C.A. Wagenaar , J. Christiaans , V. Hermans , W. Walrabenstein , F.A. Koopman , H. van Middendorp , D. van Schaardenburg
{"title":"多学科生活方式干预对类风湿关节炎和骨关节炎患者压力相关参数的影响:“关节植物”随机对照试验的二次分析","authors":"C.A. Wagenaar , J. Christiaans , V. Hermans , W. Walrabenstein , F.A. Koopman , H. van Middendorp , D. van Schaardenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.cpnec.2025.100298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In two randomized controlled trials, the Plants for Joints (PFJ) multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention reduced signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or metabolic syndrome-associated hip or knee osteoarthritis (MSOA) compared with usual care. This secondary analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the PFJ intervention on stress-related parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In two PFJ observer-blind randomized controlled trials (RCT), people with (1) RA with low-moderate disease activity or (2) MSOA were randomized to receive the PFJ lifestyle intervention or usual care. The 16-week PFJ intervention consisted of a whole-food plant-based diet, physical activity, and sleep and stress management. This secondary analysis investigated stress-related outcomes including heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV: root square mean of successive differences (RMSSD) and normalised high frequency (HFnorm), salivary cortisol, perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale 10; PSS-10), and time spent on stress-reducing activities. An intention-to-treat analysis with a linear regression model (HRV) or linear mixed model (cortisol and PSS-10), adjusted for baseline values, was used to analyse between-group differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>77 people with RA and 64 with MSOA completed the RCT. RA participants following the PFJ intervention showed a significant improvement in HFnorm (between-group difference: 6.6; 95 % CI 0.5, 12.6) and an improving trend in RMSSD (4.3; 95 % CI -1.5, 10.1) alongside non-significant reductions of heart rate (3.1; 95 % CI-3.9, 10.1), salivary cortisol (1.3; 95 % CI -0.6, 3.1) and perceived stress (−2.0; 95 % CI -4.4, 0.3), compared to usual care. In participants with MSOA, there were no differences in heart rate, HRV outcomes, cortisol, or perceived stress between the intervention and control group. Both RA and MSOA participants temporarily increased time spent on stress-reducing activities, yet no change from baseline was observed after 16 weeks. In RA participants increased time spent on stress-reducing activities was associated with increased HFnorm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This secondary analysis suggests the PFJ program may have a positive influence on stress-related parameters in people with RA, but not MSOA, compared to usual care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72656,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention on stress-related parameters in people with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: secondary analysis of the \\\"Plants for Joints\\\" randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"C.A. Wagenaar , J. Christiaans , V. Hermans , W. Walrabenstein , F.A. Koopman , H. van Middendorp , D. van Schaardenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpnec.2025.100298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In two randomized controlled trials, the Plants for Joints (PFJ) multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention reduced signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or metabolic syndrome-associated hip or knee osteoarthritis (MSOA) compared with usual care. This secondary analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the PFJ intervention on stress-related parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In two PFJ observer-blind randomized controlled trials (RCT), people with (1) RA with low-moderate disease activity or (2) MSOA were randomized to receive the PFJ lifestyle intervention or usual care. The 16-week PFJ intervention consisted of a whole-food plant-based diet, physical activity, and sleep and stress management. This secondary analysis investigated stress-related outcomes including heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV: root square mean of successive differences (RMSSD) and normalised high frequency (HFnorm), salivary cortisol, perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale 10; PSS-10), and time spent on stress-reducing activities. An intention-to-treat analysis with a linear regression model (HRV) or linear mixed model (cortisol and PSS-10), adjusted for baseline values, was used to analyse between-group differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>77 people with RA and 64 with MSOA completed the RCT. RA participants following the PFJ intervention showed a significant improvement in HFnorm (between-group difference: 6.6; 95 % CI 0.5, 12.6) and an improving trend in RMSSD (4.3; 95 % CI -1.5, 10.1) alongside non-significant reductions of heart rate (3.1; 95 % CI-3.9, 10.1), salivary cortisol (1.3; 95 % CI -0.6, 3.1) and perceived stress (−2.0; 95 % CI -4.4, 0.3), compared to usual care. In participants with MSOA, there were no differences in heart rate, HRV outcomes, cortisol, or perceived stress between the intervention and control group. Both RA and MSOA participants temporarily increased time spent on stress-reducing activities, yet no change from baseline was observed after 16 weeks. In RA participants increased time spent on stress-reducing activities was associated with increased HFnorm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This secondary analysis suggests the PFJ program may have a positive influence on stress-related parameters in people with RA, but not MSOA, compared to usual care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666497625000177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666497625000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在两项随机对照试验中,与常规治疗相比,关节植物(PFJ)多学科生活方式干预减少了类风湿性关节炎(RA)或代谢综合征相关髋关节或膝关节骨性关节炎(MSOA)的体征和症状。这项二级分析旨在评估PFJ干预对应力相关参数的影响。方法在两项PFJ观察盲随机对照试验(RCT)中,(1)RA伴中低疾病活动度或(2)MSOA患者随机接受PFJ生活方式干预或常规护理。为期16周的PFJ干预包括全食物植物性饮食、体育活动、睡眠和压力管理。这项二级分析调查了与压力相关的结果,包括心率、心率变异性(HRV:连续差异均方根(RMSSD)和正常化高频(HFnorm))、唾液皮质醇、感知压力(感知压力量表10;PSS-10),以及花在减压活动上的时间。使用线性回归模型(HRV)或线性混合模型(皮质醇和PSS-10)进行意向治疗分析,调整基线值,分析组间差异。结果77例RA患者和64例MSOA患者完成了RCT。RA参与者在PFJ干预后HFnorm显著改善(组间差异:6.6;95% CI 0.5, 12.6), RMSSD有改善趋势(4.3;95% CI -1.5, 10.1),同时心率无显著降低(3.1;95% CI-3.9, 10.1),唾液皮质醇(1.3;95% CI -0.6, 3.1)和感知压力(- 2.0;95% CI -4.4, 0.3)。在MSOA参与者中,干预组和对照组在心率、HRV结果、皮质醇或感知压力方面没有差异。RA和MSOA参与者都暂时增加了用于减压活动的时间,但在16周后没有观察到基线的变化。在RA参与者中,花在减压活动上的时间增加与HFnorm增加有关。结论:与常规治疗相比,PFJ计划可能对RA患者的压力相关参数有积极影响,但对MSOA没有积极影响。
Effect of a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention on stress-related parameters in people with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: secondary analysis of the "Plants for Joints" randomized controlled trial
Objective
In two randomized controlled trials, the Plants for Joints (PFJ) multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention reduced signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or metabolic syndrome-associated hip or knee osteoarthritis (MSOA) compared with usual care. This secondary analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the PFJ intervention on stress-related parameters.
Methods
In two PFJ observer-blind randomized controlled trials (RCT), people with (1) RA with low-moderate disease activity or (2) MSOA were randomized to receive the PFJ lifestyle intervention or usual care. The 16-week PFJ intervention consisted of a whole-food plant-based diet, physical activity, and sleep and stress management. This secondary analysis investigated stress-related outcomes including heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV: root square mean of successive differences (RMSSD) and normalised high frequency (HFnorm), salivary cortisol, perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale 10; PSS-10), and time spent on stress-reducing activities. An intention-to-treat analysis with a linear regression model (HRV) or linear mixed model (cortisol and PSS-10), adjusted for baseline values, was used to analyse between-group differences.
Results
77 people with RA and 64 with MSOA completed the RCT. RA participants following the PFJ intervention showed a significant improvement in HFnorm (between-group difference: 6.6; 95 % CI 0.5, 12.6) and an improving trend in RMSSD (4.3; 95 % CI -1.5, 10.1) alongside non-significant reductions of heart rate (3.1; 95 % CI-3.9, 10.1), salivary cortisol (1.3; 95 % CI -0.6, 3.1) and perceived stress (−2.0; 95 % CI -4.4, 0.3), compared to usual care. In participants with MSOA, there were no differences in heart rate, HRV outcomes, cortisol, or perceived stress between the intervention and control group. Both RA and MSOA participants temporarily increased time spent on stress-reducing activities, yet no change from baseline was observed after 16 weeks. In RA participants increased time spent on stress-reducing activities was associated with increased HFnorm.
Conclusion
This secondary analysis suggests the PFJ program may have a positive influence on stress-related parameters in people with RA, but not MSOA, compared to usual care.