cognitive load, thereby limiting resources available for declarative learning. However, when both interventions are combined, they generate synergistic effects—critical thinking guidance activates procedural learning, while the LLM chatbot mitigates cognitive burden, enabling a more balanced allocation of cognitive resources and improving both declarative and procedural knowledge acquisition. These findings highlight the potential of LLM chatbots as effective educational tools, suggesting that the strategic use of artificial intelligence can promote a more effective approach to knowledge acquisition. This research provides valuable insights into the application of advanced technologies in educational contexts, emphasizing the importance of appropriate instructional strategies to guide the effective use of these technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 105357"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the knowledge-skill gap: The role of large language model and critical thinking in education\",\"authors\":\"Jin Yuxian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the dynamic field of education, addressing the knowledge-skill gap remains a significant challenge, as students often excel in theoretical understanding but struggle with practical application. This study investigates the combined effects of the large language model (LLM) chatbot and critical thinking guidance on learners' acquisition of declarative knowledge (“know what”) and procedural knowledge (“know how”). Findings indicate that while the LLM chatbot enhances declarative knowledge acquisition, it does not significantly impact procedural learning, as learners tend to prioritize lower cognitive load and focus on declarative knowledge. In contrast, critical thinking guidance fosters procedural learning but increases cognitive load, thereby limiting resources available for declarative learning. However, when both interventions are combined, they generate synergistic effects—critical thinking guidance activates procedural learning, while the LLM chatbot mitigates cognitive burden, enabling a more balanced allocation of cognitive resources and improving both declarative and procedural knowledge acquisition. These findings highlight the potential of LLM chatbots as effective educational tools, suggesting that the strategic use of artificial intelligence can promote a more effective approach to knowledge acquisition. This research provides valuable insights into the application of advanced technologies in educational contexts, emphasizing the importance of appropriate instructional strategies to guide the effective use of these technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"235 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525001253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525001253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在充满活力的教育领域,解决知识技能差距仍然是一个重大挑战,因为学生往往在理论理解方面表现出色,但在实际应用方面却表现不佳。本研究探讨了大型语言模型(LLM)聊天机器人和批判性思维指导对学习者获得陈述性知识(“知道什么”)和程序性知识(“知道如何”)的综合影响。研究结果表明,虽然LLM聊天机器人增强了陈述性知识的获取,但它对程序学习没有显著影响,因为学习者倾向于优先考虑较低的认知负荷,并专注于陈述性知识。相反,批判性思维指导促进程序性学习,但增加了认知负荷,从而限制了陈述性学习的可用资源。然而,当这两种干预相结合时,它们会产生协同效应——批判性思维引导激活了程序学习,而LLM聊天机器人减轻了认知负担,使认知资源的分配更加平衡,并提高了陈述性和程序性知识的获取。这些发现突出了法学硕士聊天机器人作为有效教育工具的潜力,表明人工智能的战略性使用可以促进更有效的知识获取方法。这项研究为先进技术在教育环境中的应用提供了有价值的见解,强调了适当的教学策略对指导这些技术的有效使用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the knowledge-skill gap: The role of large language model and critical thinking in education
In the dynamic field of education, addressing the knowledge-skill gap remains a significant challenge, as students often excel in theoretical understanding but struggle with practical application. This study investigates the combined effects of the large language model (LLM) chatbot and critical thinking guidance on learners' acquisition of declarative knowledge (“know what”) and procedural knowledge (“know how”). Findings indicate that while the LLM chatbot enhances declarative knowledge acquisition, it does not significantly impact procedural learning, as learners tend to prioritize lower cognitive load and focus on declarative knowledge. In contrast, critical thinking guidance fosters procedural learning but increases cognitive load, thereby limiting resources available for declarative learning. However, when both interventions are combined, they generate synergistic effects—critical thinking guidance activates procedural learning, while the LLM chatbot mitigates cognitive burden, enabling a more balanced allocation of cognitive resources and improving both declarative and procedural knowledge acquisition. These findings highlight the potential of LLM chatbots as effective educational tools, suggesting that the strategic use of artificial intelligence can promote a more effective approach to knowledge acquisition. This research provides valuable insights into the application of advanced technologies in educational contexts, emphasizing the importance of appropriate instructional strategies to guide the effective use of these technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信