“更好地做风险”:一种关系、透明和协作的方法

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Philip Messent, Percy Aggett
{"title":"“更好地做风险”:一种关系、透明和协作的方法","authors":"Philip Messent,&nbsp;Percy Aggett","doi":"10.1111/1467-6427.12492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this paper we consider and critique the way the concept of risk has come to shape practice in health and social care contexts in the UK, arguing that the approach places an undue emphasis on ‘technical’ methods of evaluating risk, allows for little inclusion of client perspectives, and how risk goes beyond the individual, and leaves individual clinicians burdened with a sense of carrying sole responsibility for ensuring clients' safety. We outline developments which draw upon more systemic and relational ideas regarding risk, drawing upon practices of transparency and collaboration, going on to describe a series of 5 service development initiatives making use of an appreciative inquiry approach to encourage teams to develop their practice in relation to risk, drawing upon these ideas and practices. While the evidence of the impact of these interventions is limited, we argue that it is sufficient to warrant further work in this area.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Therapy","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Doing Risk Better’: A Relational, Transparent and Collaborative Approach\",\"authors\":\"Philip Messent,&nbsp;Percy Aggett\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-6427.12492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In this paper we consider and critique the way the concept of risk has come to shape practice in health and social care contexts in the UK, arguing that the approach places an undue emphasis on ‘technical’ methods of evaluating risk, allows for little inclusion of client perspectives, and how risk goes beyond the individual, and leaves individual clinicians burdened with a sense of carrying sole responsibility for ensuring clients' safety. We outline developments which draw upon more systemic and relational ideas regarding risk, drawing upon practices of transparency and collaboration, going on to describe a series of 5 service development initiatives making use of an appreciative inquiry approach to encourage teams to develop their practice in relation to risk, drawing upon these ideas and practices. While the evidence of the impact of these interventions is limited, we argue that it is sufficient to warrant further work in this area.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Therapy\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6427.12492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6427.12492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们考虑并批评风险概念在英国健康和社会护理环境中形成实践的方式,认为该方法过分强调评估风险的“技术”方法,允许很少包含客户观点,以及风险如何超越个人,并使个人临床医生承担着确保客户安全的唯一责任。我们概述了关于风险的发展,借鉴了更多的系统性和相关性的想法,借鉴了透明度和协作的实践,接着描述了一系列5个服务开发计划,利用欣赏式询问方法鼓励团队发展与风险相关的实践,借鉴了这些想法和实践。虽然这些干预措施影响的证据有限,但我们认为这足以保证在这一领域进一步开展工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Doing Risk Better’: A Relational, Transparent and Collaborative Approach

In this paper we consider and critique the way the concept of risk has come to shape practice in health and social care contexts in the UK, arguing that the approach places an undue emphasis on ‘technical’ methods of evaluating risk, allows for little inclusion of client perspectives, and how risk goes beyond the individual, and leaves individual clinicians burdened with a sense of carrying sole responsibility for ensuring clients' safety. We outline developments which draw upon more systemic and relational ideas regarding risk, drawing upon practices of transparency and collaboration, going on to describe a series of 5 service development initiatives making use of an appreciative inquiry approach to encourage teams to develop their practice in relation to risk, drawing upon these ideas and practices. While the evidence of the impact of these interventions is limited, we argue that it is sufficient to warrant further work in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Therapy advances the understanding and treatment of human relationships constituted in systems such as couples, families and professional networks and wider groups, by publishing articles on theory, research, clinical practice and training. The editorial board includes leading academics and professionals from around the world in keeping with the high standard of international contributions, which make it one of the most widely read family therapy journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信