创造性阅读对英语学习者批判性思维和阅读理解的影响

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Gholamhossein Shahini , Seyyed Morteza Hashemi Toroujeni , Mohammad Reza Ebrahimi
{"title":"创造性阅读对英语学习者批判性思维和阅读理解的影响","authors":"Gholamhossein Shahini ,&nbsp;Seyyed Morteza Hashemi Toroujeni ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evolving trends of the new millennium towards being equipped with particular skills stipulate that individuals are obliged to procure critical thinking skills (henceforth CTSs) for their intellectual development. Cultivation of creativity in pedagogies contributes to sustaining critical thinking. Considering age and gender stereotypes, the current research set out to cast light on whether EFL learners’ CTSs and reading comprehension skills (henceforth RCSs) can be ameliorated through employing creative reading practices to help learners think beyond the conventional boundaries to fully grasp the author's intent and derive meaningful insights. To achieve the goals, sixty homogeneous EFL learners were randomly distributed to control and experimental groups within a framework of quantitative and true-experimental method using pre and post-test design. Before the intervention, the pre-tests revealed no statistically significant difference between CTSs and RCSs of the two groups. Over three months, experimental group (EG) (n=28) and control group (CG) (n=32) received creative reading and regular reading instructions, respectively. At the end of the instructions, the results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the level of CTSs and RCSs of two groups. Based on the findings, the EG's CTSs and RCSs improved after receiving the intervention, although no significant improvement was found between performances of CG on pre- and post-tests. Furthermore, the older EFL learners of EG outperformed younger ones, though male and female learners did the same. These findings highlight the effectiveness of creative reading in fostering critical thinking and comprehension skills in EFL contexts, suggesting valuable pedagogical implications for educators seeking to enhance learners' cognitive abilities. This research contributes to the field by demonstrating that creative reading practices significantly enhance critical thinking and reading comprehension skills among EFL learners, suggesting that integrating creativity into language pedagogy can lead to improved cognitive outcomes and better prepare learners for complex intellectual challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creative Reading's Impact on EFL Learners' Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension\",\"authors\":\"Gholamhossein Shahini ,&nbsp;Seyyed Morteza Hashemi Toroujeni ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Ebrahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Evolving trends of the new millennium towards being equipped with particular skills stipulate that individuals are obliged to procure critical thinking skills (henceforth CTSs) for their intellectual development. Cultivation of creativity in pedagogies contributes to sustaining critical thinking. Considering age and gender stereotypes, the current research set out to cast light on whether EFL learners’ CTSs and reading comprehension skills (henceforth RCSs) can be ameliorated through employing creative reading practices to help learners think beyond the conventional boundaries to fully grasp the author's intent and derive meaningful insights. To achieve the goals, sixty homogeneous EFL learners were randomly distributed to control and experimental groups within a framework of quantitative and true-experimental method using pre and post-test design. Before the intervention, the pre-tests revealed no statistically significant difference between CTSs and RCSs of the two groups. Over three months, experimental group (EG) (n=28) and control group (CG) (n=32) received creative reading and regular reading instructions, respectively. At the end of the instructions, the results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the level of CTSs and RCSs of two groups. Based on the findings, the EG's CTSs and RCSs improved after receiving the intervention, although no significant improvement was found between performances of CG on pre- and post-tests. Furthermore, the older EFL learners of EG outperformed younger ones, though male and female learners did the same. These findings highlight the effectiveness of creative reading in fostering critical thinking and comprehension skills in EFL contexts, suggesting valuable pedagogical implications for educators seeking to enhance learners' cognitive abilities. This research contributes to the field by demonstrating that creative reading practices significantly enhance critical thinking and reading comprehension skills among EFL learners, suggesting that integrating creativity into language pedagogy can lead to improved cognitive outcomes and better prepare learners for complex intellectual challenges.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712500104X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712500104X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新千年的发展趋势是要具备特定的技能,这一趋势规定,个人有义务获得批判性思维技能(以下简称cts),以促进他们的智力发展。在教学中培养创造力有助于保持批判性思维。考虑到年龄和性别的刻板印象,目前的研究旨在揭示是否可以通过创造性阅读练习来帮助学习者超越传统界限思考,充分把握作者的意图并获得有意义的见解,从而改善英语学习者的CTSs和阅读理解技能(以下简称rcs)。本研究采用定量和真实实验的方法,采用测试前和测试后设计,将60名同质英语学习者随机分为对照组和实验组。干预前的预试结果显示,两组的CTSs和rcs差异无统计学意义。三个月后,实验组(EG) (n=28)和对照组(CG) (n=32)分别接受创造性阅读和常规阅读指导。在指令结束时,结果显示两组的CTSs和rcs水平有统计学差异。根据研究结果,在接受干预后,EG的CTSs和rcs得到改善,尽管CG在前后测试中的表现没有显著改善。此外,年龄较大的英语学习者在EG中的表现优于年龄较小的学习者,尽管男性和女性学习者的表现相同。这些发现强调了创造性阅读在培养英语语境中的批判性思维和理解能力方面的有效性,为寻求提高学习者认知能力的教育工作者提供了有价值的教学启示。这项研究通过证明创造性阅读练习可以显著提高英语学习者的批判性思维和阅读理解能力,表明将创造性融入语言教学可以改善认知结果,更好地为学习者应对复杂的智力挑战做好准备,从而对该领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creative Reading's Impact on EFL Learners' Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension
Evolving trends of the new millennium towards being equipped with particular skills stipulate that individuals are obliged to procure critical thinking skills (henceforth CTSs) for their intellectual development. Cultivation of creativity in pedagogies contributes to sustaining critical thinking. Considering age and gender stereotypes, the current research set out to cast light on whether EFL learners’ CTSs and reading comprehension skills (henceforth RCSs) can be ameliorated through employing creative reading practices to help learners think beyond the conventional boundaries to fully grasp the author's intent and derive meaningful insights. To achieve the goals, sixty homogeneous EFL learners were randomly distributed to control and experimental groups within a framework of quantitative and true-experimental method using pre and post-test design. Before the intervention, the pre-tests revealed no statistically significant difference between CTSs and RCSs of the two groups. Over three months, experimental group (EG) (n=28) and control group (CG) (n=32) received creative reading and regular reading instructions, respectively. At the end of the instructions, the results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the level of CTSs and RCSs of two groups. Based on the findings, the EG's CTSs and RCSs improved after receiving the intervention, although no significant improvement was found between performances of CG on pre- and post-tests. Furthermore, the older EFL learners of EG outperformed younger ones, though male and female learners did the same. These findings highlight the effectiveness of creative reading in fostering critical thinking and comprehension skills in EFL contexts, suggesting valuable pedagogical implications for educators seeking to enhance learners' cognitive abilities. This research contributes to the field by demonstrating that creative reading practices significantly enhance critical thinking and reading comprehension skills among EFL learners, suggesting that integrating creativity into language pedagogy can lead to improved cognitive outcomes and better prepare learners for complex intellectual challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信