Kevan J. Minick, Jennifer Bahramian, David Love, Lauren Tucker, Keith Reinhardt, Daniel M. Johnson, Ryan E. Emanuel
{"title":"温带落叶林中两种树种内部水分运动和停留时间的差异:来自原位D2O同位素示踪研究的证据","authors":"Kevan J. Minick, Jennifer Bahramian, David Love, Lauren Tucker, Keith Reinhardt, Daniel M. Johnson, Ryan E. Emanuel","doi":"10.1002/eco.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To facilitate better predictive capabilities of hydrological fluxes in forested ecosystems, quantifying internal tree water movement at the tree species level is necessary. We measured short-term (daily) and long-term (weekly–monthly) water transport using isotopic breakthrough curves measured in real-time in tree species with different hydraulic anatomies (ring porous vs. tracheid). One gymnosperm species (loblolly pine; <i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) and one angiosperm species (southern red oak; <i>Quercus falcata</i>) were selected, which are common species across the Southeastern United States. Deuterated water (D<sub>2</sub>O) was injected into the base of four trees per species (eight trees total) and tracked radially (within xylem tissues) and axially (along tree trunks) for 45 days within tree trunks and leaf water. At three heights along the main trunk, boreholes were installed to isolate distinct xylem tissues: (1) shallow sapwood (SS W); (2) deep sapwood (DSW); and (3) heartwood (HW). Initially, both species showed tracer enrichment in SSW. Subsequent tracer movement showed that oaks retained more tracer in HW and for a longer period of time than pines. Arrival time of tracer peaks ranged from 1 to 13 days in oaks (maximum δ<sup>2</sup>H = −109 to +7291) and from 1 to 4 days in pines (maximum δ<sup>2</sup>H = +22 to +8831), while time to recovery to baseline δ<sup>2</sup>H concentrations generally ranged from 7 to 38 days in oaks and from 2 to 6 days in pines. Accordingly, tracer residence time tended to be longer for all tissue depths measured in the oak trunks (1–9 days) and leaves (9–18 days) compared with pines (trunk: 0.2–3 days; leaf: 5–8 days), while tracer travel velocity was higher in pines for the trunk in the SSW and HW (2.8–5.6 m day<sup>−1</sup>) compared with oaks (0.3–2.5 m day<sup>−1</sup>), but not when estimated at the leaf. Although sapwood and HW are hydraulically connected, the degree of connectivity varied between tree species. Results from this study open the door for more focused studies and a greater understanding of internal water movement within mature trees.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal Water Movement and Residence Time Differ in Two Tree Species in a Temperate Deciduous Forest: Evidence From an In Situ D2O Isotope Tracer Study\",\"authors\":\"Kevan J. Minick, Jennifer Bahramian, David Love, Lauren Tucker, Keith Reinhardt, Daniel M. Johnson, Ryan E. Emanuel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eco.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>To facilitate better predictive capabilities of hydrological fluxes in forested ecosystems, quantifying internal tree water movement at the tree species level is necessary. We measured short-term (daily) and long-term (weekly–monthly) water transport using isotopic breakthrough curves measured in real-time in tree species with different hydraulic anatomies (ring porous vs. tracheid). One gymnosperm species (loblolly pine; <i>Pinus taeda</i> L.) and one angiosperm species (southern red oak; <i>Quercus falcata</i>) were selected, which are common species across the Southeastern United States. Deuterated water (D<sub>2</sub>O) was injected into the base of four trees per species (eight trees total) and tracked radially (within xylem tissues) and axially (along tree trunks) for 45 days within tree trunks and leaf water. At three heights along the main trunk, boreholes were installed to isolate distinct xylem tissues: (1) shallow sapwood (SS W); (2) deep sapwood (DSW); and (3) heartwood (HW). Initially, both species showed tracer enrichment in SSW. Subsequent tracer movement showed that oaks retained more tracer in HW and for a longer period of time than pines. Arrival time of tracer peaks ranged from 1 to 13 days in oaks (maximum δ<sup>2</sup>H = −109 to +7291) and from 1 to 4 days in pines (maximum δ<sup>2</sup>H = +22 to +8831), while time to recovery to baseline δ<sup>2</sup>H concentrations generally ranged from 7 to 38 days in oaks and from 2 to 6 days in pines. Accordingly, tracer residence time tended to be longer for all tissue depths measured in the oak trunks (1–9 days) and leaves (9–18 days) compared with pines (trunk: 0.2–3 days; leaf: 5–8 days), while tracer travel velocity was higher in pines for the trunk in the SSW and HW (2.8–5.6 m day<sup>−1</sup>) compared with oaks (0.3–2.5 m day<sup>−1</sup>), but not when estimated at the leaf. Although sapwood and HW are hydraulically connected, the degree of connectivity varied between tree species. Results from this study open the door for more focused studies and a greater understanding of internal water movement within mature trees.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了提高对森林生态系统水文通量的预测能力,有必要在树种水平上对树木内部水分运动进行量化。我们利用同位素突破曲线实时测量了具有不同水力解剖结构(环孔型和管胞型)的树种的短期(每日)和长期(每周-每月)水分输送。一种裸子植物(火炬松;松(Pinus taeda L.)和一个被子植物种(南方红橡树;选取了美国东南部常见的一种栎(Quercus falcata)。将氘化水(D2O)注入每个树种4棵树的基部(共8棵树),并在树干和叶水中沿径向(木质部组织内)和轴向(沿树干)进行45天的跟踪。在沿主干的三个高度上,钻孔以分离不同的木质部组织:(1)浅边材(SS W);(2)深边材(DSW);(3)心材(HW)。最初,这两个物种都在SSW中显示了示踪剂富集。随后的示踪剂运动表明,与松树相比,橡树在HW中保留了更多的示踪剂,并且保留的时间更长。橡树的示踪峰到达时间为1 ~ 13天(最大δ2H =−109 ~ +7291),松树的示踪峰到达时间为1 ~ 4天(最大δ2H = +22 ~ +8831),而恢复到基线δ2H浓度的时间一般为7 ~ 38天,松树为2 ~ 6天。因此,在栎树树干(1 ~ 9 d)和树叶(9 ~ 18 d)中,示踪剂的停留时间比松树(树干:0.2 ~ 3 d;叶片:5-8天),而在SSW和HW中,松树的树干示踪剂传播速度(2.8-5.6 m day - 1)高于橡树(0.3-2.5 m day - 1),但在叶片上的估计则不是这样。虽然边材和HW是水力连接的,但不同树种之间的连通性程度不同。这项研究的结果为更有针对性的研究和更深入地了解成熟树木的内部水运动打开了大门。
Internal Water Movement and Residence Time Differ in Two Tree Species in a Temperate Deciduous Forest: Evidence From an In Situ D2O Isotope Tracer Study
To facilitate better predictive capabilities of hydrological fluxes in forested ecosystems, quantifying internal tree water movement at the tree species level is necessary. We measured short-term (daily) and long-term (weekly–monthly) water transport using isotopic breakthrough curves measured in real-time in tree species with different hydraulic anatomies (ring porous vs. tracheid). One gymnosperm species (loblolly pine; Pinus taeda L.) and one angiosperm species (southern red oak; Quercus falcata) were selected, which are common species across the Southeastern United States. Deuterated water (D2O) was injected into the base of four trees per species (eight trees total) and tracked radially (within xylem tissues) and axially (along tree trunks) for 45 days within tree trunks and leaf water. At three heights along the main trunk, boreholes were installed to isolate distinct xylem tissues: (1) shallow sapwood (SS W); (2) deep sapwood (DSW); and (3) heartwood (HW). Initially, both species showed tracer enrichment in SSW. Subsequent tracer movement showed that oaks retained more tracer in HW and for a longer period of time than pines. Arrival time of tracer peaks ranged from 1 to 13 days in oaks (maximum δ2H = −109 to +7291) and from 1 to 4 days in pines (maximum δ2H = +22 to +8831), while time to recovery to baseline δ2H concentrations generally ranged from 7 to 38 days in oaks and from 2 to 6 days in pines. Accordingly, tracer residence time tended to be longer for all tissue depths measured in the oak trunks (1–9 days) and leaves (9–18 days) compared with pines (trunk: 0.2–3 days; leaf: 5–8 days), while tracer travel velocity was higher in pines for the trunk in the SSW and HW (2.8–5.6 m day−1) compared with oaks (0.3–2.5 m day−1), but not when estimated at the leaf. Although sapwood and HW are hydraulically connected, the degree of connectivity varied between tree species. Results from this study open the door for more focused studies and a greater understanding of internal water movement within mature trees.
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management.
Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.