中国健康与退休纵向研究的统一认知评估方案中的语言、识字、感觉障碍和缺失认知测试分数

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Alden L. Gross, Ying Liu, Yuan S. Zhang, Yaohui Zhao, Chihua Li, Erik Meijer, Jinkook Lee, Lindsay C. Kobayashi
{"title":"中国健康与退休纵向研究的统一认知评估方案中的语言、识字、感觉障碍和缺失认知测试分数","authors":"Alden L. Gross,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Yuan S. Zhang,&nbsp;Yaohui Zhao,&nbsp;Chihua Li,&nbsp;Erik Meijer,&nbsp;Jinkook Lee,&nbsp;Lindsay C. Kobayashi","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The potentially biasing impacts of low language fluency, illiteracy, and sensory impairments on cognitive test performance are unknown, which may have implications for understanding their roles in cognitive decline and dementia.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>We investigated effects of these features on cognitive test item completion and performance among older adults in China, a multilingual country with high prevalence of illiteracy and sensory impairment.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used cognitive test data from the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted in 2018 (N = 9755, age 60 + years). We first tested associations of fluency in spoken Mandarin, literacy, and sensory impairment (hearing and vision) with missingness of cognitive items. We then tested for differential item functioning (DIF) in observed cognitive items by these features.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed high levels of missing data in most cognitive test items – on average 13% and as high as 65%. Low fluency in spoken Mandarin, illiteracy, and impairments in hearing and vision were each associated with greater odds of missingness on nearly all tests. Partly because of differential missingness, there was minimal evidence of DIF by these features in items in which we expected a priori to find DIF (e.g., repetition of a spoken phrase among those with hearing impairment). Several cognitive test items exhibited statistically significant DIF, however there was minimal evidence of meaningful DIF.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Differential missingness in cognitive items by spoken language, literacy, and sensory impairments is potentially more of an inferential threat than measurement differences in test items.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language, literacy, and sensory impairments and missing cognitive test scores in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study\",\"authors\":\"Alden L. Gross,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Yuan S. Zhang,&nbsp;Yaohui Zhao,&nbsp;Chihua Li,&nbsp;Erik Meijer,&nbsp;Jinkook Lee,&nbsp;Lindsay C. Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The potentially biasing impacts of low language fluency, illiteracy, and sensory impairments on cognitive test performance are unknown, which may have implications for understanding their roles in cognitive decline and dementia.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>We investigated effects of these features on cognitive test item completion and performance among older adults in China, a multilingual country with high prevalence of illiteracy and sensory impairment.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used cognitive test data from the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted in 2018 (N = 9755, age 60 + years). We first tested associations of fluency in spoken Mandarin, literacy, and sensory impairment (hearing and vision) with missingness of cognitive items. We then tested for differential item functioning (DIF) in observed cognitive items by these features.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed high levels of missing data in most cognitive test items – on average 13% and as high as 65%. Low fluency in spoken Mandarin, illiteracy, and impairments in hearing and vision were each associated with greater odds of missingness on nearly all tests. Partly because of differential missingness, there was minimal evidence of DIF by these features in items in which we expected a priori to find DIF (e.g., repetition of a spoken phrase among those with hearing impairment). Several cognitive test items exhibited statistically significant DIF, however there was minimal evidence of meaningful DIF.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Differential missingness in cognitive items by spoken language, literacy, and sensory impairments is potentially more of an inferential threat than measurement differences in test items.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低语言流畅性、文盲和感觉障碍对认知测试表现的潜在偏倚影响尚不清楚,这可能对理解它们在认知能力下降和痴呆中的作用有影响。目的:我们研究这些特征对中国老年人认知测试项目完成和表现的影响,中国是一个多语言国家,文盲和感觉障碍普遍存在。方法采用2018年中国健康与退休纵向研究统一认知评估方案中的认知测试数据(N = 9755,年龄60岁以上)。我们首先测试了普通话口语流利程度、读写能力和感觉障碍(听力和视力)与认知项目缺失的关系。然后,我们通过这些特征测试了观察到的认知项目的差异项目功能(DIF)。结果在大多数认知测试项目中,我们观察到高水平的数据缺失——平均为13%,最高为65%。普通话口语不流利、文盲、听力和视力受损,都与几乎所有测试中缺失的几率较大有关。部分由于差异缺失,在我们先验地期望发现DIF的项目中,这些特征的DIF证据很少(例如,听力障碍患者重复口语短语)。几个认知测试项目表现出统计学上显著的DIF,但有意义的DIF的证据很少。结论口语、读写和感觉障碍导致的认知项目差异缺失可能比测试项目的测量差异更具有推断性威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Language, literacy, and sensory impairments and missing cognitive test scores in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

Background

The potentially biasing impacts of low language fluency, illiteracy, and sensory impairments on cognitive test performance are unknown, which may have implications for understanding their roles in cognitive decline and dementia.

Aims

We investigated effects of these features on cognitive test item completion and performance among older adults in China, a multilingual country with high prevalence of illiteracy and sensory impairment.

Methods

We used cognitive test data from the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted in 2018 (N = 9755, age 60 + years). We first tested associations of fluency in spoken Mandarin, literacy, and sensory impairment (hearing and vision) with missingness of cognitive items. We then tested for differential item functioning (DIF) in observed cognitive items by these features.

Results

We observed high levels of missing data in most cognitive test items – on average 13% and as high as 65%. Low fluency in spoken Mandarin, illiteracy, and impairments in hearing and vision were each associated with greater odds of missingness on nearly all tests. Partly because of differential missingness, there was minimal evidence of DIF by these features in items in which we expected a priori to find DIF (e.g., repetition of a spoken phrase among those with hearing impairment). Several cognitive test items exhibited statistically significant DIF, however there was minimal evidence of meaningful DIF.

Conclusions

Differential missingness in cognitive items by spoken language, literacy, and sensory impairments is potentially more of an inferential threat than measurement differences in test items.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信