河岸植物对植被河流洪涝灾害影响的评价

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Matteo Rillo Migliorini Giovannini, Giuseppe Francesco Cesare Lama, Lorenzo Scopetani, Simona Francalanci, Andrea Signorile, Rossana Saracino, Federico Preti
{"title":"河岸植物对植被河流洪涝灾害影响的评价","authors":"Matteo Rillo Migliorini Giovannini,&nbsp;Giuseppe Francesco Cesare Lama,&nbsp;Lorenzo Scopetani,&nbsp;Simona Francalanci,&nbsp;Andrea Signorile,&nbsp;Rossana Saracino,&nbsp;Federico Preti","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the last few years, vegetated rivers have been managed with the main purpose of achieving water drainage and improving conveyance through vegetation removal. However, this leads to peak discharge augmentation and wave travel time reduction. This study assesses vegetation shredding and selective cut impacts on flood risk management. Flow resistance was obtained considering vegetation morphology and hydrodynamic measurements performed during two field campaigns conducted just before the destructive cut and in the growing season after 4 years. Järvelä model was adopted by modeling shrubby vegetation Leaf Area Index (<i>LAI</i>), while Nepf model was selected for herbaceous vegetation, based on flexible plants reconfiguration, strongly dependent on vegetation species and type. Finally, Baptist et al. model was employed for woody rigid plants, modeled as a random or staggered array of rigid cylinders. Results of one-dimensional unsteady hydraulic numerical simulations show higher water levels 4 years after the severe cut, while selective thinning reduces them. This methodology allows the quantification of flood propagation and peak flow delay: wave celerity decreases up to 21% and up to 34% (for undisturbed vegetation and clear cut scenarios, respectively) because of vegetation re-growth, causing a flood delay from 20 to 30 min at the downstream cross-section.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Impacts of Riparian Plants on Flood Hazard Within Vegetated Rivers\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Rillo Migliorini Giovannini,&nbsp;Giuseppe Francesco Cesare Lama,&nbsp;Lorenzo Scopetani,&nbsp;Simona Francalanci,&nbsp;Andrea Signorile,&nbsp;Rossana Saracino,&nbsp;Federico Preti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the last few years, vegetated rivers have been managed with the main purpose of achieving water drainage and improving conveyance through vegetation removal. However, this leads to peak discharge augmentation and wave travel time reduction. This study assesses vegetation shredding and selective cut impacts on flood risk management. Flow resistance was obtained considering vegetation morphology and hydrodynamic measurements performed during two field campaigns conducted just before the destructive cut and in the growing season after 4 years. Järvelä model was adopted by modeling shrubby vegetation Leaf Area Index (<i>LAI</i>), while Nepf model was selected for herbaceous vegetation, based on flexible plants reconfiguration, strongly dependent on vegetation species and type. Finally, Baptist et al. model was employed for woody rigid plants, modeled as a random or staggered array of rigid cylinders. Results of one-dimensional unsteady hydraulic numerical simulations show higher water levels 4 years after the severe cut, while selective thinning reduces them. This methodology allows the quantification of flood propagation and peak flow delay: wave celerity decreases up to 21% and up to 34% (for undisturbed vegetation and clear cut scenarios, respectively) because of vegetation re-growth, causing a flood delay from 20 to 30 min at the downstream cross-section.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70063\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70063\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几年里,对有植被的河流进行了管理,主要目的是通过清除植被来实现排水和改善运输。然而,这会导致峰值放电增大和波行时间减少。本研究评估了植被切碎和选择性砍伐对洪水风险管理的影响。在破坏性砍伐前和4年后生长季节进行的两次野外活动中,考虑了植被形态和水动力测量,获得了流动阻力。灌木林植被叶面积指数(LAI)建模采用Järvelä模型,草本植被采用Nepf模型,基于植物灵活重构,对植被种类和类型依赖性强。最后,浸礼会等人的模型用于木质刚性植物,建模为随机或交错排列的刚性圆柱体。一维非定常水力数值模拟结果表明,严重切割后4年水位升高,而选择性减薄则使水位降低。这种方法可以量化洪水传播和峰值流延迟:由于植被的重新生长,波速下降高达21%和34%(分别针对未受干扰的植被和未砍伐的情况),导致下游横截面的洪水延迟从20到30分钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the Impacts of Riparian Plants on Flood Hazard Within Vegetated Rivers

Evaluating the Impacts of Riparian Plants on Flood Hazard Within Vegetated Rivers

In the last few years, vegetated rivers have been managed with the main purpose of achieving water drainage and improving conveyance through vegetation removal. However, this leads to peak discharge augmentation and wave travel time reduction. This study assesses vegetation shredding and selective cut impacts on flood risk management. Flow resistance was obtained considering vegetation morphology and hydrodynamic measurements performed during two field campaigns conducted just before the destructive cut and in the growing season after 4 years. Järvelä model was adopted by modeling shrubby vegetation Leaf Area Index (LAI), while Nepf model was selected for herbaceous vegetation, based on flexible plants reconfiguration, strongly dependent on vegetation species and type. Finally, Baptist et al. model was employed for woody rigid plants, modeled as a random or staggered array of rigid cylinders. Results of one-dimensional unsteady hydraulic numerical simulations show higher water levels 4 years after the severe cut, while selective thinning reduces them. This methodology allows the quantification of flood propagation and peak flow delay: wave celerity decreases up to 21% and up to 34% (for undisturbed vegetation and clear cut scenarios, respectively) because of vegetation re-growth, causing a flood delay from 20 to 30 min at the downstream cross-section.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信