{"title":"风险评分模型预测胎儿生长受限妊娠不良围产期结局的外部验证","authors":"Jiratchaya Lekhalawan, Chitkasaem Suwanrath, Noppasin Khwankaew, Polathep Vichitkunakorn","doi":"10.1111/jog.16319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to validate the Prince of Songkla University (PSU) risk-scoring model for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with an antenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) in an independent cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective study was conducted on 121 non-anomalous singleton pregnancies affected by FGR between July 2022 and April 2024. The predictive performance of the PSU risk-scoring model, which combines maternal factors and simple ultrasound measurements to predict adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR, was evaluated by applying the original model to this independent cohort. Model variables included a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (1 point), chronic hypertension (3 points), HDP (2 points), maternal weight gain <8 kg (1 point), early-onset FGR (1 point), estimated fetal weight < 5th percentile (2 points), amniotic fluid index <5 cm (3 points), and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (2 points). Predictive performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at different cut-off values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median (interquartile range) gestational age at FGR diagnosis was 29 (22–39) weeks. Adverse perinatal outcomes occurred in 35 cases (28.9%). A cut-off score of 2 provided the highest sensitivity (85.7%) with a specificity of 51.2% for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes, with an AUC of 0.809 (95% confidence interval 0.714–0.905).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study confirms the predictive performance of the PSU risk-scoring model for adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR pregnancies, highlighting its potential to identify at-risk patients for referral, particularly in low-resource settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of a risk-scoring model for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction\",\"authors\":\"Jiratchaya Lekhalawan, Chitkasaem Suwanrath, Noppasin Khwankaew, Polathep Vichitkunakorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.16319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to validate the Prince of Songkla University (PSU) risk-scoring model for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with an antenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) in an independent cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective study was conducted on 121 non-anomalous singleton pregnancies affected by FGR between July 2022 and April 2024. The predictive performance of the PSU risk-scoring model, which combines maternal factors and simple ultrasound measurements to predict adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR, was evaluated by applying the original model to this independent cohort. Model variables included a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (1 point), chronic hypertension (3 points), HDP (2 points), maternal weight gain <8 kg (1 point), early-onset FGR (1 point), estimated fetal weight < 5th percentile (2 points), amniotic fluid index <5 cm (3 points), and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (2 points). Predictive performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at different cut-off values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Median (interquartile range) gestational age at FGR diagnosis was 29 (22–39) weeks. Adverse perinatal outcomes occurred in 35 cases (28.9%). A cut-off score of 2 provided the highest sensitivity (85.7%) with a specificity of 51.2% for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes, with an AUC of 0.809 (95% confidence interval 0.714–0.905).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study confirms the predictive performance of the PSU risk-scoring model for adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR pregnancies, highlighting its potential to identify at-risk patients for referral, particularly in low-resource settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16319\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
External validation of a risk-scoring model for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction
Aim
This study aimed to validate the Prince of Songkla University (PSU) risk-scoring model for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with an antenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) in an independent cohort.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted on 121 non-anomalous singleton pregnancies affected by FGR between July 2022 and April 2024. The predictive performance of the PSU risk-scoring model, which combines maternal factors and simple ultrasound measurements to predict adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR, was evaluated by applying the original model to this independent cohort. Model variables included a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (1 point), chronic hypertension (3 points), HDP (2 points), maternal weight gain <8 kg (1 point), early-onset FGR (1 point), estimated fetal weight < 5th percentile (2 points), amniotic fluid index <5 cm (3 points), and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (2 points). Predictive performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at different cut-off values.
Results
Median (interquartile range) gestational age at FGR diagnosis was 29 (22–39) weeks. Adverse perinatal outcomes occurred in 35 cases (28.9%). A cut-off score of 2 provided the highest sensitivity (85.7%) with a specificity of 51.2% for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes, with an AUC of 0.809 (95% confidence interval 0.714–0.905).
Conclusions
This study confirms the predictive performance of the PSU risk-scoring model for adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR pregnancies, highlighting its potential to identify at-risk patients for referral, particularly in low-resource settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.