基于混合模糊AHP-TOPSIS模型的绿色建筑材料选择决策

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Weiran Cheng, Manting Hu, Chaonan Wu
{"title":"基于混合模糊AHP-TOPSIS模型的绿色建筑材料选择决策","authors":"Weiran Cheng,&nbsp;Manting Hu,&nbsp;Chaonan Wu","doi":"10.1007/s13201-025-02481-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable material selection is essential for minimizing environmental impact, resource depletion, and energy consumption in construction. We propose a hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model to evaluate and rank four material alternatives based on nine sustainability criteria across three environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Fuzzy AHP determines criteria weights based on expert judgments, while TOPSIS ranks materials based on their relative closeness to the ideal sustainable solution. The results indicate that fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (GPC) ranked first (<i>C</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.885) due to its low carbon footprint and high recyclability, followed by cross-laminated timber (CLT) (<i>C</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.873), autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) (<i>C</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.832), and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) (<i>C</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.791). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the rankings, demonstrating the model’s adaptability to different sustainability priorities. However, expert judgment introduces subjectivity, and integrating real-time sustainability data, such as material lifecycle emissions and resource availability updates, could enhance decision-making accuracy. This hybrid model offers a structured, transparent, and adaptable decision-making framework, ensuring transparency in the weighting process, material ranking, and overall selection methodology, thereby contributing to data-driven sustainable material selection for green building applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02481-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing green building decision-making with a hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model for material selection\",\"authors\":\"Weiran Cheng,&nbsp;Manting Hu,&nbsp;Chaonan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13201-025-02481-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainable material selection is essential for minimizing environmental impact, resource depletion, and energy consumption in construction. We propose a hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model to evaluate and rank four material alternatives based on nine sustainability criteria across three environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Fuzzy AHP determines criteria weights based on expert judgments, while TOPSIS ranks materials based on their relative closeness to the ideal sustainable solution. The results indicate that fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (GPC) ranked first (<i>C</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.885) due to its low carbon footprint and high recyclability, followed by cross-laminated timber (CLT) (<i>C</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.873), autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) (<i>C</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.832), and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) (<i>C</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.791). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the rankings, demonstrating the model’s adaptability to different sustainability priorities. However, expert judgment introduces subjectivity, and integrating real-time sustainability data, such as material lifecycle emissions and resource availability updates, could enhance decision-making accuracy. This hybrid model offers a structured, transparent, and adaptable decision-making framework, ensuring transparency in the weighting process, material ranking, and overall selection methodology, thereby contributing to data-driven sustainable material selection for green building applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-025-02481-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Water Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02481-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-025-02481-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续的材料选择对于最小化环境影响、资源消耗和建筑中的能源消耗至关重要。我们提出了一种混合模糊AHP-TOPSIS模型,根据环境、经济和社会三个维度的九项可持续性标准对四种材料替代品进行评估和排名。模糊层次分析法根据专家判断确定标准权重,而TOPSIS根据材料与理想可持续解决方案的相对接近程度对材料进行排名。结果表明,粉煤灰基地聚合物混凝土(GPC)因其碳足迹低、可回收性高而排名第一(Ci = 0.885),其次是交叉层合木(CLT) (Ci = 0.873)、蒸压加气混凝土(AAC) (Ci = 0.832)和再生混凝土骨料(RCA) (Ci = 0.791)。敏感性分析证实了排名的稳健性,证明了模型对不同可持续性优先事项的适应性。然而,专家判断引入了主观性,整合实时可持续性数据,如材料生命周期排放和资源可用性更新,可以提高决策的准确性。这种混合模型提供了一个结构化的、透明的、适应性强的决策框架,确保了加权过程、材料排名和整体选择方法的透明度,从而为绿色建筑应用的数据驱动的可持续材料选择做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing green building decision-making with a hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model for material selection

Sustainable material selection is essential for minimizing environmental impact, resource depletion, and energy consumption in construction. We propose a hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS model to evaluate and rank four material alternatives based on nine sustainability criteria across three environmental, economic, and social dimensions. Fuzzy AHP determines criteria weights based on expert judgments, while TOPSIS ranks materials based on their relative closeness to the ideal sustainable solution. The results indicate that fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (GPC) ranked first (Ci = 0.885) due to its low carbon footprint and high recyclability, followed by cross-laminated timber (CLT) (Ci = 0.873), autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) (Ci = 0.832), and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) (Ci = 0.791). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the rankings, demonstrating the model’s adaptability to different sustainability priorities. However, expert judgment introduces subjectivity, and integrating real-time sustainability data, such as material lifecycle emissions and resource availability updates, could enhance decision-making accuracy. This hybrid model offers a structured, transparent, and adaptable decision-making framework, ensuring transparency in the weighting process, material ranking, and overall selection methodology, thereby contributing to data-driven sustainable material selection for green building applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信