探索儿童福利途径和双系统参与

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Denise C. Herz , Andrea Lane Eastman , Himal Suthar , Jacquelyn McCroskey
{"title":"探索儿童福利途径和双系统参与","authors":"Denise C. Herz ,&nbsp;Andrea Lane Eastman ,&nbsp;Himal Suthar ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn McCroskey","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study used sequence analysis to explore whether the timing and nature of child protective services (CPS) experiences led to CPS pathways and differential rates of juvenile justice involvement (i.e., dual system involvement).</div></div><div><h3>Data &amp; methods</h3><div>Retrospective cohorts of young people born between 1998 and 2001 and involved with CPS in Los Angeles County between birth and 18 were identified. Subsequent DSI was measured using linked administrative data from probation. Sequence analysis was applied prospectively to analyze how CPS experiences manifested into CPS pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four CPS pathways were produced: (1) Early Exit Pathway; (2) Childhood Limited Pathway; (3) Adolescent Pathway; and (4) Persistent (from childhood into adolescence) Pathway. The DSI rate was 5.0 %; however, DSI rates varied across pathways. The lowest rate was found for the Early Exit Pathway (1.5 %), and the rate for the Persistent Pathway was the highest (12.0 %). All pathways had increased likelihoods for DSI compared to the Early Exit Pathway, but the Persistent Pathway had largest likelihood increase.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Youth with persistent CPS involvement had the highest likelihood of DSI while those in the Adolescent Pathway accounted for the largest share of DSI. Findings highlight the importance of developmentally tailored strategies that respond to the timing of CPS involvement to reduce DSI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring child welfare pathways and dual system involvement\",\"authors\":\"Denise C. Herz ,&nbsp;Andrea Lane Eastman ,&nbsp;Himal Suthar ,&nbsp;Jacquelyn McCroskey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study used sequence analysis to explore whether the timing and nature of child protective services (CPS) experiences led to CPS pathways and differential rates of juvenile justice involvement (i.e., dual system involvement).</div></div><div><h3>Data &amp; methods</h3><div>Retrospective cohorts of young people born between 1998 and 2001 and involved with CPS in Los Angeles County between birth and 18 were identified. Subsequent DSI was measured using linked administrative data from probation. Sequence analysis was applied prospectively to analyze how CPS experiences manifested into CPS pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four CPS pathways were produced: (1) Early Exit Pathway; (2) Childhood Limited Pathway; (3) Adolescent Pathway; and (4) Persistent (from childhood into adolescence) Pathway. The DSI rate was 5.0 %; however, DSI rates varied across pathways. The lowest rate was found for the Early Exit Pathway (1.5 %), and the rate for the Persistent Pathway was the highest (12.0 %). All pathways had increased likelihoods for DSI compared to the Early Exit Pathway, but the Persistent Pathway had largest likelihood increase.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Youth with persistent CPS involvement had the highest likelihood of DSI while those in the Adolescent Pathway accounted for the largest share of DSI. Findings highlight the importance of developmentally tailored strategies that respond to the timing of CPS involvement to reduce DSI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000704\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225000704","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究采用序列分析探讨儿童保护服务(CPS)经历的时间和性质是否会导致CPS途径和少年司法参与(即双重系统参与)的不同比率。数据,方法对洛杉矶县1998年至2001年出生并在出生至18岁期间参与CPS的年轻人进行回顾性队列研究。随后的DSI是使用与试用期相关的管理数据来测量的。前瞻性应用序列分析分析CPS经验如何表现为CPS路径。结果形成了4条CPS通路:(1)早期退出通路;(2)儿童有限通路;(3)青少年路径;(4)持续性(从童年到青春期)途径。DSI率为5.0%;然而,DSI的发生率在不同的通路上有所不同。早期退出路径的发生率最低(1.5%),持久路径的发生率最高(12.0%)。与早期退出途径相比,所有途径发生DSI的可能性都增加了,但持续性途径的可能性增加最大。结论持续参与CPS的青少年发生DSI的可能性最高,而参与青少年途径的青少年发生DSI的比例最大。研究结果强调了发展量身定制的战略的重要性,这些战略响应CPS参与的时间以减少DSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring child welfare pathways and dual system involvement

Purpose

This study used sequence analysis to explore whether the timing and nature of child protective services (CPS) experiences led to CPS pathways and differential rates of juvenile justice involvement (i.e., dual system involvement).

Data & methods

Retrospective cohorts of young people born between 1998 and 2001 and involved with CPS in Los Angeles County between birth and 18 were identified. Subsequent DSI was measured using linked administrative data from probation. Sequence analysis was applied prospectively to analyze how CPS experiences manifested into CPS pathways.

Results

Four CPS pathways were produced: (1) Early Exit Pathway; (2) Childhood Limited Pathway; (3) Adolescent Pathway; and (4) Persistent (from childhood into adolescence) Pathway. The DSI rate was 5.0 %; however, DSI rates varied across pathways. The lowest rate was found for the Early Exit Pathway (1.5 %), and the rate for the Persistent Pathway was the highest (12.0 %). All pathways had increased likelihoods for DSI compared to the Early Exit Pathway, but the Persistent Pathway had largest likelihood increase.

Conclusion

Youth with persistent CPS involvement had the highest likelihood of DSI while those in the Adolescent Pathway accounted for the largest share of DSI. Findings highlight the importance of developmentally tailored strategies that respond to the timing of CPS involvement to reduce DSI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信