对意大利老年人综合老年评估准则执行情况的思考

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Alberto Castagna, Giovanni Ruotolo, Margherita Azzini, Pierangelo Lora Aprile, Nicola Vanacore, Alberto Pilotto, Nicola Veronese
{"title":"对意大利老年人综合老年评估准则执行情况的思考","authors":"Alberto Castagna,&nbsp;Giovanni Ruotolo,&nbsp;Margherita Azzini,&nbsp;Pierangelo Lora Aprile,&nbsp;Nicola Vanacore,&nbsp;Alberto Pilotto,&nbsp;Nicola Veronese","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03036-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A fundamental phase in the life of new Guidelines is the implementation, which responds to the need to facilitate their adoption with interventions and procedures of proven effectiveness to increase their impact on public health. The implementation should follow a scientific method, and therefore shares many characteristics and the rigorous approach of clinical research. However, it differs in purposes, methods, and aims by addressing factors that include identifying and resolving barriers and facilitators in the adoption of evidence-based clinical innovations. The use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can be facilitated by technological tools, with the possibility of early diagnosis of several chronic conditions, monitoring and management of the diseases typical of older people and, finally, to personalized care and optimization of healthcare resources. However, remote CGA also has limitations, including technology requirements, data security/privacy, and the need for comprehensive evaluation and simplicity. In this document we present the history and the model of implementation of the Italian guidelines on CGA in older persons. The standardization of CGA in older adults across different settings is particularly important in countries like Italy, that have among the oldest world population and where broader implementation of CGA, also outside traditional geriatric settings, has become a health priority that cannot longer be delayed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03036-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on the implementation of the Italian guidelines on comprehensive geriatric assesment for the older persons\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Castagna,&nbsp;Giovanni Ruotolo,&nbsp;Margherita Azzini,&nbsp;Pierangelo Lora Aprile,&nbsp;Nicola Vanacore,&nbsp;Alberto Pilotto,&nbsp;Nicola Veronese\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-03036-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A fundamental phase in the life of new Guidelines is the implementation, which responds to the need to facilitate their adoption with interventions and procedures of proven effectiveness to increase their impact on public health. The implementation should follow a scientific method, and therefore shares many characteristics and the rigorous approach of clinical research. However, it differs in purposes, methods, and aims by addressing factors that include identifying and resolving barriers and facilitators in the adoption of evidence-based clinical innovations. The use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can be facilitated by technological tools, with the possibility of early diagnosis of several chronic conditions, monitoring and management of the diseases typical of older people and, finally, to personalized care and optimization of healthcare resources. However, remote CGA also has limitations, including technology requirements, data security/privacy, and the need for comprehensive evaluation and simplicity. In this document we present the history and the model of implementation of the Italian guidelines on CGA in older persons. The standardization of CGA in older adults across different settings is particularly important in countries like Italy, that have among the oldest world population and where broader implementation of CGA, also outside traditional geriatric settings, has become a health priority that cannot longer be delayed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03036-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03036-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03036-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新《准则》生命周期的一个基本阶段是实施阶段,这一阶段需要通过证明有效的干预措施和程序来促进其通过,以增加其对公共卫生的影响。实施应遵循科学的方法,因此具有临床研究的许多特点和严谨的方法。然而,它在目的、方法和目标上有所不同,涉及的因素包括识别和解决采用循证临床创新的障碍和促进因素。技术工具可以促进综合老年评估(CGA)的使用,有可能对几种慢性疾病进行早期诊断,监测和管理老年人的典型疾病,并最终实现个性化护理和优化医疗保健资源。然而,远程CGA也有局限性,包括技术要求、数据安全/隐私、需要全面评估和简单性。在本文件中,我们介绍了意大利老年人CGA指南的实施历史和模式。在意大利等国家,不同环境下老年人CGA的标准化尤为重要,这些国家拥有世界上最年长的人口,而且在传统老年环境之外更广泛地实施CGA已成为一项不能再拖延的卫生优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections on the implementation of the Italian guidelines on comprehensive geriatric assesment for the older persons

A fundamental phase in the life of new Guidelines is the implementation, which responds to the need to facilitate their adoption with interventions and procedures of proven effectiveness to increase their impact on public health. The implementation should follow a scientific method, and therefore shares many characteristics and the rigorous approach of clinical research. However, it differs in purposes, methods, and aims by addressing factors that include identifying and resolving barriers and facilitators in the adoption of evidence-based clinical innovations. The use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can be facilitated by technological tools, with the possibility of early diagnosis of several chronic conditions, monitoring and management of the diseases typical of older people and, finally, to personalized care and optimization of healthcare resources. However, remote CGA also has limitations, including technology requirements, data security/privacy, and the need for comprehensive evaluation and simplicity. In this document we present the history and the model of implementation of the Italian guidelines on CGA in older persons. The standardization of CGA in older adults across different settings is particularly important in countries like Italy, that have among the oldest world population and where broader implementation of CGA, also outside traditional geriatric settings, has become a health priority that cannot longer be delayed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信