{"title":"倾听女性的声音:英国女性生殖器切割(FGM)患者和公众参与的外阴重建手术探索","authors":"Juliet Albert, Janet Fyle, Njomeza Kartallozi, Christie Coho, Naana Otoo-Oyortey, Hekate Papadaki, Catrin Evans, Dalia Saidan, Sohier Elneil, Natasha Anderson-Foster, Jasmine Abdulcadir, Huda Mohamed, Aurora Almadori","doi":"10.1111/hex.70275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This article presents patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work undertaken to explore FGM survivors' and stakeholders' views on reconstructive surgery, potential service models, care pathways, barriers to access and other support needs. The aim was to set research priorities, identify key themes and help inform subsequent research in the field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A national research collective was established comprising over 20 stakeholders, including FGM survivors/women with lived experience, healthcare professionals, academics and advocacy groups. The group undertook two discussion workshops with FGM survivors (<i>n</i> = 11 participants), two national stakeholder events (<i>n</i> = 142 attendees) and significant advocacy and partnership-building activities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Key insights were that FGM survivors would value reconstructive surgery to address body image concerns, genital pain and sexual difficulties. Potential barriers to surgery included stigma, safeguarding concerns, lack of awareness and fear. Significant gaps were identified around women's knowledge of clitoral anatomy, FGM types and specialist services. Survivors and stakeholders emphasised the need to complement surgical reconstruction with a comprehensive care pathway including trauma counselling and psychosexual therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the importance of a survivor-led approach to FGM service development, as often the voices of FGM survivors are not included. The exercise demonstrated that, with the right approach, it is possible to engage ‘minoritised communities/individuals from the global majority’ and communities dispayed considerable willingness to participate in this sensitive research field. It also emphasises an urgent need for accessible, high-quality FGM care informed by the voices of those affected, to improve outcomes and support for FGM survivors in the United Kingdom.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Women with lived experience of FGM and women from FGM-affected communities, as well as other national stakeholders (including Non Government Organisation's and charities working with FGM survivors, academics, artists and campaigners were involved in the design and conduct of this study, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70275","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Listening to Women's Voices: A Patient and Public Involvement Exercise Exploring Vulval Reconstructive Surgery for UK Women With Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)\",\"authors\":\"Juliet Albert, Janet Fyle, Njomeza Kartallozi, Christie Coho, Naana Otoo-Oyortey, Hekate Papadaki, Catrin Evans, Dalia Saidan, Sohier Elneil, Natasha Anderson-Foster, Jasmine Abdulcadir, Huda Mohamed, Aurora Almadori\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This article presents patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work undertaken to explore FGM survivors' and stakeholders' views on reconstructive surgery, potential service models, care pathways, barriers to access and other support needs. The aim was to set research priorities, identify key themes and help inform subsequent research in the field.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A national research collective was established comprising over 20 stakeholders, including FGM survivors/women with lived experience, healthcare professionals, academics and advocacy groups. The group undertook two discussion workshops with FGM survivors (<i>n</i> = 11 participants), two national stakeholder events (<i>n</i> = 142 attendees) and significant advocacy and partnership-building activities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Key insights were that FGM survivors would value reconstructive surgery to address body image concerns, genital pain and sexual difficulties. Potential barriers to surgery included stigma, safeguarding concerns, lack of awareness and fear. Significant gaps were identified around women's knowledge of clitoral anatomy, FGM types and specialist services. Survivors and stakeholders emphasised the need to complement surgical reconstruction with a comprehensive care pathway including trauma counselling and psychosexual therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study highlights the importance of a survivor-led approach to FGM service development, as often the voices of FGM survivors are not included. The exercise demonstrated that, with the right approach, it is possible to engage ‘minoritised communities/individuals from the global majority’ and communities dispayed considerable willingness to participate in this sensitive research field. It also emphasises an urgent need for accessible, high-quality FGM care informed by the voices of those affected, to improve outcomes and support for FGM survivors in the United Kingdom.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>Women with lived experience of FGM and women from FGM-affected communities, as well as other national stakeholders (including Non Government Organisation's and charities working with FGM survivors, academics, artists and campaigners were involved in the design and conduct of this study, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70275\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70275\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Listening to Women's Voices: A Patient and Public Involvement Exercise Exploring Vulval Reconstructive Surgery for UK Women With Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)
Introduction
This article presents patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work undertaken to explore FGM survivors' and stakeholders' views on reconstructive surgery, potential service models, care pathways, barriers to access and other support needs. The aim was to set research priorities, identify key themes and help inform subsequent research in the field.
Methods
A national research collective was established comprising over 20 stakeholders, including FGM survivors/women with lived experience, healthcare professionals, academics and advocacy groups. The group undertook two discussion workshops with FGM survivors (n = 11 participants), two national stakeholder events (n = 142 attendees) and significant advocacy and partnership-building activities.
Results
Key insights were that FGM survivors would value reconstructive surgery to address body image concerns, genital pain and sexual difficulties. Potential barriers to surgery included stigma, safeguarding concerns, lack of awareness and fear. Significant gaps were identified around women's knowledge of clitoral anatomy, FGM types and specialist services. Survivors and stakeholders emphasised the need to complement surgical reconstruction with a comprehensive care pathway including trauma counselling and psychosexual therapy.
Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of a survivor-led approach to FGM service development, as often the voices of FGM survivors are not included. The exercise demonstrated that, with the right approach, it is possible to engage ‘minoritised communities/individuals from the global majority’ and communities dispayed considerable willingness to participate in this sensitive research field. It also emphasises an urgent need for accessible, high-quality FGM care informed by the voices of those affected, to improve outcomes and support for FGM survivors in the United Kingdom.
Patient or Public Contribution
Women with lived experience of FGM and women from FGM-affected communities, as well as other national stakeholders (including Non Government Organisation's and charities working with FGM survivors, academics, artists and campaigners were involved in the design and conduct of this study, analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.