慢性心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺病远程医疗解决方案的成本效益、使用和实施:使用PRISMA方法的系统审查

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ofir Ben-Assuli
{"title":"慢性心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺病远程医疗解决方案的成本效益、使用和实施:使用PRISMA方法的系统审查","authors":"Ofir Ben-Assuli","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>According to leading health organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), telehealth applications have the potential to improve patients' health, particularly for the billions of patients suffering from chronic diseases such as Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). While telehealth solutions hold promise, there is currently inadequate clinical evidence supporting their use in public health surveillance and home-based care, making it difficult to draw decisive conclusions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, use, and implementation of telehealth solutions for patients with chronic diseases, specifically CHF and COPD, through a review of the current literature. This narrative review examined studies presenting cost-effectiveness analyses, use, and implementation of telehealth for these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This work implemented the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In order to receive recency and to examine recent and innovative telehealth solutions, articles published in English from 2010 to 2023 were included in the search. The inclusion criteria were papers on telehealth tools employed for CHF and COPD patients that assessed their cost-effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of the studies were conducted in Europe. Approximately half had an adequate sample size and tracked patients prospectively for a sufficient duration. The most frequently used telehealth method was distance monitoring, with only a few studies incorporating home visits or phone calls. The parameters monitored included blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and spirometry, among others. General statistical analyses and regression models were the most frequently used methods, although several studies incorporated Markov models and simulations.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The majority of the papers (20 out of 26) concluded that the tools implemented led to either cost-effectiveness, cost-savings or strongly dominance. This promising result shows that telehealth is an important topic that deserves further research on its effectiveness as well as cost-effectiveness for chronic disease management.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>One key limitation of this PRISMA review is that the literature search was restricted to two major diseases, and the language of the publications was exclusively English. Thus, the generalizability of the findings to other chronic diseases is subject to caution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"14 3","pages":"Article 101023"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness, use and implementation of telehealth solutions for CHF and COPD: A systematic review using the PRISMA method\",\"authors\":\"Ofir Ben-Assuli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>According to leading health organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), telehealth applications have the potential to improve patients' health, particularly for the billions of patients suffering from chronic diseases such as Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). While telehealth solutions hold promise, there is currently inadequate clinical evidence supporting their use in public health surveillance and home-based care, making it difficult to draw decisive conclusions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, use, and implementation of telehealth solutions for patients with chronic diseases, specifically CHF and COPD, through a review of the current literature. This narrative review examined studies presenting cost-effectiveness analyses, use, and implementation of telehealth for these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This work implemented the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In order to receive recency and to examine recent and innovative telehealth solutions, articles published in English from 2010 to 2023 were included in the search. The inclusion criteria were papers on telehealth tools employed for CHF and COPD patients that assessed their cost-effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of the studies were conducted in Europe. Approximately half had an adequate sample size and tracked patients prospectively for a sufficient duration. The most frequently used telehealth method was distance monitoring, with only a few studies incorporating home visits or phone calls. The parameters monitored included blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and spirometry, among others. General statistical analyses and regression models were the most frequently used methods, although several studies incorporated Markov models and simulations.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The majority of the papers (20 out of 26) concluded that the tools implemented led to either cost-effectiveness, cost-savings or strongly dominance. This promising result shows that telehealth is an important topic that deserves further research on its effectiveness as well as cost-effectiveness for chronic disease management.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>One key limitation of this PRISMA review is that the literature search was restricted to two major diseases, and the language of the publications was exclusively English. Thus, the generalizability of the findings to other chronic diseases is subject to caution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725000516\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725000516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生组织(世卫组织)和疾病控制和预防中心(疾控中心)等主要卫生组织认为,远程保健应用有可能改善患者的健康,特别是数十亿患有充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)等慢性病的患者。虽然远程保健解决方案大有希望,但目前支持其用于公共卫生监测和家庭护理的临床证据不足,因此难以得出决定性结论。本研究的目的是通过对现有文献的回顾,评估慢性病患者,特别是慢性心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺病患者远程医疗解决方案的成本效益、使用和实施情况。这篇叙述性综述审查了介绍这些患者远程医疗的成本效益分析、使用和实施的研究。方法本研究实施了系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。为了接收最新的和审查最新的和创新的远程保健解决方案,检索中包括了2010年至2023年以英文发表的文章。纳入标准是关于用于慢性心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺病患者的远程医疗工具的论文,评估其成本效益。结果大多数研究是在欧洲进行的。大约一半的研究有足够的样本量,并对患者进行了足够的随访。最常用的远程保健方法是远程监测,只有少数研究纳入了家访或电话。监测的参数包括血压、血氧饱和度、心率和肺活量测定等。一般统计分析和回归模型是最常用的方法,尽管一些研究结合了马尔可夫模型和模拟。大多数论文(26篇中的20篇)得出结论,实施的工具要么导致成本效益,要么导致成本节约,要么导致强大的主导地位。这一有希望的结果表明,远程保健是一个重要的主题,值得进一步研究其对慢性病管理的有效性和成本效益。局限性本次PRISMA综述的一个关键局限性是文献检索仅限于两种主要疾病,并且出版物的语言完全是英语。因此,将研究结果推广到其他慢性疾病需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness, use and implementation of telehealth solutions for CHF and COPD: A systematic review using the PRISMA method

Background

According to leading health organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), telehealth applications have the potential to improve patients' health, particularly for the billions of patients suffering from chronic diseases such as Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). While telehealth solutions hold promise, there is currently inadequate clinical evidence supporting their use in public health surveillance and home-based care, making it difficult to draw decisive conclusions.

Objective

The objective of this work was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, use, and implementation of telehealth solutions for patients with chronic diseases, specifically CHF and COPD, through a review of the current literature. This narrative review examined studies presenting cost-effectiveness analyses, use, and implementation of telehealth for these patients.

Methods

This work implemented the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In order to receive recency and to examine recent and innovative telehealth solutions, articles published in English from 2010 to 2023 were included in the search. The inclusion criteria were papers on telehealth tools employed for CHF and COPD patients that assessed their cost-effectiveness.

Results

The majority of the studies were conducted in Europe. Approximately half had an adequate sample size and tracked patients prospectively for a sufficient duration. The most frequently used telehealth method was distance monitoring, with only a few studies incorporating home visits or phone calls. The parameters monitored included blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and spirometry, among others. General statistical analyses and regression models were the most frequently used methods, although several studies incorporated Markov models and simulations.

Discussion

The majority of the papers (20 out of 26) concluded that the tools implemented led to either cost-effectiveness, cost-savings or strongly dominance. This promising result shows that telehealth is an important topic that deserves further research on its effectiveness as well as cost-effectiveness for chronic disease management.

Limitations

One key limitation of this PRISMA review is that the literature search was restricted to two major diseases, and the language of the publications was exclusively English. Thus, the generalizability of the findings to other chronic diseases is subject to caution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信