性与性别差异学生的支持性学校策略:欺凌受害经历与学校安全感关联的元分析

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ruby van Vliet , Rozemarijn van der Ploeg , Tina Kretschmer , Wouter J. Kiekens , Laura Baams
{"title":"性与性别差异学生的支持性学校策略:欺凌受害经历与学校安全感关联的元分析","authors":"Ruby van Vliet ,&nbsp;Rozemarijn van der Ploeg ,&nbsp;Tina Kretschmer ,&nbsp;Wouter J. Kiekens ,&nbsp;Laura Baams","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sexually and gender-diverse secondary school students experience more bullying-victimization and feel less safe at school than their heterosexual, cisgender peers. Therefore, clarifying the associations of various LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies (enumerated policies, school-staff training, inclusive curriculum, GSAs) with these school experiences is crucial. Furthermore, it is important to determine who benefits most from these strategies and how differences in study characteristics affect findings. We used a multivariate meta-analytic model with an approximated variance-covariance matrix to investigate the associations between LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies and both outcomes: students’ bullying-victimization experiences and school safety feelings. Our findings showed that students in secondary schools with LGBTQ-targeted strategies reported lower bullying-victimization and higher feelings of school safety, although the associations were modest. While these strategies seemed to benefit sexually and gender diverse students more and thus seem to help reduce the disparities, students of color seemed to benefit less. Furthermore, compared to research reports, peer-reviewed studies showed more variability across multiple outcomes, such as types of victimization or student sub-groups. A notable research gap exists regarding the role of school-staff training in relation to these outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100689"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supportive school strategies for sexually and gender diverse students: A meta-analysis of the associations with bullying-victimization experiences and feelings of school safety\",\"authors\":\"Ruby van Vliet ,&nbsp;Rozemarijn van der Ploeg ,&nbsp;Tina Kretschmer ,&nbsp;Wouter J. Kiekens ,&nbsp;Laura Baams\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sexually and gender-diverse secondary school students experience more bullying-victimization and feel less safe at school than their heterosexual, cisgender peers. Therefore, clarifying the associations of various LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies (enumerated policies, school-staff training, inclusive curriculum, GSAs) with these school experiences is crucial. Furthermore, it is important to determine who benefits most from these strategies and how differences in study characteristics affect findings. We used a multivariate meta-analytic model with an approximated variance-covariance matrix to investigate the associations between LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies and both outcomes: students’ bullying-victimization experiences and school safety feelings. Our findings showed that students in secondary schools with LGBTQ-targeted strategies reported lower bullying-victimization and higher feelings of school safety, although the associations were modest. While these strategies seemed to benefit sexually and gender diverse students more and thus seem to help reduce the disparities, students of color seemed to benefit less. Furthermore, compared to research reports, peer-reviewed studies showed more variability across multiple outcomes, such as types of victimization or student sub-groups. A notable research gap exists regarding the role of school-staff training in relation to these outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X25000260\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X25000260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性和性别不同的中学生比他们的异性恋、顺性同龄人更容易遭受欺凌,在学校里感到更不安全。因此,明确各种针对lgbtq的校本策略(列举政策、学校员工培训、包容性课程、gsa)与这些学校经验的关联至关重要。此外,重要的是确定谁从这些策略中获益最多,以及研究特征的差异如何影响研究结果。本研究采用多元元分析模型和近似方差-协方差矩阵,探讨以lgbtq为目标的校本策略与学生欺凌受害经历和校园安全感受之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,采用lgbtq目标策略的中学学生报告的欺凌受害率较低,学校安全感较高,尽管两者之间的关联并不大。虽然这些策略似乎更有利于性别多样化的学生,因此似乎有助于缩小差距,但有色人种的学生似乎受益较少。此外,与研究报告相比,同行评议的研究显示,在多种结果(如受害类型或学生分组)中,差异更大。关于学校员工培训在这些结果中的作用,存在着显著的研究差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supportive school strategies for sexually and gender diverse students: A meta-analysis of the associations with bullying-victimization experiences and feelings of school safety
Sexually and gender-diverse secondary school students experience more bullying-victimization and feel less safe at school than their heterosexual, cisgender peers. Therefore, clarifying the associations of various LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies (enumerated policies, school-staff training, inclusive curriculum, GSAs) with these school experiences is crucial. Furthermore, it is important to determine who benefits most from these strategies and how differences in study characteristics affect findings. We used a multivariate meta-analytic model with an approximated variance-covariance matrix to investigate the associations between LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies and both outcomes: students’ bullying-victimization experiences and school safety feelings. Our findings showed that students in secondary schools with LGBTQ-targeted strategies reported lower bullying-victimization and higher feelings of school safety, although the associations were modest. While these strategies seemed to benefit sexually and gender diverse students more and thus seem to help reduce the disparities, students of color seemed to benefit less. Furthermore, compared to research reports, peer-reviewed studies showed more variability across multiple outcomes, such as types of victimization or student sub-groups. A notable research gap exists regarding the role of school-staff training in relation to these outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信