让我们聊天(GPT):实现由聊天GPT生成的健康活动的社会决定因素

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Karl R. Kodweis, Theodore J. Cory, Elizabeth A. Hall, Christa M. George, Katherine L. March
{"title":"让我们聊天(GPT):实现由聊天GPT生成的健康活动的社会决定因素","authors":"Karl R. Kodweis,&nbsp;Theodore J. Cory,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Hall,&nbsp;Christa M. George,&nbsp;Katherine L. March","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI)- powered chatbots have provided some notable benefits for learners. Educators are beginning to explore their possible utility and find ways to leverage AI in their classrooms.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of ChatGPT-generated social determinants of health (SDOH) activity in a team-based pharmacy education course.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Instructors asked the software to generate a set of learning objectives, an in-class activity, assessment strategies, and summative assessments for a student's conceptual understanding of SDOH. During a required first-year, team-based pharmacy course at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, participants (<em>n</em> = 95) completed a ChatGPT-generated, in-class activity on SDOH within groups. The students' views on the quality of the activity were evaluated using five Likert-scale questions. Four of the questions assessed the applicability and usefulness of the assignment, with rankings on a scale of 1–4 (1 = strongly disagree; 4 = strongly agree). The fifth question evaluated the quality of the activity compared to activities generated by the instructor, using a scale of 1–5 (1 = far worse; 5 = far better).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For applicability and usefulness,”94.7 % (<em>n</em> = 90) of students agreed that “This in-class exercise was valuable to my professional development as a pharmacist;” 96.8 % (<em>n</em> = 92) agreed with “It is necessary for pharmacists to understand SDOH;” 94.7 % (n = 90) agreement with the statement, “<em>The quality of this in-class activity was on-par with other in-class activities in the course</em>;” and 90.5 % (<em>n</em> = 86) agreed with “<em>This in-class exercise was just as impactful to my professional development as other in-class activities.</em>” The majority of students (63.2 %; <em>n</em> = 60) selected either “somewhat better” (40 %; <em>n</em> = 38) or far better (23.2 %; <em>n</em> = 22) for, “Regarding quality, I feel the in-class activity was ____ than other in-class activities.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most students reported that the ChatGPT-generated activity on social determinants of health was useful, applicable, and somewhat or far better than instructor activities. However, AI can generate incorrect information and potentially hinder student learning of conceptual frameworks; thus, instructors should review all output carefully.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100553"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's chat(GPT): Implementation of a ChatGPT-generated social determinants of health activity\",\"authors\":\"Karl R. Kodweis,&nbsp;Theodore J. Cory,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Hall,&nbsp;Christa M. George,&nbsp;Katherine L. March\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI)- powered chatbots have provided some notable benefits for learners. Educators are beginning to explore their possible utility and find ways to leverage AI in their classrooms.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of ChatGPT-generated social determinants of health (SDOH) activity in a team-based pharmacy education course.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Instructors asked the software to generate a set of learning objectives, an in-class activity, assessment strategies, and summative assessments for a student's conceptual understanding of SDOH. During a required first-year, team-based pharmacy course at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, participants (<em>n</em> = 95) completed a ChatGPT-generated, in-class activity on SDOH within groups. The students' views on the quality of the activity were evaluated using five Likert-scale questions. Four of the questions assessed the applicability and usefulness of the assignment, with rankings on a scale of 1–4 (1 = strongly disagree; 4 = strongly agree). The fifth question evaluated the quality of the activity compared to activities generated by the instructor, using a scale of 1–5 (1 = far worse; 5 = far better).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For applicability and usefulness,”94.7 % (<em>n</em> = 90) of students agreed that “This in-class exercise was valuable to my professional development as a pharmacist;” 96.8 % (<em>n</em> = 92) agreed with “It is necessary for pharmacists to understand SDOH;” 94.7 % (n = 90) agreement with the statement, “<em>The quality of this in-class activity was on-par with other in-class activities in the course</em>;” and 90.5 % (<em>n</em> = 86) agreed with “<em>This in-class exercise was just as impactful to my professional development as other in-class activities.</em>” The majority of students (63.2 %; <em>n</em> = 60) selected either “somewhat better” (40 %; <em>n</em> = 38) or far better (23.2 %; <em>n</em> = 22) for, “Regarding quality, I feel the in-class activity was ____ than other in-class activities.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most students reported that the ChatGPT-generated activity on social determinants of health was useful, applicable, and somewhat or far better than instructor activities. However, AI can generate incorrect information and potentially hinder student learning of conceptual frameworks; thus, instructors should review all output carefully.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)驱动的聊天机器人为学习者提供了一些显著的好处。教育工作者开始探索人工智能的可能用途,并找到在课堂上利用人工智能的方法。目的本研究旨在评估chatgpt生成的健康社会决定因素(SDOH)活动在团队药学教育课程中的实施情况。方法教师要求软件生成一套学习目标、课堂活动、评估策略和总结性评估,以帮助学生对SDOH的概念理解。在田纳西大学健康科学中心第一年的必修课中,以团队为基础的药学课程,参与者(n = 95)在小组中完成了chatgpt生成的关于SDOH的课堂活动。学生对活动质量的看法使用五个李克特量表问题进行评估。其中四个问题评估了作业的适用性和有用性,评分范围为1 - 4(1 =非常不同意;4 =强烈同意)。第五个问题用1 - 5分(1 =差得多;5 =好多了)。结果在适用性和有用性方面,94.7% (n = 90)的学生同意“该课堂练习对我作为药剂师的专业发展有价值”,96.8% (n = 92)的学生同意“药剂师有必要了解SDOH”,94.7% (n = 90)的学生同意“有必要了解SDOH”。90.5% (n = 86)的人同意“这个课堂练习和其他课堂活动一样,对我的专业发展有同样的影响。”大多数学生(63.2%;N = 60)选择“稍好一些”(40%;N = 38)或更好(23.2%;n = 22),“关于质量,我觉得课堂活动____比其他课堂活动。”大多数学生报告说,chatgpt生成的关于健康的社会决定因素的活动是有用的,适用的,并且在某种程度上或远远优于教师活动。然而,人工智能可能会产生不正确的信息,并可能阻碍学生对概念框架的学习;因此,教师应该仔细检查所有的输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let's chat(GPT): Implementation of a ChatGPT-generated social determinants of health activity

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI)- powered chatbots have provided some notable benefits for learners. Educators are beginning to explore their possible utility and find ways to leverage AI in their classrooms.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of ChatGPT-generated social determinants of health (SDOH) activity in a team-based pharmacy education course.

Methods

Instructors asked the software to generate a set of learning objectives, an in-class activity, assessment strategies, and summative assessments for a student's conceptual understanding of SDOH. During a required first-year, team-based pharmacy course at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, participants (n = 95) completed a ChatGPT-generated, in-class activity on SDOH within groups. The students' views on the quality of the activity were evaluated using five Likert-scale questions. Four of the questions assessed the applicability and usefulness of the assignment, with rankings on a scale of 1–4 (1 = strongly disagree; 4 = strongly agree). The fifth question evaluated the quality of the activity compared to activities generated by the instructor, using a scale of 1–5 (1 = far worse; 5 = far better).

Results

For applicability and usefulness,”94.7 % (n = 90) of students agreed that “This in-class exercise was valuable to my professional development as a pharmacist;” 96.8 % (n = 92) agreed with “It is necessary for pharmacists to understand SDOH;” 94.7 % (n = 90) agreement with the statement, “The quality of this in-class activity was on-par with other in-class activities in the course;” and 90.5 % (n = 86) agreed with “This in-class exercise was just as impactful to my professional development as other in-class activities.” The majority of students (63.2 %; n = 60) selected either “somewhat better” (40 %; n = 38) or far better (23.2 %; n = 22) for, “Regarding quality, I feel the in-class activity was ____ than other in-class activities.”

Conclusions

Most students reported that the ChatGPT-generated activity on social determinants of health was useful, applicable, and somewhat or far better than instructor activities. However, AI can generate incorrect information and potentially hinder student learning of conceptual frameworks; thus, instructors should review all output carefully.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信