{"title":"用有机化合物的理化性质估计其气相色谱保留指数的逻辑准则","authors":"Igor G. Zenkevich","doi":"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is no unified equation that would correlate gas chromatographic retention indices of any organic compounds with their normal boiling points (at atmospheric pressure). Nevertheless, RI estimation with acceptable accuracy is possible using principal physicochemical properties, namely, boiling points, relative densities, and indices of refraction. The main feature of the algorithms proposed is the application of a logical criteria for comparing so-called indices of boiling points I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>), molecular weights I(<em>M</em>), and molar refractions I(MR<sub>D</sub>). If the comparison of these indices confirms the approximate equality of any two or all three of them (that is typical for nonpolar organic compounds), then as the best estimate of GC retention indices (RI<sub>calc</sub>) we can accept I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) values without any additional calculations. Such comparison is formally equivalent to the application of logical criteria for I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>), I(<em>M</em>), and I(MR<sub>D</sub>) values. For polar analytes, the relation I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) > <em>I</em>(MR<sub>D</sub>) > <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) is valid, and in these cases the inequality I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) > RI<sub>calc</sub> > <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) appeared to be correct. Instead of large intervals between <em>I</em>(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) and <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) for estimating RI<sub>calc</sub>, the use of the relation RI<sub>calc</sub> ≈ (1 – <em>a</em>)I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) + <em>a</em>I(MR<sub>D</sub>) + <em>b</em> is proposed. The indices of molecular weights are not used for the calculations directly, but they are needed just for application of the logical criteria.</div><div>The average accuracy of RI estimation by the method proposed is 9–16 index units for nonpolar compounds of any chemical nature and up to 27 for polar analytes. This high accuracy is comparable to that of the more sophisticated modern algorithms. The restriction of this approach is the impossibility of applying it to poly- and perfluoroorganic compounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography A","volume":"1754 ","pages":"Article 465983"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logical criteria for estimating gas chromatographic retention indices of organic compounds using their physicochemical properties\",\"authors\":\"Igor G. Zenkevich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chroma.2025.465983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is no unified equation that would correlate gas chromatographic retention indices of any organic compounds with their normal boiling points (at atmospheric pressure). Nevertheless, RI estimation with acceptable accuracy is possible using principal physicochemical properties, namely, boiling points, relative densities, and indices of refraction. The main feature of the algorithms proposed is the application of a logical criteria for comparing so-called indices of boiling points I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>), molecular weights I(<em>M</em>), and molar refractions I(MR<sub>D</sub>). If the comparison of these indices confirms the approximate equality of any two or all three of them (that is typical for nonpolar organic compounds), then as the best estimate of GC retention indices (RI<sub>calc</sub>) we can accept I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) values without any additional calculations. Such comparison is formally equivalent to the application of logical criteria for I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>), I(<em>M</em>), and I(MR<sub>D</sub>) values. For polar analytes, the relation I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) > <em>I</em>(MR<sub>D</sub>) > <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) is valid, and in these cases the inequality I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) > RI<sub>calc</sub> > <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) appeared to be correct. Instead of large intervals between <em>I</em>(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) and <em>I</em>(<em>M</em>) for estimating RI<sub>calc</sub>, the use of the relation RI<sub>calc</sub> ≈ (1 – <em>a</em>)I(<em>T</em><sub>b</sub>) + <em>a</em>I(MR<sub>D</sub>) + <em>b</em> is proposed. The indices of molecular weights are not used for the calculations directly, but they are needed just for application of the logical criteria.</div><div>The average accuracy of RI estimation by the method proposed is 9–16 index units for nonpolar compounds of any chemical nature and up to 27 for polar analytes. This high accuracy is comparable to that of the more sophisticated modern algorithms. The restriction of this approach is the impossibility of applying it to poly- and perfluoroorganic compounds.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"volume\":\"1754 \",\"pages\":\"Article 465983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325003310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967325003310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Logical criteria for estimating gas chromatographic retention indices of organic compounds using their physicochemical properties
There is no unified equation that would correlate gas chromatographic retention indices of any organic compounds with their normal boiling points (at atmospheric pressure). Nevertheless, RI estimation with acceptable accuracy is possible using principal physicochemical properties, namely, boiling points, relative densities, and indices of refraction. The main feature of the algorithms proposed is the application of a logical criteria for comparing so-called indices of boiling points I(Tb), molecular weights I(M), and molar refractions I(MRD). If the comparison of these indices confirms the approximate equality of any two or all three of them (that is typical for nonpolar organic compounds), then as the best estimate of GC retention indices (RIcalc) we can accept I(Tb) values without any additional calculations. Such comparison is formally equivalent to the application of logical criteria for I(Tb), I(M), and I(MRD) values. For polar analytes, the relation I(Tb) > I(MRD) > I(M) is valid, and in these cases the inequality I(Tb) > RIcalc > I(M) appeared to be correct. Instead of large intervals between I(Tb) and I(M) for estimating RIcalc, the use of the relation RIcalc ≈ (1 – a)I(Tb) + aI(MRD) + b is proposed. The indices of molecular weights are not used for the calculations directly, but they are needed just for application of the logical criteria.
The average accuracy of RI estimation by the method proposed is 9–16 index units for nonpolar compounds of any chemical nature and up to 27 for polar analytes. This high accuracy is comparable to that of the more sophisticated modern algorithms. The restriction of this approach is the impossibility of applying it to poly- and perfluoroorganic compounds.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chromatography A provides a forum for the publication of original research and critical reviews on all aspects of fundamental and applied separation science. The scope of the journal includes chromatography and related techniques, electromigration techniques (e.g. electrophoresis, electrochromatography), hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, sample preparation, and detection methods such as mass spectrometry. Contributions consist mainly of research papers dealing with the theory of separation methods, instrumental developments and analytical and preparative applications of general interest.