用有机化合物的理化性质估计其气相色谱保留指数的逻辑准则

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Igor G. Zenkevich
{"title":"用有机化合物的理化性质估计其气相色谱保留指数的逻辑准则","authors":"Igor G. Zenkevich","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is no unified equation that would correlate gas chromatographic retention indices of any organic compounds with their normal boiling points (at atmospheric pressure). Nevertheless, RI estimation with acceptable accuracy is possible using principal physicochemical properties, namely, boiling points, relative densities, and indices of refraction. The main feature of the algorithms proposed is the application of a logical criteria for comparing so-called indices of boiling points I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>), molecular weights I(<em>M</em>), and molar refractions I(MR<sub>D</sub>). If the comparison of these indices confirms the approximate equality of any two or all three of them (that is typical for nonpolar organic compounds), then as the best estimate of GC retention indices (RI<sub>calc</sub>) we can accept I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) values without any additional calculations. Such comparison is formally equivalent to the application of logical criteria for I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>), I(<em>M</em>), and I(MR<sub>D</sub>) values. For polar analytes, the relation I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) &gt; <em>I</em>(MR<sub>D</sub>) &gt; <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) is valid, and in these cases the inequality I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) &gt; RI<sub>calc</sub> &gt; <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) appeared to be correct. Instead of large intervals between <em>I</em>(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) and <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) for estimating RI<sub>calc</sub>, the use of the relation RI<sub>calc</sub> ≈ (1 – <em>a</em>)I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) + <em>a</em>I(MR<sub>D</sub>) + <em>b</em> is proposed. The indices of molecular weights are not used for the calculations directly, but they are needed just for application of the logical criteria.</div><div>The average accuracy of RI estimation by the method proposed is 9–16 index units for nonpolar compounds of any chemical nature and up to 27 for polar analytes. This high accuracy is comparable to that of the more sophisticated modern algorithms. The restriction of this approach is the impossibility of applying it to poly- and perfluoroorganic compounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1754 ","pages":"Article 465983"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logical criteria for estimating gas chromatographic retention indices of organic compounds using their physicochemical properties\",\"authors\":\"Igor G. Zenkevich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is no unified equation that would correlate gas chromatographic retention indices of any organic compounds with their normal boiling points (at atmospheric pressure). Nevertheless, RI estimation with acceptable accuracy is possible using principal physicochemical properties, namely, boiling points, relative densities, and indices of refraction. The main feature of the algorithms proposed is the application of a logical criteria for comparing so-called indices of boiling points I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>), molecular weights I(<em>M</em>), and molar refractions I(MR<sub>D</sub>). If the comparison of these indices confirms the approximate equality of any two or all three of them (that is typical for nonpolar organic compounds), then as the best estimate of GC retention indices (RI<sub>calc</sub>) we can accept I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) values without any additional calculations. Such comparison is formally equivalent to the application of logical criteria for I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>), I(<em>M</em>), and I(MR<sub>D</sub>) values. For polar analytes, the relation I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) &gt; <em>I</em>(MR<sub>D</sub>) &gt; <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) is valid, and in these cases the inequality I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) &gt; RI<sub>calc</sub> &gt; <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) appeared to be correct. Instead of large intervals between <em>I</em>(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) and <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) for estimating RI<sub>calc</sub>, the use of the relation RI<sub>calc</sub> ≈ (1 – <em>a</em>)I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) + <em>a</em>I(MR<sub>D</sub>) + <em>b</em> is proposed. The indices of molecular weights are not used for the calculations directly, but they are needed just for application of the logical criteria.</div><div>The average accuracy of RI estimation by the method proposed is 9–16 index units for nonpolar compounds of any chemical nature and up to 27 for polar analytes. This high accuracy is comparable to that of the more sophisticated modern algorithms. The restriction of this approach is the impossibility of applying it to poly- and perfluoroorganic compounds.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"volume\":\"1754 \",\"pages\":\"Article 465983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325003310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325003310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

没有统一的公式可以将任何有机化合物的气相色谱保留指数与其正常沸点(在大气压下)联系起来。然而,利用主要的物理化学性质,即沸点、相对密度和折射率,估计具有可接受精度的RI是可能的。提出的算法的主要特点是应用逻辑标准来比较所谓的沸点I(Tb),分子量I(M)和摩尔折射率I(MRD)的指数。如果这些指标的比较证实了其中任何两个或全部三个指标的近似相等(这是非极性有机化合物的典型情况),那么作为GC保留指数(RIcalc)的最佳估计,我们可以接受I(Tb)值,而无需任何额外的计算。这种比较在形式上等价于对I(Tb)、I(M)和I(MRD)值应用逻辑标准。对于极性分析物,关系式I(Tb) >;我(MRD)的在I(M)是有效的,在这些情况下不等式I(Tb) >;RIcalc祝辞I(M)似乎是正确的。本文提出了RIcalc≈(1 - a)I(Tb) + aI(MRD) + b的关系,而不是I(Tb)和I(M)之间的大间隔来估计RIcalc。分子质量的指标不直接用于计算,而只是用于逻辑准则的应用。该方法估算RI的平均精度为9-16个指标单位,对于任何化学性质的非极性化合物和高达27个指标单位的极性分析物。这种高精度可与更复杂的现代算法相媲美。这种方法的限制是不可能将其应用于多氟和全氟有机化合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Logical criteria for estimating gas chromatographic retention indices of organic compounds using their physicochemical properties
There is no unified equation that would correlate gas chromatographic retention indices of any organic compounds with their normal boiling points (at atmospheric pressure). Nevertheless, RI estimation with acceptable accuracy is possible using principal physicochemical properties, namely, boiling points, relative densities, and indices of refraction. The main feature of the algorithms proposed is the application of a logical criteria for comparing so-called indices of boiling points I(Tb), molecular weights I(M), and molar refractions I(MRD). If the comparison of these indices confirms the approximate equality of any two or all three of them (that is typical for nonpolar organic compounds), then as the best estimate of GC retention indices (RIcalc) we can accept I(Tb) values without any additional calculations. Such comparison is formally equivalent to the application of logical criteria for I(Tb), I(M), and I(MRD) values. For polar analytes, the relation I(Tb) > I(MRD) > I(M) is valid, and in these cases the inequality I(Tb) > RIcalc > I(M) appeared to be correct. Instead of large intervals between I(Tb) and I(M) for estimating RIcalc, the use of the relation RIcalc ≈ (1 – a)I(Tb) + aI(MRD) + b is proposed. The indices of molecular weights are not used for the calculations directly, but they are needed just for application of the logical criteria.
The average accuracy of RI estimation by the method proposed is 9–16 index units for nonpolar compounds of any chemical nature and up to 27 for polar analytes. This high accuracy is comparable to that of the more sophisticated modern algorithms. The restriction of this approach is the impossibility of applying it to poly- and perfluoroorganic compounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal of Chromatography A 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
14.60%
发文量
742
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信