{"title":"检视中国公共部门与非公共部门的工资差距:来自稳健分位数选择模型的见解","authors":"Qingquan Liang, Weihong Zeng, Lan Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the wage gap between public and non-public sectors, which constitute a key component of overall wage inequality in China. While quantile models are traditionally employed to analyze such wage gaps, their conventional implementations face methodological challenges, particularly in addressing endogeneity issues stemming from restrictive assumptions. Our empirical analysis of China's sectoral wage gap reveals that these conventional models fail to satisfy model specification tests, primarily due to bias introduced by residual terms in regression coefficient predictions. To address these limitations, we employ a robust quantile selection model that mitigates the restrictive assumptions. The results demonstrate a significant public sector wage premium—approximately 25 % on average—with the disparity being most pronounced among low quantiles. The analysis also reveals that previous models' prediction systematically underestimated public sector wage spillovers, and in some cases, mistakenly concluded that public sector wages were lower than those in the non-public sector. A detailed decomposition indicates that observable characteristics can explain over 80 % of the total wage gap in 2018. In comparison, the more extensive implementation of market-oriented reforms in state-owned enterprises corresponds to a reduced wage premium and unexplained portion. Finally, factor analysis identifies returns to human capital, demographic composition changes, and risk preferences emerge as key drivers, while the impact of industrial restructuring appears negligible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102427"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the wage gap between public and non-public sector in China: Insights from a robust quantile selection model\",\"authors\":\"Qingquan Liang, Weihong Zeng, Lan Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the wage gap between public and non-public sectors, which constitute a key component of overall wage inequality in China. While quantile models are traditionally employed to analyze such wage gaps, their conventional implementations face methodological challenges, particularly in addressing endogeneity issues stemming from restrictive assumptions. Our empirical analysis of China's sectoral wage gap reveals that these conventional models fail to satisfy model specification tests, primarily due to bias introduced by residual terms in regression coefficient predictions. To address these limitations, we employ a robust quantile selection model that mitigates the restrictive assumptions. The results demonstrate a significant public sector wage premium—approximately 25 % on average—with the disparity being most pronounced among low quantiles. The analysis also reveals that previous models' prediction systematically underestimated public sector wage spillovers, and in some cases, mistakenly concluded that public sector wages were lower than those in the non-public sector. A detailed decomposition indicates that observable characteristics can explain over 80 % of the total wage gap in 2018. In comparison, the more extensive implementation of market-oriented reforms in state-owned enterprises corresponds to a reduced wage premium and unexplained portion. Finally, factor analysis identifies returns to human capital, demographic composition changes, and risk preferences emerge as key drivers, while the impact of industrial restructuring appears negligible.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000859\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000859","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining the wage gap between public and non-public sector in China: Insights from a robust quantile selection model
This study examines the wage gap between public and non-public sectors, which constitute a key component of overall wage inequality in China. While quantile models are traditionally employed to analyze such wage gaps, their conventional implementations face methodological challenges, particularly in addressing endogeneity issues stemming from restrictive assumptions. Our empirical analysis of China's sectoral wage gap reveals that these conventional models fail to satisfy model specification tests, primarily due to bias introduced by residual terms in regression coefficient predictions. To address these limitations, we employ a robust quantile selection model that mitigates the restrictive assumptions. The results demonstrate a significant public sector wage premium—approximately 25 % on average—with the disparity being most pronounced among low quantiles. The analysis also reveals that previous models' prediction systematically underestimated public sector wage spillovers, and in some cases, mistakenly concluded that public sector wages were lower than those in the non-public sector. A detailed decomposition indicates that observable characteristics can explain over 80 % of the total wage gap in 2018. In comparison, the more extensive implementation of market-oriented reforms in state-owned enterprises corresponds to a reduced wage premium and unexplained portion. Finally, factor analysis identifies returns to human capital, demographic composition changes, and risk preferences emerge as key drivers, while the impact of industrial restructuring appears negligible.
期刊介绍:
The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.