气象和植被结构对美国森林和灌丛地流通量的控制

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Edward Ayres
{"title":"气象和植被结构对美国森林和灌丛地流通量的控制","authors":"Edward Ayres","doi":"10.1029/2024JG008519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Throughfall is the dominant input of water to most terrestrial ecosystems and is primarily driven by precipitation quantity, although the relationship varies among sites. A wide range of meteorological and site-based properties also influence throughfall and may explain this variability, but their importance for accurately predicting throughfall quantities across differing sites remains unknown. Here I develop models to predict daily throughfall quantities at ∼1 m<sup>2</sup> resolution based on up to 19 environmental parameters using multi-year data from sites throughout the US. Three random forest models of varying complexity were trained to predict throughfall: a simple model (RF-1) driven solely by precipitation quantity, and more complex models that incorporated an additional eight (RF-9) and eighteen (RF-19) variables. RF-1 was able to predict throughfall quantities (±28%) and accuracy was modestly improved by including additional model parameters (±24–26%). Improvements in model performance were most apparent for smaller precipitation events (&lt;10 mm), which are less likely to fully saturate the canopy (22% improvement in prediction accuracy for the RF-19 model). Precipitation quantity, maximum intensity, and duration were consistently identified as the most important drivers of throughfall, whereas variables relating to evaporative potential and canopy water storage capacity were identified as moderately important. These models allow the impacts of environmental changes (e.g., forest regrowth after clearcutting or increased precipitation intensity) to be evaluated, as well as inform decisions about which parameters to include in field- and model-based studies of throughfall and its converse, interception, when resources are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"130 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JG008519","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meteorological and Vegetation Structure Controls on Liquid Throughfall in US Forests and Shrublands\",\"authors\":\"Edward Ayres\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JG008519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Throughfall is the dominant input of water to most terrestrial ecosystems and is primarily driven by precipitation quantity, although the relationship varies among sites. A wide range of meteorological and site-based properties also influence throughfall and may explain this variability, but their importance for accurately predicting throughfall quantities across differing sites remains unknown. Here I develop models to predict daily throughfall quantities at ∼1 m<sup>2</sup> resolution based on up to 19 environmental parameters using multi-year data from sites throughout the US. Three random forest models of varying complexity were trained to predict throughfall: a simple model (RF-1) driven solely by precipitation quantity, and more complex models that incorporated an additional eight (RF-9) and eighteen (RF-19) variables. RF-1 was able to predict throughfall quantities (±28%) and accuracy was modestly improved by including additional model parameters (±24–26%). Improvements in model performance were most apparent for smaller precipitation events (&lt;10 mm), which are less likely to fully saturate the canopy (22% improvement in prediction accuracy for the RF-19 model). Precipitation quantity, maximum intensity, and duration were consistently identified as the most important drivers of throughfall, whereas variables relating to evaporative potential and canopy water storage capacity were identified as moderately important. These models allow the impacts of environmental changes (e.g., forest regrowth after clearcutting or increased precipitation intensity) to be evaluated, as well as inform decisions about which parameters to include in field- and model-based studies of throughfall and its converse, interception, when resources are limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences\",\"volume\":\"130 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JG008519\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008519\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过降雨是大多数陆地生态系统的主要水输入,主要受降水量驱动,尽管不同地点之间的关系有所不同。广泛的气象和基于地点的特性也会影响穿透,并可能解释这种变化,但它们对于准确预测不同地点的穿透量的重要性尚不清楚。在这里,我开发了基于19个环境参数的模型,利用来自美国各地的多年数据,以1平方米的分辨率预测日穿透量。研究人员训练了三个不同复杂性的随机森林模型来预测降雨量:一个简单模型(RF-1)仅由降水量驱动,另一个更复杂的模型包含了额外的8个(RF-9)和18个(RF-19)变量。RF-1能够预测穿透量(±28%),通过加入额外的模型参数(±24-26%),准确性得到适度提高。对于较小的降水事件(10毫米),模型性能的改进最为明显,这些降水事件不太可能使冠层完全饱和(RF-19模型的预测精度提高了22%)。降水量、最大强度和持续时间被一致认为是穿透雨最重要的驱动因素,而与蒸发势和冠层蓄水能力相关的变量被认为是中等重要的。这些模式可以评估环境变化的影响(例如,砍伐森林后的森林再生或降水强度增加),并为在资源有限的情况下将哪些参数纳入基于实地和模式的through - fall及其相反的截流研究提供决策依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Meteorological and Vegetation Structure Controls on Liquid Throughfall in US Forests and Shrublands

Meteorological and Vegetation Structure Controls on Liquid Throughfall in US Forests and Shrublands

Throughfall is the dominant input of water to most terrestrial ecosystems and is primarily driven by precipitation quantity, although the relationship varies among sites. A wide range of meteorological and site-based properties also influence throughfall and may explain this variability, but their importance for accurately predicting throughfall quantities across differing sites remains unknown. Here I develop models to predict daily throughfall quantities at ∼1 m2 resolution based on up to 19 environmental parameters using multi-year data from sites throughout the US. Three random forest models of varying complexity were trained to predict throughfall: a simple model (RF-1) driven solely by precipitation quantity, and more complex models that incorporated an additional eight (RF-9) and eighteen (RF-19) variables. RF-1 was able to predict throughfall quantities (±28%) and accuracy was modestly improved by including additional model parameters (±24–26%). Improvements in model performance were most apparent for smaller precipitation events (<10 mm), which are less likely to fully saturate the canopy (22% improvement in prediction accuracy for the RF-19 model). Precipitation quantity, maximum intensity, and duration were consistently identified as the most important drivers of throughfall, whereas variables relating to evaporative potential and canopy water storage capacity were identified as moderately important. These models allow the impacts of environmental changes (e.g., forest regrowth after clearcutting or increased precipitation intensity) to be evaluated, as well as inform decisions about which parameters to include in field- and model-based studies of throughfall and its converse, interception, when resources are limited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信