神经介入手术中的上肢经静脉通路:来自最大单中心经验的见解

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mikaeel A. Habib , Luis O. Tierradentro-Garcia , Robert Romano , Suehyb G. Alkhatib , Jaeha Kim , Aarush Sahni , Aaron T. Zhao , Jason A. Brant , Douglas C. Bigelow , Tiffany Hwa , Michael J. Ruckenstein , Omar A. Choudhri
{"title":"神经介入手术中的上肢经静脉通路:来自最大单中心经验的见解","authors":"Mikaeel A. Habib ,&nbsp;Luis O. Tierradentro-Garcia ,&nbsp;Robert Romano ,&nbsp;Suehyb G. Alkhatib ,&nbsp;Jaeha Kim ,&nbsp;Aarush Sahni ,&nbsp;Aaron T. Zhao ,&nbsp;Jason A. Brant ,&nbsp;Douglas C. Bigelow ,&nbsp;Tiffany Hwa ,&nbsp;Michael J. Ruckenstein ,&nbsp;Omar A. Choudhri","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The transfemoral approach has traditionally been the primary access site for catheter-guided venography. Recently, upper extremity transvenous access (UETV) has emerged as a promising alternative for neurointerventional procedures, offering potential advantages such as reduced bleeding risk, improved ergonomics, faster recovery, shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times, and a lower likelihood of inadvertent arterial puncture. This study reports on a single-center experience of UETV for neurointerventional venous therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 158 diagnostic venograms and venous interventions were performed by a single operator between 2020 and 2024 at a single center, with primary intent to use the upper extremity veins for venous access. Data on patient demographics, procedural details, radiographic findings, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 158 procedures, successful upper extremity catheterization was achieved in 155 cases (98.1%), with 149 (94.3%) completed successfully. Conversion to a femoral approach was necessary in 3 cases (1.9%), all of which were completed successfully. Six interventions (3.8%) were aborted due to challenges in navigating the intracranial veins and venous sinuses that were unrelated to peripheral access. Minor complications occurred in 8 patients (5.1%); no major complications were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This single-center study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of upper extremity-only transvenous access for neurointerventional procedures in the management of complex cerebrovascular diseases. The cephalic and basilic veins of the antecubital fossa veins are recommended as primary access sites. These findings represent the largest case series to date using an upper extremity-first transvenous approach for neurointerventional therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 111325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper extremity transvenous access in neurointerventional procedures: Insights from the largest single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"Mikaeel A. Habib ,&nbsp;Luis O. Tierradentro-Garcia ,&nbsp;Robert Romano ,&nbsp;Suehyb G. Alkhatib ,&nbsp;Jaeha Kim ,&nbsp;Aarush Sahni ,&nbsp;Aaron T. Zhao ,&nbsp;Jason A. Brant ,&nbsp;Douglas C. Bigelow ,&nbsp;Tiffany Hwa ,&nbsp;Michael J. Ruckenstein ,&nbsp;Omar A. Choudhri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The transfemoral approach has traditionally been the primary access site for catheter-guided venography. Recently, upper extremity transvenous access (UETV) has emerged as a promising alternative for neurointerventional procedures, offering potential advantages such as reduced bleeding risk, improved ergonomics, faster recovery, shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times, and a lower likelihood of inadvertent arterial puncture. This study reports on a single-center experience of UETV for neurointerventional venous therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 158 diagnostic venograms and venous interventions were performed by a single operator between 2020 and 2024 at a single center, with primary intent to use the upper extremity veins for venous access. Data on patient demographics, procedural details, radiographic findings, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 158 procedures, successful upper extremity catheterization was achieved in 155 cases (98.1%), with 149 (94.3%) completed successfully. Conversion to a femoral approach was necessary in 3 cases (1.9%), all of which were completed successfully. Six interventions (3.8%) were aborted due to challenges in navigating the intracranial veins and venous sinuses that were unrelated to peripheral access. Minor complications occurred in 8 patients (5.1%); no major complications were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This single-center study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of upper extremity-only transvenous access for neurointerventional procedures in the management of complex cerebrovascular diseases. The cephalic and basilic veins of the antecubital fossa veins are recommended as primary access sites. These findings represent the largest case series to date using an upper extremity-first transvenous approach for neurointerventional therapy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825002978\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825002978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,经股入路是导管引导静脉造影的主要入路。最近,上肢经静脉通路(UETV)已成为神经介入手术的一种有希望的替代方法,具有降低出血风险、改善人体工程学、更快恢复、更短的手术和透视时间以及更低的意外动脉穿刺可能性等潜在优势。本研究报告了UETV用于神经介入静脉治疗的单中心经验。方法在2020年至2024年期间,由一名操作员在一个中心进行了158例诊断静脉造影和静脉干预,主要目的是利用上肢静脉进行静脉通路。收集和分析了患者人口统计学、手术细节、放射学表现和结果的数据。结果158例手术中,上肢置管成功155例(98.1%),成功149例(94.3%)。3例(1.9%)需要转股入路,均成功完成。6例(3.8%)由于颅内静脉和静脉窦导航困难而流产,这些静脉和静脉窦与外周通路无关。发生轻微并发症8例(5.1%);无重大并发症。结论本单中心研究证明了仅上肢经静脉进入神经介入治疗复杂脑血管疾病的可行性和安全性。枕前窝静脉的头静脉和基底静脉被推荐为主要的入路。这些发现代表了迄今为止使用上肢优先经静脉入路进行神经介入治疗的最大病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Upper extremity transvenous access in neurointerventional procedures: Insights from the largest single-center experience

Background

The transfemoral approach has traditionally been the primary access site for catheter-guided venography. Recently, upper extremity transvenous access (UETV) has emerged as a promising alternative for neurointerventional procedures, offering potential advantages such as reduced bleeding risk, improved ergonomics, faster recovery, shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times, and a lower likelihood of inadvertent arterial puncture. This study reports on a single-center experience of UETV for neurointerventional venous therapy.

Methods

A total of 158 diagnostic venograms and venous interventions were performed by a single operator between 2020 and 2024 at a single center, with primary intent to use the upper extremity veins for venous access. Data on patient demographics, procedural details, radiographic findings, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results

Out of 158 procedures, successful upper extremity catheterization was achieved in 155 cases (98.1%), with 149 (94.3%) completed successfully. Conversion to a femoral approach was necessary in 3 cases (1.9%), all of which were completed successfully. Six interventions (3.8%) were aborted due to challenges in navigating the intracranial veins and venous sinuses that were unrelated to peripheral access. Minor complications occurred in 8 patients (5.1%); no major complications were observed.

Conclusions

This single-center study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of upper extremity-only transvenous access for neurointerventional procedures in the management of complex cerebrovascular diseases. The cephalic and basilic veins of the antecubital fossa veins are recommended as primary access sites. These findings represent the largest case series to date using an upper extremity-first transvenous approach for neurointerventional therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信