基于机器学习和微力学方法的页岩断裂韧性评价

IF 4.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Lei Han , Xian Shi , Hongjian Ni , Shu Jiang , Mingguang Che , Fengtao Qu
{"title":"基于机器学习和微力学方法的页岩断裂韧性评价","authors":"Lei Han ,&nbsp;Xian Shi ,&nbsp;Hongjian Ni ,&nbsp;Shu Jiang ,&nbsp;Mingguang Che ,&nbsp;Fengtao Qu","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fracture toughness of shale is of great significance for quantitatively evaluating the fracturability of shale reservoirs. Therefore, machine learning and nanoindentation mechanics testing techniques are used to study rock mechanics’ micro fracture toughness characteristics and complete the scale upgrade. Statistical nanoindentation and deep nanoindentation mechanical experiments (indentation morphology method) were conducted on rock samples from the Longmaxi Formation, and SEM images of indentation points were simultaneously collected. Based on the verification that the indentation range of the sample can represent the overall mechanical properties, machine learning methods were used to upgrade the scale modeling and conduct analysis and discussion. The results indicate that the fracture toughness based on the fracture length method is closer to Type I (tensile) fracture toughness, while the fracture toughness based on the energy method is closer to Type II (shear) fracture toughness, approximately three times that of Type I. Load strength and indentation depth are the main reasons for the difference in results between the two testing methods. The K-means dynamic homogeneous clustering machine learning method and deconvolution method can identify three physical phases: organic matter/clay, intermediate substances (composite phases), and hard minerals. The average errors between the obtained shale elastic modulus and hardness using machine learning algorithms and the deconvolution results are 3.70 % and 2.44 %, respectively. Compared to Gaussian deconvolution, the K-means clustering method can clarify the boundaries of individual physical clusters more clearly, making it easier to quantify the properties of clusters and evaluate the coupling relationship between physical quantities through two-dimensional and three-dimensional clustering. In addition, deconvolution methods can collaborate with K-means to determine initial cluster centers, further improving the accuracy of mechanical parameter interpretation for microscopic phases. The combination of statistical nanoindentation technology, deconvolution, machine learning, and other methods is of great significance for revealing the mechanical properties of heterogeneous shale at the micro nano scale and upgrading the scale, expanding the application of machine learning in the field of petroleum engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"323 ","pages":"Article 111194"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture toughness evaluation of shale based on machine learning and micromechanical approach\",\"authors\":\"Lei Han ,&nbsp;Xian Shi ,&nbsp;Hongjian Ni ,&nbsp;Shu Jiang ,&nbsp;Mingguang Che ,&nbsp;Fengtao Qu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The fracture toughness of shale is of great significance for quantitatively evaluating the fracturability of shale reservoirs. Therefore, machine learning and nanoindentation mechanics testing techniques are used to study rock mechanics’ micro fracture toughness characteristics and complete the scale upgrade. Statistical nanoindentation and deep nanoindentation mechanical experiments (indentation morphology method) were conducted on rock samples from the Longmaxi Formation, and SEM images of indentation points were simultaneously collected. Based on the verification that the indentation range of the sample can represent the overall mechanical properties, machine learning methods were used to upgrade the scale modeling and conduct analysis and discussion. The results indicate that the fracture toughness based on the fracture length method is closer to Type I (tensile) fracture toughness, while the fracture toughness based on the energy method is closer to Type II (shear) fracture toughness, approximately three times that of Type I. Load strength and indentation depth are the main reasons for the difference in results between the two testing methods. The K-means dynamic homogeneous clustering machine learning method and deconvolution method can identify three physical phases: organic matter/clay, intermediate substances (composite phases), and hard minerals. The average errors between the obtained shale elastic modulus and hardness using machine learning algorithms and the deconvolution results are 3.70 % and 2.44 %, respectively. Compared to Gaussian deconvolution, the K-means clustering method can clarify the boundaries of individual physical clusters more clearly, making it easier to quantify the properties of clusters and evaluate the coupling relationship between physical quantities through two-dimensional and three-dimensional clustering. In addition, deconvolution methods can collaborate with K-means to determine initial cluster centers, further improving the accuracy of mechanical parameter interpretation for microscopic phases. The combination of statistical nanoindentation technology, deconvolution, machine learning, and other methods is of great significance for revealing the mechanical properties of heterogeneous shale at the micro nano scale and upgrading the scale, expanding the application of machine learning in the field of petroleum engineering.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Fracture Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"323 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Fracture Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794425003959\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794425003959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

页岩的断裂韧性对于定量评价页岩储层的可压裂性具有重要意义。因此,利用机器学习和纳米压痕力学测试技术,研究岩石力学的微观断裂韧性特征,完成尺度升级。对龙马溪组岩样进行了统计纳米压痕和深度纳米压痕力学实验(压痕形貌法),同时采集了压痕点的SEM图像。在验证试样压痕范围可以代表整体力学性能的基础上,利用机器学习方法对比例建模进行升级,并进行分析讨论。结果表明,基于断裂长度法的断裂韧性更接近于I型(拉伸)断裂韧性,而基于能量法的断裂韧性更接近于II型(剪切)断裂韧性,约为I型断裂韧性的3倍。载荷强度和压痕深度是两种测试方法结果差异的主要原因。K-means动态同质聚类机器学习方法和反褶积方法可以识别三个物理阶段:有机质/粘土、中间物质(复合相)和硬矿物。利用机器学习算法获得的页岩弹性模量和硬度与反褶积结果的平均误差分别为3.70%和2.44%。与高斯反卷积相比,K-means聚类方法可以更清晰地厘清单个物理簇的边界,更容易通过二维和三维聚类来量化簇的性质,评估物理量之间的耦合关系。此外,反褶积方法可以与K-means协同确定初始簇中心,进一步提高微观相力学参数解释的准确性。统计纳米压痕技术与反褶积、机器学习等方法的结合,对于在微纳米尺度上揭示非均质页岩的力学性质并提升尺度,拓展机器学习在石油工程领域的应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fracture toughness evaluation of shale based on machine learning and micromechanical approach
The fracture toughness of shale is of great significance for quantitatively evaluating the fracturability of shale reservoirs. Therefore, machine learning and nanoindentation mechanics testing techniques are used to study rock mechanics’ micro fracture toughness characteristics and complete the scale upgrade. Statistical nanoindentation and deep nanoindentation mechanical experiments (indentation morphology method) were conducted on rock samples from the Longmaxi Formation, and SEM images of indentation points were simultaneously collected. Based on the verification that the indentation range of the sample can represent the overall mechanical properties, machine learning methods were used to upgrade the scale modeling and conduct analysis and discussion. The results indicate that the fracture toughness based on the fracture length method is closer to Type I (tensile) fracture toughness, while the fracture toughness based on the energy method is closer to Type II (shear) fracture toughness, approximately three times that of Type I. Load strength and indentation depth are the main reasons for the difference in results between the two testing methods. The K-means dynamic homogeneous clustering machine learning method and deconvolution method can identify three physical phases: organic matter/clay, intermediate substances (composite phases), and hard minerals. The average errors between the obtained shale elastic modulus and hardness using machine learning algorithms and the deconvolution results are 3.70 % and 2.44 %, respectively. Compared to Gaussian deconvolution, the K-means clustering method can clarify the boundaries of individual physical clusters more clearly, making it easier to quantify the properties of clusters and evaluate the coupling relationship between physical quantities through two-dimensional and three-dimensional clustering. In addition, deconvolution methods can collaborate with K-means to determine initial cluster centers, further improving the accuracy of mechanical parameter interpretation for microscopic phases. The combination of statistical nanoindentation technology, deconvolution, machine learning, and other methods is of great significance for revealing the mechanical properties of heterogeneous shale at the micro nano scale and upgrading the scale, expanding the application of machine learning in the field of petroleum engineering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信