手术治疗单侧肾上腺偶发瘤和轻度自主皮质醇分泌(CHIRACIC)患者的高血压:一项多中心、开放标签、优势随机对照试验

IF 44 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Antoine Tabarin, Stéphanie Espiard, Timo Deutschbein, Laurence Amar, Delphine Vezzossi, Guido Di Dalmazi, Yves Reznik, Jacques Young, Rachel Desailloud, Bernard Goichot, Delphine Drui, Guillaume Assié, Hervé Lefebvre, Knut Mai, Frédéric Castinetti, Sandrine Laboureau, Massimo Terzolo, Amandine Ferriere, Aurore Georget, Eric Frison, Kathrin Zopf
{"title":"手术治疗单侧肾上腺偶发瘤和轻度自主皮质醇分泌(CHIRACIC)患者的高血压:一项多中心、开放标签、优势随机对照试验","authors":"Antoine Tabarin, Stéphanie Espiard, Timo Deutschbein, Laurence Amar, Delphine Vezzossi, Guido Di Dalmazi, Yves Reznik, Jacques Young, Rachel Desailloud, Bernard Goichot, Delphine Drui, Guillaume Assié, Hervé Lefebvre, Knut Mai, Frédéric Castinetti, Sandrine Laboureau, Massimo Terzolo, Amandine Ferriere, Aurore Georget, Eric Frison, Kathrin Zopf","doi":"10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00062-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Adrenal incidentalomas are found in 3–10% of adults undergoing abdominal imaging. Of these, 30–50% are responsible for mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), which is frequently associated with hypertension. The impact of adrenalectomy on hypertension in patients with unilateral incidentalomas and MACS remains uncertain. The aim of the CHIRACIC study was to prospectively assess the impact of surgical excision of the incidentaloma on blood pressure with a randomised trial combining accurate blood pressure measurement and standardisation of antihypertensive treatment.<h3>Methods</h3>CHIRACIC was a multicentre, superiority, open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial performed at 17 university hospitals in France, Italy, and Germany. Adults with hypertension with MACS entered a run-in phase to confirm hypertension with multiple home blood pressure measurements (HBPM) before blood pressure was normalised with standardised stepped-care antihypertensive treatment. Eligible participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to adrenalectomy or conservative management. Randomisation was blocked (random block size of 4 and 6) and stratified by intensity of antihypertensive treatment. Participants were followed up for 13 months and systematic attempts were made to gradually reduce antihypertensive treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of normotensive participants using HBPM who reduced their antihypertensive treatment in the intention-to-treat population at study completion. Key secondary endpoints included 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), mean change in antihypertensive treatment, and the proportion of participants with antihypertensive treatment at study completion. This study was registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT02364089</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and is completed.<h3>Findings</h3>Between April 9, 2015 and Nov 23, 2022, 78 patients were enrolled, and 52 eligible participants were randomly assigned to adrenalectomy (n=26, 23 underwent adrenalectomy and completed the study) or conservative management (n=26, 25 completed the study). The median age of participants was 63·3 years (IQR 57·4–68·2) and 36 (69%) were female. At study completion, a reduction in antihypertensive treatment with normal HBPM was observed in 12 (46%) of 26 participants treated with adrenalectomy and in four (15%) of 26 treated conservatively (adjusted risk difference [RD] 0·34 [95% CI 0·11 to 0·58]; p=0·0038). Similar results of smaller magnitude were observed for systolic blood pressure during 24 h ABPM. There were ten (43%) of 23 participants still needing antihypertensive treatment in the adrenalectomy group and 24 (96%) of 25 in the conservative management group (adjusted RD –0·58 [95% CI –0·78 to –0·38]; p&lt;0·0001). Mean antihypertensive treatment step was 0·8 (SD 1·1) in the adrenalectomy group and 3·0 (1·4) in the conservative management groups (adjusted difference –2·05 [95% CI –2·61 to –1·50]; p&lt;0·0001]. The number of patients with normal systolic HBPM and no hypertensive treatment was 12 (52%) of 23 in the adrenalectomy group and none in the conservative management group. Serious adverse events occurred in eight (35%) of 23 participants in the adrenalectomy group and eight (31%) of 26 participants in the conservative management group. Three serious adverse events for three (13%) participants were related to the surgery (post-surgical wall pain and hypotension).<h3>Interpretation</h3>MACS associated with unilateral adrenal incidentalomas is responsible for secondary hypertension that can be safely improved by minimally-invasive adrenalectomy.<h3>Funding</h3>French Ministry of Health and the German Research Foundation.","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":44.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgery for the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with unilateral adrenal incidentalomas and mild autonomous cortisol secretion (CHIRACIC): a multicentre, open-label, superiority randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Tabarin, Stéphanie Espiard, Timo Deutschbein, Laurence Amar, Delphine Vezzossi, Guido Di Dalmazi, Yves Reznik, Jacques Young, Rachel Desailloud, Bernard Goichot, Delphine Drui, Guillaume Assié, Hervé Lefebvre, Knut Mai, Frédéric Castinetti, Sandrine Laboureau, Massimo Terzolo, Amandine Ferriere, Aurore Georget, Eric Frison, Kathrin Zopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00062-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Adrenal incidentalomas are found in 3–10% of adults undergoing abdominal imaging. Of these, 30–50% are responsible for mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), which is frequently associated with hypertension. The impact of adrenalectomy on hypertension in patients with unilateral incidentalomas and MACS remains uncertain. The aim of the CHIRACIC study was to prospectively assess the impact of surgical excision of the incidentaloma on blood pressure with a randomised trial combining accurate blood pressure measurement and standardisation of antihypertensive treatment.<h3>Methods</h3>CHIRACIC was a multicentre, superiority, open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial performed at 17 university hospitals in France, Italy, and Germany. Adults with hypertension with MACS entered a run-in phase to confirm hypertension with multiple home blood pressure measurements (HBPM) before blood pressure was normalised with standardised stepped-care antihypertensive treatment. Eligible participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to adrenalectomy or conservative management. Randomisation was blocked (random block size of 4 and 6) and stratified by intensity of antihypertensive treatment. Participants were followed up for 13 months and systematic attempts were made to gradually reduce antihypertensive treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of normotensive participants using HBPM who reduced their antihypertensive treatment in the intention-to-treat population at study completion. Key secondary endpoints included 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), mean change in antihypertensive treatment, and the proportion of participants with antihypertensive treatment at study completion. This study was registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT02364089</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>, and is completed.<h3>Findings</h3>Between April 9, 2015 and Nov 23, 2022, 78 patients were enrolled, and 52 eligible participants were randomly assigned to adrenalectomy (n=26, 23 underwent adrenalectomy and completed the study) or conservative management (n=26, 25 completed the study). The median age of participants was 63·3 years (IQR 57·4–68·2) and 36 (69%) were female. At study completion, a reduction in antihypertensive treatment with normal HBPM was observed in 12 (46%) of 26 participants treated with adrenalectomy and in four (15%) of 26 treated conservatively (adjusted risk difference [RD] 0·34 [95% CI 0·11 to 0·58]; p=0·0038). Similar results of smaller magnitude were observed for systolic blood pressure during 24 h ABPM. There were ten (43%) of 23 participants still needing antihypertensive treatment in the adrenalectomy group and 24 (96%) of 25 in the conservative management group (adjusted RD –0·58 [95% CI –0·78 to –0·38]; p&lt;0·0001). Mean antihypertensive treatment step was 0·8 (SD 1·1) in the adrenalectomy group and 3·0 (1·4) in the conservative management groups (adjusted difference –2·05 [95% CI –2·61 to –1·50]; p&lt;0·0001]. The number of patients with normal systolic HBPM and no hypertensive treatment was 12 (52%) of 23 in the adrenalectomy group and none in the conservative management group. Serious adverse events occurred in eight (35%) of 23 participants in the adrenalectomy group and eight (31%) of 26 participants in the conservative management group. Three serious adverse events for three (13%) participants were related to the surgery (post-surgical wall pain and hypotension).<h3>Interpretation</h3>MACS associated with unilateral adrenal incidentalomas is responsible for secondary hypertension that can be safely improved by minimally-invasive adrenalectomy.<h3>Funding</h3>French Ministry of Health and the German Research Foundation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":44.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00062-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(25)00062-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在接受腹部影像学检查的成年人中,有3-10%的人发现肾偶发瘤。其中,30-50%负责轻度自主皮质醇分泌(MACS),这通常与高血压有关。肾上腺切除术对单侧偶发瘤和MACS患者高血压的影响仍不确定。CHIRACIC研究的目的是通过一项结合精确血压测量和标准化降压治疗的随机试验,前瞻性地评估手术切除偶发瘤对血压的影响。方法schiracic是一项多中心、优势、开放标签、平行、随机对照试验,在法国、意大利和德国的17所大学医院进行。成年高血压合并MACS患者进入磨合期,通过多次家庭血压测量(HBPM)确认高血压,然后通过标准化的分步降压治疗使血压恢复正常。然后将符合条件的参与者随机分配(1:1)到肾上腺切除术或保守治疗组。随机分组(随机分组大小为4和6)并按抗高血压治疗强度分层。随访13个月,系统尝试逐渐减少降压治疗。主要终点是在研究结束时意向治疗人群中使用HBPM降低降压治疗的血压正常参与者的比例。关键次要终点包括24小时动态血压测量(ABPM),抗高血压治疗的平均变化,以及研究结束时接受抗高血压治疗的参与者比例。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT02364089,并已完成。在2015年4月9日至2022年11月23日期间,78名患者入组,52名符合条件的参与者被随机分配到肾上腺切除术(n=26, 23人接受肾上腺切除术并完成研究)或保守治疗(n=26, 25人完成研究)。参与者的中位年龄为63.3岁(IQR为57.4 ~ 68.2),女性36人(69%)。在研究结束时,26名接受肾上腺切除术的参与者中有12名(46%)在HBPM正常的情况下降压治疗减少,26名接受保守治疗的参与者中有4名(15%)(校正风险差[RD] 0.34 [95% CI 0.11 ~ 0.58];p = 0·0038)。24h ABPM期间的收缩压也有类似的小幅度变化。肾上腺切除术组23名患者中有10名(43%)仍需降压治疗,保守治疗组25名患者中有24名(96%)仍需降压治疗(调整后RD为- 0.58 [95% CI为- 0.78 ~ - 0.38];术;0·0001)。肾上腺切除术组平均降压治疗步骤为0.8 (SD为1.1),保守治疗组平均降压治疗步骤为3.0 (SD为1.4)(校正差为-2·05 [95% CI -2·61 ~ -1·50];术;0·0001)。23例收缩期HBPM正常且未接受高血压治疗的患者中,肾上腺切除术组有12例(52%),保守治疗组无一例。肾上腺切除术组23名受试者中有8名(35%)发生严重不良事件,保守治疗组26名受试者中有8名(31%)发生严重不良事件。3名(13%)参与者出现了与手术相关的3个严重不良事件(术后壁痛和低血压)。macs与单侧肾上腺偶发瘤相关,可导致继发性高血压,可通过微创肾上腺切除术安全改善。资助:法国卫生部和德国研究基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgery for the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with unilateral adrenal incidentalomas and mild autonomous cortisol secretion (CHIRACIC): a multicentre, open-label, superiority randomised controlled trial

Background

Adrenal incidentalomas are found in 3–10% of adults undergoing abdominal imaging. Of these, 30–50% are responsible for mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), which is frequently associated with hypertension. The impact of adrenalectomy on hypertension in patients with unilateral incidentalomas and MACS remains uncertain. The aim of the CHIRACIC study was to prospectively assess the impact of surgical excision of the incidentaloma on blood pressure with a randomised trial combining accurate blood pressure measurement and standardisation of antihypertensive treatment.

Methods

CHIRACIC was a multicentre, superiority, open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial performed at 17 university hospitals in France, Italy, and Germany. Adults with hypertension with MACS entered a run-in phase to confirm hypertension with multiple home blood pressure measurements (HBPM) before blood pressure was normalised with standardised stepped-care antihypertensive treatment. Eligible participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to adrenalectomy or conservative management. Randomisation was blocked (random block size of 4 and 6) and stratified by intensity of antihypertensive treatment. Participants were followed up for 13 months and systematic attempts were made to gradually reduce antihypertensive treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of normotensive participants using HBPM who reduced their antihypertensive treatment in the intention-to-treat population at study completion. Key secondary endpoints included 24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), mean change in antihypertensive treatment, and the proportion of participants with antihypertensive treatment at study completion. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02364089, and is completed.

Findings

Between April 9, 2015 and Nov 23, 2022, 78 patients were enrolled, and 52 eligible participants were randomly assigned to adrenalectomy (n=26, 23 underwent adrenalectomy and completed the study) or conservative management (n=26, 25 completed the study). The median age of participants was 63·3 years (IQR 57·4–68·2) and 36 (69%) were female. At study completion, a reduction in antihypertensive treatment with normal HBPM was observed in 12 (46%) of 26 participants treated with adrenalectomy and in four (15%) of 26 treated conservatively (adjusted risk difference [RD] 0·34 [95% CI 0·11 to 0·58]; p=0·0038). Similar results of smaller magnitude were observed for systolic blood pressure during 24 h ABPM. There were ten (43%) of 23 participants still needing antihypertensive treatment in the adrenalectomy group and 24 (96%) of 25 in the conservative management group (adjusted RD –0·58 [95% CI –0·78 to –0·38]; p<0·0001). Mean antihypertensive treatment step was 0·8 (SD 1·1) in the adrenalectomy group and 3·0 (1·4) in the conservative management groups (adjusted difference –2·05 [95% CI –2·61 to –1·50]; p<0·0001]. The number of patients with normal systolic HBPM and no hypertensive treatment was 12 (52%) of 23 in the adrenalectomy group and none in the conservative management group. Serious adverse events occurred in eight (35%) of 23 participants in the adrenalectomy group and eight (31%) of 26 participants in the conservative management group. Three serious adverse events for three (13%) participants were related to the surgery (post-surgical wall pain and hypotension).

Interpretation

MACS associated with unilateral adrenal incidentalomas is responsible for secondary hypertension that can be safely improved by minimally-invasive adrenalectomy.

Funding

French Ministry of Health and the German Research Foundation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
61.50
自引率
1.60%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, an independent journal with a global perspective and strong clinical focus, features original clinical research, expert reviews, news, and opinion pieces in each monthly issue. Covering topics like diabetes, obesity, nutrition, and more, the journal provides insights into clinical advances and practice-changing research worldwide. It welcomes original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice, as well as informative reviews on related topics, especially those with global health importance and relevance to low-income and middle-income countries. The journal publishes various content types, including Articles, Reviews, Comments, Correspondence, Health Policy, and Personal Views, along with Series and Commissions aiming to drive positive change in clinical practice and health policy in diabetes and endocrinology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信